---
schema_version: 1
rubric_version: "1.1"
kind: pair
canonical_url: "https://onaihq.com/compare/agents/onai-vs-unique-ai/"
data_url: "https://onaihq.com/compare/agents/onai-vs-unique-ai/data.json"
generated_at: 2026-10-27
last_checked_at: 2026-10-26
last_cross_checked_at: 2026-10-26
next_check_at: 2026-12-20
publisher: "onAI"
---

# onAI vs Unique AI

> Published by onAI. onAI also sells one of the products compared here. Findings about other products link to public sources so you can check them; statements about onAI are marked as stated by onAI.

This comparison has 16 criteria with sourced findings for both products, including 13 that a second agent cross-checked for both. 50 criteria have a sourced finding for at least one product, and 44 carry a statement by onAI. "Sourced" findings passed publication validation: they are scoped, fresh and cite public resolved sources. "Agent cross-checked" findings also received a separate agent source pass, not necessarily a hands-on test. "Stated by onAI" marks the publisher's own statements about its product (evidence type vendor-statement), which cite no third-party source. Humans approve the rubric, templates and generator; they do not review every finding. It does not declare a winner. A missing sourced finding is not evidence that a capability is absent.

- onAI source checks: 2026-10-21 to 2026-10-26.
- Unique AI source checks: 2026-10-21 to 2026-10-26.

- Canonical HTML: https://onaihq.com/compare/agents/onai-vs-unique-ai/
- Machine-readable JSON: https://onaihq.com/compare/agents/onai-vs-unique-ai/data.json
- Methodology: https://onaihq.com/compare/agents/methodology/

## Models

### MOD-01: Model catalogue and providers

Judgment rule: List each available model by provider and plan, including reasoning, fast and multimodal variants. Record whether the user picks the model, the product routes automatically, or both. A provider counts only if at least one of its current models is selectable on the scoped plan.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The public page offers user-selectable Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok and Mistral families. Exact chat model versions, automatic routing and per-model input capabilities are not established.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat and Flat price public offers; exact model entitlements unspecified; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Unspecified by source; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Model-family marketing is not a tested model inventory or a release-lag measurement.

- providers — Which model providers are available? [supported]: The vendor names Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI and Mistral AI model families; current selectable provider inventory was not observed. Sources: onai:public-models-display-20261026.
- current_models — Which current models are selectable on this plan? [partial]: The page names Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok and Mistral families, but supplies no complete versioned chat-model list per plan. Sources: onai:public-models-display-20261026.
- user_choice — Can users pick the model per chat? [supported]: Employees choose a model for a task within the administrator-approved set. Sources: onai:public-models-display-20261026.
- auto_routing — Does the product route between models automatically, and is the chosen model shown? [unknown]: The public model section does not establish automatic routing or disclosure of its selected model; no app fixture was run.
- multimodal_input — Which models accept images, audio or files? [unknown]: Public chat-model copy does not map image, audio or file input to named model versions. Image Studio is a separate capability.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-models-display-20261026

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The platform catalogue supports several providers, subject to tenant credentials, contracts and validation status.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Exact contracted/activated models, automatic cross-model routing and a complete image/audio/file matrix were not established. Catalogue dates include future release identifiers; dated additions and tenant eligibility take precedence over a release number.

- providers — Which model providers are available? [partial]: Catalogue includes Azure OpenAI/OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini/Vertex, Together AI and xAI. Provider use must be agreed with each client; a catalogue row is not proof every tenant has it. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:models.
- current_models — Which current models are selectable on this plan? [partial]: Release 2026.42, hosted 14 October, explicitly adds Azure GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Opus/Sonnet 5.5 through Anthropic/Vertex. Availability overview also lists Gemini3.8 Flash; provider/tenant credentials and validation differ. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:release42, unique-ai:unique-ai:models.
- user_choice — Can users pick the model per chat? [partial]: Space admins set enabled models; release notes describe chat model switching and API per-message model selection under the same rules. Conduct choices depend on administrator configuration. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:release42, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct.
- auto_routing — Does the product route between models automatically, and is the chosen model shown? [unknown]: Does the product route between models automatically, and is the chosen model shown? Unknown. Exact contracted/activated models, automatic cross-model routing and a complete image/audio/file matrix were not established. Catalogue dates include future release identifiers; dated additions and tenant eligibility take precedence over a release number.
- multimodal_input — Which models accept images, audio or files? [unknown]: Which models accept images, audio or files? Unknown. Exact contracted/activated models, automatic cross-model routing and a complete image/audio/file matrix were not established. Catalogue dates include future release identifiers; dated additions and tenant eligibility take precedence over a release number.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:models, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct, unique-ai:unique-ai:release42

### MOD-02: Model freshness

Judgment rule: Measure the days from a provider's general release to availability in the product for the last three major releases from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google (and Mistral where offered). Use dated changelogs or observation. Record deprecation notice for retired models.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

We enable new models shortly after their release.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Unique publishes dated model additions and retirement/migration notes; a complete provider-release lag series remains unknown.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- A provider-verified last-three-major-release lag series for OpenAI, Anthropic and Google was not assembled; availability can depend on each contract. Admin version-pinning guarantees are not documented.

- release_lag_days — What was the lag for each of the last three major releases, per provider? [unknown]: What was the lag for each of the last three major releases, per provider? Unknown. A provider-verified last-three-major-release lag series for OpenAI, Anthropic and Google was not assembled; availability can depend on each contract. Admin version-pinning guarantees are not documented.
- changelog — Is there a dated public model changelog? [supported]: Availability overview has a dated Recent changes table through 13 October 2026, with provider retirement sources. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:models.
- deprecation_notice — How much notice is given before a model is removed? [partial]: Dated 14 October release announces migrations ahead of o-series provider retirement on 19 November 2026. No guaranteed Unique contractual notice period is established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:release42.
- version_pinning — Can an admin keep an older model version? [unknown]: Can an admin keep an older model version? Unknown. A provider-verified last-three-major-release lag series for OpenAI, Anthropic and Google was not assembled; availability can depend on each contract. Admin version-pinning guarantees are not documented.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:models, unique-ai:unique-ai:release42

### MOD-03: Bring-your-own keys and provider contracts

Judgment rule: Record customer-held API keys, customer cloud accounts (Azure OpenAI, Bedrock, Vertex), and aggregator routes (OpenRouter, LiteLLM) as separate routes. Record what still works without a vendor-provided model, whether prices change with BYO, and documented restrictions. API-key support does not imply support for the customer's own Azure contract.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Your own provider contracts and API keys (for example Azure, OpenRouter) are possible on request.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Operators can configure customer model endpoints and credentials through GraphQL.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- BYO licence discounts, provider-by-provider contract onboarding and a full tool/RAG/embedding parity matrix are not public.

- own_api_keys — Can the customer use its own provider API keys? [supported]: ExternalLanguageModel accepts provider API credentials stored encrypted as immutable write-only values; OAuth2 is also documented. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:customllm.
- own_cloud_contract — Can it use its own Azure OpenAI, Bedrock or Vertex deployment? [partial]: Custom Azure OpenAI deployment examples specify customer endpoint, deployment, API version and token. Compliance docs mention Bedrock; exact supported Bedrock/Vertex contract routes need deployment scoping. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:customllm, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance.
- custom_endpoint — Can an admin add any OpenAI-compatible endpoint? [partial]: Documents self/cloud-hosted LXM endpoints and an Azure-compatible connection object. Universal support for any OpenAI-compatible endpoint is not guaranteed. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:customllm.
- byo_pricing — Does BYO change the licence price? [unknown]: Does BYO change the licence price? Unknown. BYO licence discounts, provider-by-provider contract onboarding and a full tool/RAG/embedding parity matrix are not public.
- byo_restrictions — Which features stop working with BYO? [partial]: Azure Chat Code Execution requires compatible Azure Responses models; switching a custom model group name/deleting an in-use group can break configured assistants. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:customllm, unique-ai:unique-ai:code.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:customllm, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance, unique-ai:unique-ai:code

### MOD-04: Local and self-hosted models

Judgment rule: Record support for models running in the customer's environment (vLLM, Ollama, TGI or similar) and which features work with them: chat, RAG, tools, embeddings. Distinguish a documented, supported route from a generic endpoint that happens to work.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

With on-premises, local models can be connected (for example via Ollama).

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The platform documents custom model and embedding connections. Tool parity depends on the selected route: Code Execution lists Azure and LiteLLM OpenAI compatibility, while arbitrary self-hosted model parity is unverified.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; custom-model/embedding connectors and optional Code Execution availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Code Execution has a listed Responses-capability/model matrix, not universal support for every custom-hosted model. Azure sandbox controls are not extended to every LiteLLM route.
- No customer runtime or feature-parity fixture was used; QA-only Phoeniqs is not presented as GA.

- self_hosted_chat — Can chat use a customer-hosted model? [supported]: Custom LXM and on-premises architecture allow customer-hosted model connections. Models, endpoint compatibility and enabled modules are selected for the contracted deployment. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:customllm, unique-ai:unique-ai:onpremsecurity.
- self_hosted_embeddings — Can retrieval use customer-hosted embeddings? [partial]: An instance maintainer can configure embedding endpoint, key and deployment; the operator overview allows self-hosted embeddings. Supported non-Azure runtimes and a particular customer configuration were not verified. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:embeddings, unique-ai:unique-ai:operators.
- feature_parity — Which features fail with self-hosted models? [partial]: Changing embeddings requires re-embedding existing files. The Code Execution compatibility section explicitly lists Azure Responses-capable IDs and LiteLLM OpenAI IDs, so no blanket Azure-only restriction is asserted. Its introduction/security section describes an Azure sandbox; the actual LiteLLM execution route and parity for arbitrary self-hosted models remain unverified. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:embeddings, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-code.
- vendor_hosted_open_models — Does the vendor host open-weight models in EU/CH? [partial]: The model catalogue describes Swiss Phoeniqs open models in QA only, not the UAT01/Prod offer. Production entitlement to a vendor-hosted Swiss open model was not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-models.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:customllm, unique-ai:unique-ai:onpremsecurity, unique-ai:unique-ai:embeddings, unique-ai:unique-ai:operators, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-code, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-models

### MOD-05: Model control and usage limits

Judgment rule: Record admin allow-lists per group, default models, restrictions on which models may see which data, and per-user rate or fair-use limits. Test one restriction with two users in different groups. Record limits as enforced stops, warnings or undocumented fair use.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source.

Admins decide per group which models are allowed.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Models and knowledge/tools are configured per access-controlled Space; optional beta daily spending caps block calls.

Availability: beta
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No two-group restriction fixture was run. Exact contract token/message limits, platform-wide model allow-lists and provider data-routing policy remain unverified.

- model_allowlist_by_group — Can admins limit models per group? [partial]: Admins bind deployed/approved models to Spaces and grant people/groups space access. Direct per-group model lists across all chats are not documented. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- data_bound_models — Can admins restrict which models receive connector or knowledge content? [partial]: A Space binds one model, selected KB sources and tools, and people/group access. A global connector-content model policy is not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- default_model — Can admins set the default model? [supported]: Administrators select the model for each Space. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- user_limits — What per-user message or token limits apply, and are they published? [partial]: Off-by-default beta cost management supports daily USD limits at company/group/user levels, reset at user-local midnight. Public fixed token/message quotas are not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:cost.
- limit_behaviour — What happens when a limit is reached? [supported]: With limits enabled, the next model call is blocked when daily spend reaches the cap. Most permissive group limit wins unless a user override exists. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:cost.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:cost

## Company knowledge

### KNOW-01: Files in chat

Judgment rule: Record supported formats, size and count limits, scanned-PDF OCR, tables and spreadsheets, images inside documents, and whether a file is read in full or retrieved in chunks. Upload the shared fixture set (long German PDF, scanned contract, Excel with formulas, PowerPoint) and record failures.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Upload PDF, Word, Excel and other files directly in the chat and ask about them.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Chat upload defaults are 512 MB/file and 30 files/batch, with source retrieval for large documents.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Configured scanned-PDF OCR is documented: MDI supports image-based PDFs, Docling has partial support, and Base Unique Ingestion does not support them. MDI must be provisioned and enabled for the folder or chat Space.
- Scanned-PDF accuracy, formula preservation, embedded-figure extraction and shared fixture outcomes were not measured. Older general ingestion limits differ from current production chat defaults.

- formats — Which formats are accepted? [supported]: Chat supports PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, CSV, HTML, MD and TXT; PNG/JPEG when enabled per Space. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:files.
- limits — What size and count limits apply per file and chat? [partial]: Production Chat defaults 512 MB/file, 30 files/upload. Code Execution has separate 100 MB and 10-file limits. Environment overrides and aggregate chat caps need tenant confirmation. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:files, unique-ai:unique-ai:code.
- ocr — Are scanned PDFs read? [partial]: The file-ingestion guide explicitly distinguishes methods: Base Unique Ingestion does not support image-based scanned PDFs, MDI supports them, and Docling has partial support. MDI must be provisioned and enabled for the folder or in the chat Space ingestion settings. Experimental image-content extraction and deprecated agentic ingestion are separate. No scanned-document fixture or accuracy measurement was run. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:file-ingestion-20261026.
- spreadsheets — Are Excel tables read with structure intact? [partial]: Chat guide says default extraction can fail beyond 5,000 rows x 100 columns. General format guide lists 1,000 x 40; formulas and structure retention were not tested. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:files, unique-ai:unique-ai:filetypes.
- full_vs_chunked — Is the whole file used or only retrieved parts, and does the user see which? [supported]: Checked uploads force retrieval each turn. Large files contribute selected chunks, not necessarily the full file, and users do not see full coverage. Experimental full-PDF mode is separate. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:files.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-25.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:files, unique-ai:unique-ai:code, unique-ai:unique-ai:filetypes, unique-ai:unique-ai:file-ingestion-20261026

### KNOW-02: Knowledge bases and shared collections

Judgment rule: Record curated document collections that persist across chats, who can create and share them, size limits, and how they attach to assistants. Distinguish personal, group and organisation-wide scope.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Shared knowledge collections with access rights per group.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Knowledge folders persist and can be scoped to users/groups and bound to Spaces.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Public total collection/document/token caps and organisation-wide sharing defaults are not specified; chat-only uploads are separately private and expiring.

- persistent_collections — Can users keep document collections across chats? [supported]: Ingested content lives in knowledge-base folders/scopes beyond a chat. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:kbpermissions.
- sharing_scope — Can collections be shared with users, groups or the whole organisation? [supported]: ScopeAccess grants users or groups read/write access. A flat folder permission does not automatically grant subfolder access. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:kbpermissions.
- size_limits — What are the collection limits? [unknown]: What are the collection limits? Unknown. Public total collection/document/token caps and organisation-wide sharing defaults are not specified; chat-only uploads are separately private and expiring.
- assistant_binding — Can collections be bound to an assistant? [supported]: Space Internal Search binds selected folders/files and further narrows user permissions. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:kbpermissions, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent

### KNOW-03: Enterprise connectors

Judgment rule: List each connector separately with plan, availability and setup owner: SharePoint, OneDrive, Outlook, Teams, Google Drive, Gmail, Confluence, Jira, Notion, Box, Salesforce, ServiceNow, file shares. Record whether the vendor or a third party (or the customer via MCP) provides it, and whether it needs admin consent. A connector listed on a roadmap or partner page is `announced`. An on-prem connector or gateway proves access to local data, not a self-hosted platform (DATA-02).

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The vendor describes live Microsoft 365 access with specific delegated permissions. Other connector names are marketing leads with incomplete source and plan scope.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Microsoft 365 listed in Per seat and Flat price; optional Microsoft licences/permissions apply; add_ons=Optional existing Microsoft 365 Copilot licence for semantic search and meeting notes; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Source tenant region and model processing region depend on customer configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Microsoft 365 claims are vendor statements, not an observed tenant connection. Generic connector examples are not individually verified integrations.

- microsoft_365 — Which M365 sources (SharePoint, OneDrive, Outlook, Teams) are connected? [supported]: The page lists SharePoint/OneDrive files, SharePoint pages/lists, Outlook mail/attachments, calendar, Teams chats, OneNote, To Do/Planner and directory. Channels and meeting transcripts require additional admin approval; semantic Copilot search/meeting notes require eligible Microsoft 365 Copilot licences. Sources: onai:public-m365-display-20261026, onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026.
- google_workspace — Which Google sources are connected? [unknown]: The page’s Google sign-in is not a Google Drive/Gmail connector specification. No scoped Google Workspace data connector or trial was verified.
- atlassian — Confluence and Jira? [partial]: The FAQ names Confluence as a standard-connector example without setup, plan or permission details. Jira availability is not established. Sources: onai:public-other-connectors-display-20261026.
- other_systems — Which other business systems? [partial]: The FAQ names S3 and proprietary data sources through connectors or an API. No source-by-source catalogue for Notion, Box, Salesforce or ServiceNow was obtained. Sources: onai:public-other-connectors-display-20261026.
- on_prem_sources — Can on-prem file shares or databases be connected? [unknown]: Custom database and on-premises hosting copy does not establish an operational file-share/database connector, network gateway or associated plan requirements.
- connector_provider — Who builds and maintains each connector? [partial]: onAI says its Microsoft app supplies the Microsoft 365 connection and IT approves delegated permissions; no provider/maintenance contract is specified for the other example connectors. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-m365-display-20261026, onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:public-other-connectors-display-20261026

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Indexed SharePoint and Confluence are documented. Current architecture also names Google Drive/Salesforce, and release notes describe Salesforce/Yahoo Finance MCP connector dashboards; detailed entitlements and source permissions remain connector-specific.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique MCP Hub and Knowledge Base MCP; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Architecture labels and release examples do not prove that every source is enabled or included in every contract.
- Future items on the roadmap are not promoted to current connector support.
- No source-connection or two-user permission fixture was run.

- microsoft_365 — Which M365 sources (SharePoint, OneDrive, Outlook, Teams) are connected? [partial]: SharePoint Online connector copies selected content with application consent and optional permission sync. Platform documentation also exposes Teams and Outlook MCP operator guides, but their exact contracted scope and OneDrive coverage were not verified. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint.
- google_workspace — Which Google sources are connected? [partial]: The current Platform Overview names Google Drive as a Knowledge Source feeding the Knowledge Base. It does not establish Gmail/Calendar coverage, a deployment guide, source consent scopes or inclusion in a particular customer contract. This is a documented architecture listing, not an observed enabled connector. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:platform-overview-20261026.
- atlassian — Confluence and Jira? [partial]: Official Confluence connector supports Cloud and Data Center; Jira connector coverage was not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence.
- other_systems — Which other business systems? [partial]: Release 2026.40 names Salesforce and Yahoo Finance as examples in GA MCP connector dashboards that admins can list, enable and sign in to. Platform Overview also names Salesforce as a Knowledge Source. Exact origin implementation, connector rights, credentials and commercial inclusion vary by configured connector and contract. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:release40-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:platform-overview-20261026.
- on_prem_sources — Can on-prem file shares or databases be connected? [partial]: Confluence Data Center sources are supported via REST. Generic file-share/database connector scope was not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence.
- connector_provider — Who builds and maintains each connector? [supported]: Unique publishes Kubernetes operator guides for SharePoint and Confluence; client IT supplies source credentials, consent, scope and deployment configuration. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint, unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-25.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint, unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence, unique-ai:unique-ai:platform-overview-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:release40-20261026

### KNOW-04: Permission-aware retrieval

Judgment rule: Using two test users, verify that a restricted document in the fixture tenant is never cited or summarised for the user without access, including after a permission change. Record whether permissions are enforced at query time by the source system, mirrored into an index, or not enforced. Record the propagation delay of a revocation.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

For Microsoft 365 the vendor claims per-user source permission checks at query time. Revocation delay, site exclusions and sensitivity-label behavior have not been tested.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat; Flat price includes everything in Per seat. Microsoft 365 connector consent and source-account access required.; add_ons=Customer Microsoft account and required delegated consent; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Customer Microsoft tenant; receiving model region configured separately; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Scope is the live Microsoft 365 connector. Native knowledge collection ACLs and copied/shared answers require separate checks.
- Public pricing explicitly includes Microsoft 365 in Per seat and inherits it in Flat price. This establishes advertised plan scope, not a completed permission or deletion-propagation fixture.

- source_permissions_respected — Are source permissions enforced per user? [supported]: The vendor says onAI makes delegated read-only requests as the signed-in user and Microsoft checks that person’s source access. No two-user restricted-folder fixture was run. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026.
- enforcement_point — Does the source system, a mirrored index or nothing enforce them? [supported]: Microsoft is the stated enforcement point for live requests; the page says no mirrored Microsoft 365 library index is created. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026.
- revocation_delay — How quickly does a removed permission take effect? [unknown]: No measured permission-revocation propagation interval is published and no revoke/grant fixture was run.
- admin_scope_controls — Can admins exclude sites, folders or labels? [unknown]: The page lists optional source permissions and model restrictions but does not establish site/folder/label exclusion controls.
- sensitivity_labels — Are Microsoft Purview or similar labels respected? [unknown]: No Microsoft Purview sensitivity-label handling specification or label fixture was obtained.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026, onai:review-plan-m365-display-20261026

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

SharePoint permission mirroring is optional; Confluence does not synchronise source permissions.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No two-user restricted-document/revocation fixture was run. End-to-end revocation SLA and label enforcement are not established. Older folder-permissions documentation says SharePoint never mirrors permissions, conflicting with the newer optional-sync guide.

- source_permissions_respected — Are source permissions enforced per user? [partial]: SharePoint content_and_permissions mirrors source rights, while content_only uses Unique scope rules. Confluence explicitly has no source-permission sync, so Unique folder access needs configuration. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint, unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence.
- enforcement_point — Does the source system, a mirrored index or nothing enforce them? [supported]: Indexed content is filtered through Unique user/group ScopeAccess. This is not source-system live query-time enforcement. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:kbpermissions, unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint.
- revocation_delay — How quickly does a removed permission take effect? [partial]: SharePoint source rights refresh periodically, default scans 15 minutes. Internal gatekeeper changes usually propagate under one second but have no hard upper bound; degraded/missed broadcasts can leave old rules active. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint, unique-ai:unique-ai:permissioncache.
- admin_scope_controls — Can admins exclude sites, folders or labels? [supported]: Admins allow SharePoint sites/libraries and require a sync flag, Confluence labels, and Space KB restrictions. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint, unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- sensitivity_labels — Are Microsoft Purview or similar labels respected? [partial]: July SharePoint connector explicitly excludes sensitivity/classification-level detection. Separately, release2026.42 documents experimental Purview-protected-file decryption using uploader rights, gated by MIP_DECRYPTION_ENABLED and Entra/operator changes. This is not proof of general label-policy enforcement. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:release42, unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint, unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence, unique-ai:unique-ai:kbpermissions, unique-ai:unique-ai:permissioncache, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:release42

### KNOW-05: Freshness and sync model

Judgment rule: Record live (federated) search versus a copied index, sync interval, deletion propagation, and where the index is stored. Edit and delete one fixture document and record when answers change. A copied index adds storage location to DATA-01.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Microsoft 365 is described as live retrieval without a second library index. Content read into a chat remains in that conversation, and no edit/delete timing was measured.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat; Flat price includes everything in Per seat. Microsoft 365 connector consent and source-account access required.; add_ons=Microsoft delegated connector consent; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Source data in customer Microsoft tenant; chat storage per deployment; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- This is the Microsoft 365 sync model only. Uploaded knowledge collections use a separate storage/retrieval mechanism.
- Public pricing explicitly includes Microsoft 365 in Per seat and inherits it in Flat price. This establishes advertised plan scope, not a completed permission or deletion-propagation fixture.

- live_or_indexed — Is content searched live or copied into an index? [supported]: The vendor describes live Microsoft 365 reads, no copied library and no background synchronisation. This statement does not cover uploaded knowledge-base documents. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026.
- sync_interval — How often does an index refresh? [supported]: The described Microsoft 365 route has no library-index sync job; source service search freshness still depends on Microsoft. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026.
- deletion_propagation — How quickly does a deleted document disappear? [unknown]: No edit/delete fixture was run. The page says material already read stays in the user’s chat, so source deletion cannot be treated as retroactive chat erasure. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026.
- index_location — Where is indexed content stored? [supported]: No separate onAI Microsoft 365 library index is claimed. Retrieved content is retained in the asking user’s chat; the precise chat-storage country is separately unverified. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026, onai:review-plan-m365-display-20261026

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

SharePoint and Confluence copy content to Unique indexes on configurable scans, default every 15 minutes.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No source-edit/delete fixture was run. Actual sync duration, strict deletion SLA and index/backup region per contract remain unverified.

- live_or_indexed — Is content searched live or copied into an index? [supported]: Connectors ingest documents/page attachments into the Unique knowledge base for RAG. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint, unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence.
- sync_interval — How often does an index refresh? [supported]: Default 15-minute scan for both connectors; schedules are configurable. Real-time sync is explicitly not supported. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint, unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence.
- deletion_propagation — How quickly does a deleted document disappear? [partial]: Diff processing detects deleted source files/pages and removes them on a sync run. A strict completion bound is not provided. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint, unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence.
- index_location — Where is indexed content stored? [partial]: Hosted documents use Azure storage; embeddings Qdrant and search vectors on managed disks in the selected deployment. Exact per-client index region needs the MSA/architecture. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:retention, unique-ai:unique-ai:keys.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint, unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence, unique-ai:unique-ai:retention, unique-ai:unique-ai:keys

### KNOW-06: Grounding and retrieval quality

Judgment rule: Run the shared question set over the fixture corpus: factual lookups, cross-document questions, German document with an English question, a question with no answer in the corpus. Record citation presence, link accuracy, correct answers and refusals to invent. Disclose model, settings, attempt count and failures. Single runs support a case study, not a ranking.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

For Per seat and Flat price Microsoft 365 answers, the vendor describes numbered source citations. Grounding accuracy, abstention and cross-language retrieval remain unknown without the shared fixture.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat; Flat price includes everything in Per seat. Microsoft 365 connector consent and source-account access required.; add_ons=Required Microsoft delegated consent and customer source-account access; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Customer Microsoft tenant; receiving model region depends on configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- This record covers Microsoft 365 source citations on the two named public offers. No observed accuracy, link verification, abstention or cross-language retrieval result is claimed.

- citations — Are answers linked to specific sources? [supported]: For Microsoft 365 answers included in Per seat and inherited by Flat price, the vendor describes numbered links to the original email, file or chat. The illustrated conversations are examples; citation accuracy was not observed. Sources: onai:review-plan-m365-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026.
- citation_accuracy — Do the cited passages support the answer? [unknown]: No fixture or real source-linked answer was checked for passage support or link accuracy.
- cross_language — Does a question in one language find documents in another? [unknown]: The DE/FR/EN question set was not run against a connected corpus; interface translation does not establish cross-language retrieval quality.
- no_answer_behaviour — Does it say when the corpus has no answer? [unknown]: No no-answer corpus fixture was run; the public example does not establish reliable abstention.
- observed_accuracy — How many of the question set were answered correctly? [unknown]: No observed question-set numerator, denominator, model/settings or repeat count is available. No accuracy percentage is invented.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026, onai:review-plan-m365-display-20261026

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Unique documents source-linked answers and reference limits, without a shared-corpus accuracy result.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No shared question set was run. Citation correctness, cross-language recall, no-answer behaviour and observed accuracy remain unmeasured. Vendor evaluation tools are not our benchmark results.

- citations — Are answers linked to specific sources? [supported]: Chat retrieval cites sources; Conduct links source facts, with PDF/Word page-level references and other formats at document level. Generated files are not citation-linked or hallucination-checked. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:files, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct.
- citation_accuracy — Do the cited passages support the answer? [unknown]: Do the cited passages support the answer? Unknown. No shared question set was run. Citation correctness, cross-language recall, no-answer behaviour and observed accuracy remain unmeasured. Vendor evaluation tools are not our benchmark results.
- cross_language — Does a question in one language find documents in another? [unknown]: Does a question in one language find documents in another? Unknown. No shared question set was run. Citation correctness, cross-language recall, no-answer behaviour and observed accuracy remain unmeasured. Vendor evaluation tools are not our benchmark results.
- no_answer_behaviour — Does it say when the corpus has no answer? [unknown]: Does it say when the corpus has no answer? Unknown. No shared question set was run. Citation correctness, cross-language recall, no-answer behaviour and observed accuracy remain unmeasured. Vendor evaluation tools are not our benchmark results.
- observed_accuracy — How many of the question set were answered correctly? [unknown]: How many of the question set were answered correctly? Unknown. No shared question set was run. Citation correctness, cross-language recall, no-answer behaviour and observed accuracy remain unmeasured. Vendor evaluation tools are not our benchmark results.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:files, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct

### KNOW-07: Memory and personal context

Judgment rule: Record personal custom instructions, cross-chat memory, project or workspace context, and user controls to view, edit, delete or disable memory. Record whether admins can disable memory organisation-wide.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Personal instructions that apply across all chats.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Context Memory provides a private cross-chat user profile with edit and opt-out controls.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No authenticated memory fixture or permanent deletion test was run. The guide explicitly contradicts the settings deletion promise.

- custom_instructions — Can users set persistent instructions? [partial]: Admins configure Space instructions; memory learns preferences. A separate persistent user-authored global instruction field was not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:memory.
- cross_chat_memory — Does the product remember facts across chats? [supported]: One per-user profile is loaded across enabled spaces/chats and updated after answers; stored in a private unindexed KB folder. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:memory.
- user_memory_controls — Can users view, edit and delete memories? [partial]: Users view/edit the profile and disable updates/loading. Docs explicitly say disabling does not delete the profile despite contrary settings text; a delete control is not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:memory.
- admin_memory_controls — Can admins turn memory off? [supported]: Release2026.42 makes Context Memory GA, with per-company enable/disable feature flag and per-Space activation. Users can opt out; Web Search combinations remain restricted by default. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:release42, unique-ai:unique-ai:memory.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:memory, unique-ai:unique-ai:release42

## Assistants and agents

### AGT-01: Custom assistants

Judgment rule: Record creation of assistants with instructions, model, knowledge and tools; who can create; sharing scope; versioning; and an internal catalogue or directory. Build one HR policy assistant on the fixture and share it with one group. Prompt templates and a prompt library are recorded here.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Create your own assistants with instructions and knowledge and share them with your team.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Admins configure Spaces with instructions, models, knowledge, tools, prompts and group access.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Assistant versioning, organisation-wide directory discovery and unrestricted end-user creation were not established.

- create_assistants — Can users create assistants with instructions, knowledge and tools? [supported]: Space setup includes model, instructions, knowledge sources and tools. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- creator_permissions — Can admins limit who creates them? [supported]: Space creation/management requires delegated role permissions; Can manage grants space configuration access. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:roles, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- sharing_scope — Can assistants be shared with users, groups or everyone? [supported]: Share through Access with people/groups as Can chat or Can manage. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- catalogue — Is there an internal assistant directory? [partial]: Space Management lists configured workspaces; a dedicated employee assistant-discovery directory is not described. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- prompt_library — Are shared prompt templates available? [supported]: Admins publish Suggested Prompts with a Space; users also have personal saved prompts. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:chat.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:roles, unique-ai:unique-ai:chat

### AGT-02: Tools, actions and MCP

Judgment rule: Record built-in tools, custom actions (OpenAPI), MCP client support (local and remote servers), authentication model per tool (shared service account or per-user OAuth), and admin approval of tools. Verify one external-tool call and its access boundary.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Tools and your own API actions (OpenAPI); MCP not yet.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Built-in tools and beta MCP connectors are governed at organisation and Space levels.

Availability: beta
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique AI Conduct, Unique MCP Hub and Knowledge Base MCP; version=not specified; plan=Contracted platform with MCP beta feature flag and configured connectors; add_ons=MCP entitlement and enablement per contract; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Tenant plus downstream connector/provider regions; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Arbitrary OpenAPI action import, local stdio MCP support, each connector auth mode and universal side-effect approval are not established. Hub planned DLP/elicitation pipeline is not treated as released.

- builtin_tools — Which tools are built in? [supported]: Internal search, web search, Deep Research and Code Execution are documented; Deep Research is experimental and code has model restrictions. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:code, unique-ai:unique-ai:deepresearch.
- custom_actions — Can admins add API actions? [unknown]: Can admins add API actions? Unknown. Arbitrary OpenAPI action import, local stdio MCP support, each connector auth mode and universal side-effect approval are not established. Hub planned DLP/elicitation pipeline is not treated as released.
- mcp_client — Can it use remote MCP servers, and with what admin control? [supported]: MCP Tools for Spaces is beta, off until enabled for the organisation; connector admins and space managers can selectively expose connectors/tools. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:mcp.
- tool_auth — Do tools act as the user or as a shared account? [supported]: MCP Hub maps user hub tokens to downstream per-user OAuth tokens; secrets are injected server-side. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:hub.
- tool_approval — Can admins approve or block tools, and can users confirm actions before they run? [partial]: Admins restrict origin/connector/tool exposure. Conduct can pause for approve/deny of configured sensitive actions; it is not a universal confirmation guarantee. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:hub, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:code, unique-ai:unique-ai:deepresearch, unique-ai:unique-ai:mcp, unique-ai:unique-ai:hub, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct

### AGT-03: Web search and deep research

Judgment rule: Record web search on/off control per organisation and group, search provider, citation of web sources, deep or multi-step research, and whether queries leave the residency boundary. Admins of regulated companies often need web search off.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Web search with cited sources; admins grant it to groups.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Web search has provider/strategy controls; separate Deep Research is experimental.

Availability: beta
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No search/report fixture was run. Exact query/provider regions, contract enablement and current Deep Research production readiness remain unverified.

- web_search — Is web search available? [supported]: Real-time web search/read is a Space tool, with stable V1/V2 modes and experimental V3. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:websearch.
- admin_toggle — Can admins disable it per organisation or group? [supported]: Admins enable/disable tools per Space shared with groups. Deep Research tools are configured separately; disabling ordinary Web Search is not a universal external-search block. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:deepresearch.
- search_provider — Which search provider handles queries, and where? [partial]: Configured engines can include Google, Bing, Brave, Jina, Tavily, Firecrawl, Vertex or custom API; query context can leave the tenant. Exact provider region must be set per contract. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:websearch.
- deep_research — Is multi-step research with a report available? [supported]: Experimental tool creates multi-source research and reports. Unique engine can use internal/web sources; OpenAI-native engine requires direct OpenAI-hosted models and lacks internal sources/hosting-location control. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:deepresearch.
- web_citations — Are web sources cited? [supported]: Web answers include source references; Deep Research documents citation-linked reports. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:websearch, unique-ai:unique-ai:deepresearch.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:websearch, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:deepresearch

### AGT-04: Workflows and automation

Judgment rule: Record no-code or low-code workflows, scheduled prompts, triggers from email, forms or business systems, and multi-step chains. Name where they run and who can build them. A shared prompt template is not a workflow.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The public site labels the native workflow engine coming soon and offers n8n/custom workflow services meanwhile.

Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-23): We build workflows and automations as a service; a self-service builder is in progress.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: official-integration
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Undated public homepage checked 2026-10-26; no native workflow release verified.; plan=Public n8n/custom-workflow service offer on request; plan entitlement unspecified. Native workflow engine described as coming soon.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Workflow deployment and processing regions are not specified in the cited public homepage section.; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- workflow_builder: The native engine is announced as coming soon, without a release date. The current offer describes n8n integration run by onAI, the customer or a partner; no native self-service chain builder is counted as released.
- scheduled_tasks: No user-facing scheduled-prompt service, schedule limits or plan entitlement was verified. Internal background task machinery is insufficient evidence. Search on 2026-10-26: https://onaihq.com/, https://onaihq.com/sitemap.xml, https://onaihq.com/docs/. No additional scoped evidence established this answer.
- event_triggers: No documented email/form/business-system trigger or executed workflow was obtained; outbound webhooks do not establish inbound workflow triggers. Search on 2026-10-26: https://onaihq.com/, https://onaihq.com/sitemap.xml, https://onaihq.com/docs/. No additional scoped evidence established this answer.
- builder_audience: For the described n8n alternative, onAI, the customer or a partner may operate it, and onAI offers workflow construction on request. This does not specify a shipped native builder audience, schedule limits or event-trigger coverage.
- The public homepage is undated and combines a future native engine with an on-request service alternative. No public deployment/version or Per seat/Flat price workflow entitlement was established.

- workflow_builder — Is there a workflow or chain builder? [partial]: The native engine is announced as coming soon, without a release date. The current offer describes n8n integration run by onAI, the customer or a partner; no native self-service chain builder is counted as released. Sources: onai:onai:review-fix-public-workflow-scope-20261026.
- scheduled_tasks — Can prompts or assistants run on a schedule? [unknown]: No user-facing scheduled-prompt service, schedule limits or plan entitlement was verified. Internal background task machinery is insufficient evidence. Search on 2026-10-26: https://onaihq.com/, https://onaihq.com/sitemap.xml, https://onaihq.com/docs/. No additional scoped evidence established this answer.
- event_triggers — Can external events start a workflow? [unknown]: No documented email/form/business-system trigger or executed workflow was obtained; outbound webhooks do not establish inbound workflow triggers. Search on 2026-10-26: https://onaihq.com/, https://onaihq.com/sitemap.xml, https://onaihq.com/docs/. No additional scoped evidence established this answer.
- builder_audience — Is building aimed at business users, IT or developers? [partial]: For the described n8n alternative, onAI, the customer or a partner may operate it, and onAI offers workflow construction on request. This does not specify a shipped native builder audience, schedule limits or event-trigger coverage. Sources: onai:onai:review-fix-public-workflow-scope-20261026.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:onai:review-fix-public-workflow-scope-20261026

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Recurring Scheduled Tasks run with user permissions; current release notes label the feature experimental.

Availability: beta
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No general no-code workflow/chain builder or complete event-source trigger catalogue was established. Automated runs may stop for manual approval/questions and are subject to normal usage limits.

- workflow_builder — Is there a workflow or chain builder? [unknown]: Is there a workflow or chain builder? Unknown. No general no-code workflow/chain builder or complete event-source trigger catalogue was established. Automated runs may stop for manual approval/questions and are subject to normal usage limits.
- scheduled_tasks — Can prompts or assistants run on a schedule? [partial]: User guide labels recurring Chat/Conduct tasks beta and off by default; release2026.42 instead labels Scheduled Tasks experimental, off by default, enabled on request, and describes scheduling/eligibility fixes. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:release42, unique-ai:unique-ai:scheduled.
- event_triggers — Can external events start a workflow? [partial]: SDK documents webhook-driven applications, which require developer-hosted modules; a packaged no-code external-event builder was not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk.
- builder_audience — Is building aimed at business users, IT or developers? [partial]: Business users author recurring tasks in the UI or Conduct; developers host webhook-driven SDK modules. Availability and scheduling behaviour depend on deployed release. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:scheduled, unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:scheduled, unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct, unique-ai:unique-ai:release42

### AGT-05: Agentic task execution

Judgment rule: Record an agent mode that plans and carries out multi-step tasks with tools (browser, files, connectors), with visible steps, user confirmation of side effects and stop control. Run one fixture task (gather three documents, draft a summary, propose an email). Record interventions and what ran. A final claim of success is not proof.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

No separate autonomous agent mode; tools run in the normal chat.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Contract-enabled Conduct plans and executes multi-step tasks with visible tools and stop controls. Sensitive actions can ask for approval; separately enabled Experimental Scheduled Tasks offer automatic approval.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Conduct; version=Conduct 2026.40+; scheduling status/flags per 2026.42; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; Conduct; Scheduled Tasks separately enabled per contract and feature flag availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=Conduct; optional Scheduled Tasks feature flag; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Configured tenant/models/tools; scheduled actions run with the owner permissions and configured approval policy; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No agent fixture was run. Interactive sensitive-action approval and separately enabled unattended automatic approval are different execution modes.
- Actual tools, entitlement, approval policy and deployed release depend on the customer contract/configuration.

- agent_mode — Is there an agent mode for multi-step tasks? [supported]: Plans and executes Python/Bash, files, internal search and configured MCP tools in an autonomous workspace. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct.
- visible_steps — Are steps and tool calls shown? [supported]: Shows checklist, progress, code/tool inputs and outputs, and waiting/working indicators. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct.
- side_effect_confirmation — Must the user confirm actions with side effects? [partial]: Conduct shows approve/deny for actions configured as sensitive. The separate Scheduled Tasks guide offers Automatic or Manual approval for Chat/Conduct unattended runs. Release 2026.42 labels scheduling Experimental and feature-flagged. Mandatory human approval of every side effect is therefore not established for all configured runs. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-scheduled, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-release42.
- stop_control — Can the user stop a running task? [supported]: Stop ends the turn within seconds; completed steps/files remain and interrupted work can be resumed. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-scheduled, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-release42

### AGT-06: Programmable access

Judgment rule: Record a public API for chat, assistants and knowledge, SDKs, API authentication, rate limits and whether API use counts against the same governance (audit, budgets, model restrictions). Being an MCP client is different from exposing the product over MCP.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

API for chat and document processing on request.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Public API/Python SDK and Knowledge Base MCP are documented.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique API and Python SDK, Unique MCP Hub and Knowledge Base MCP; version=not specified; plan=Contracted APIs and KB MCP deployment; model tracking requires enablement; add_ons=KB MCP and usage-tracking enablement per contract; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Configured deployment and external client region; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No API/SDK fixture was run; complete endpoint catalogue, rate limits, budget enforcement and all-services audit parity remain unverified.

- chat_api — Is there an API for chat and assistants? [partial]: SDK exposes the Unique public API, personal/app keys and webhook signatures. Exact endpoint entitlements/rate limits require the contracted deployment. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk.
- knowledge_api — Can documents be loaded through an API? [partial]: Connector/operator docs describe ingestion and knowledge APIs; public SDK supports platform integrations. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk, unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint.
- api_governance — Do audit, budgets and model rules apply to API use? [partial]: Feature-flagged model-use tracking covers public API/SDK/agentic and Azure SDK calls with company/user/app metadata. Complete budget/model-rule enforcement across all internal services is not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:api-usage.
- mcp_server — Does the product expose itself to other agents over MCP? [supported]: Knowledge Base MCP lets external assistants search/read the Unique KB with the user permissions and admin scope restrictions. The documentation-only MCP endpoint is distinct. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:mcpkb.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk, unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint, unique-ai:unique-ai:api-usage, unique-ai:unique-ai:mcpkb

## Daily work

### WORK-01: Clients and access points

Judgment rule: List web, desktop (Windows, macOS), iOS, Android, mobile browser and browser extension separately. For each, record login with company SSO, feature gaps against web, and MDM/Intune deployability. An installable app is different from a mobile website.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The vendor offers a browser workspace requiring no installation. Native clients, extensions and managed deployment support remain unknown.

Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-22): An uncluttered interface without technical settings. At Manor, hundreds of employees use onAI every day.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat and Flat price web workspace offers; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Unspecified by source; os=Browser; operating system unspecified.

Limitations:
- Only browser access is established by public copy. No native-client absence is inferred from missing listings.

- web — Is a full web client available? [supported]: The public AI Tools section describes the employee workspace running in a current browser with nothing to install. Sources: onai:public-web-client.
- desktop_apps — Windows and macOS apps? [unknown]: No first-party Windows/macOS native client download, company-SSO support table or desktop fixture was located.
- mobile_apps — iOS and Android apps with SSO? [unknown]: No iOS/Android native app listing or mobile SSO fixture was verified. A responsive website would not establish native apps.
- browser_extension — Is there a browser extension or sidebar? [unknown]: No browser extension/sidebar release or installation instructions were located on the public product page or sitemap.
- managed_deployment — Can IT deploy and configure clients through MDM? [unknown]: No MDM/Intune deployment package, policy guide or client configuration profile was obtained.
- client_feature_gaps — Which features are missing on mobile? [unknown]: No matched desktop/mobile-browser/native-client fixture was run; no cross-client feature parity claim is made.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-web-client

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

A web workspace is documented; native-client and managed-deployment coverage is unverified.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- The public material references an app and mobile voice/browser usage without a current Windows/macOS/iOS/Android SSO/MDM matrix. Browser extension/sidebar entitlement and mobile parity remain unknown.

- web — Is a full web client available? [supported]: Public documentation describes browser chat, Space Management and administration. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:chat, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- desktop_apps — Windows and macOS apps? [unknown]: Windows and macOS apps? Unknown. The public material references an app and mobile voice/browser usage without a current Windows/macOS/iOS/Android SSO/MDM matrix. Browser extension/sidebar entitlement and mobile parity remain unknown.
- mobile_apps — iOS and Android apps with SSO? [unknown]: iOS and Android apps with SSO? Unknown. The public material references an app and mobile voice/browser usage without a current Windows/macOS/iOS/Android SSO/MDM matrix. Browser extension/sidebar entitlement and mobile parity remain unknown.
- browser_extension — Is there a browser extension or sidebar? [unknown]: Is there a browser extension or sidebar? Unknown. The public material references an app and mobile voice/browser usage without a current Windows/macOS/iOS/Android SSO/MDM matrix. Browser extension/sidebar entitlement and mobile parity remain unknown.
- managed_deployment — Can IT deploy and configure clients through MDM? [unknown]: Can IT deploy and configure clients through MDM? Unknown. The public material references an app and mobile voice/browser usage without a current Windows/macOS/iOS/Android SSO/MDM matrix. Browser extension/sidebar entitlement and mobile parity remain unknown.
- client_feature_gaps — Which features are missing on mobile? [unknown]: Which features are missing on mobile? Unknown. The public material references an app and mobile voice/browser usage without a current Windows/macOS/iOS/Android SSO/MDM matrix. Browser extension/sidebar entitlement and mobile parity remain unknown.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:chat, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent

### WORK-02: Office suite and Teams integration

Judgment rule: Record presence inside Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook and Teams (and Google Docs, Gmail), with what the assistant can do in each: read the open document, write into it, act on mail. Record extra licences and admin consent needed. A connector that searches Office files is KNOW-03, not WORK-02.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Outlook and Excel add-ins in preparation; Microsoft 365 is connected live.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: No public information found (not-published)
Support: not-published

We found no public information on this. A missing finding is not evidence that the product lacks the capability.

### WORK-03: Translation and writing

Judgment rule: Record document translation preserving layout, the translation engine (LLM or dedicated such as DeepL), glossaries, formality control, supported languages including Swiss German conventions (no ß), and rewriting/proofreading tools. Translate the shared German contract into French and Italian and record layout and glossary results.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source.

Translation with DeepL: documents with their layout, glossaries, formal or informal address. Plus adjusting style and tone.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

A beta Translator Space translates Office files and text with configurable glossaries.

Availability: beta
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No translated-contract fixture was run. Exact engine/model, formality/de-CH controls, supported glossary language pairs and layout fidelity need verification.

- document_translation — Can whole documents be translated with formatting kept? [partial]: DOCX, XLSX and PPTX document translation is documented, with possible layout disruption. PDF input is explicitly excluded in this Translator mode. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:translation.
- translation_engine — Which engine translates? [partial]: Translator V2 is a standalone AI module configured with a model; no dedicated DeepL engine was established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:translation.
- glossaries — Are company glossaries supported? [supported]: Admins can configure glossary pre/postprocessing. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:translation.
- formality_and_variants — Can formality and regional variants (de-CH) be set? [partial]: Postprocessing can change regional spelling, exemplified by US-to-UK English. Formality or de-CH-specific support was not verified. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:translation.
- writing_tools — Are dedicated rewrite and proofreading tools available? [partial]: Chat generates and iterates on text; no distinct proofreading/rewriting tool scope was established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:chat.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:translation, unique-ai:unique-ai:chat

### WORK-04: Image generation and editing

Judgment rule: Record available image models, editing (inpainting, reference images), admin control and per-image cost visibility, and licence or usage terms for generated images.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Image Studio advertises several image models, prompt-based editing and administrator controls. Its cost examples and commercial-use statement are vendor claims.

Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-22): The leading image models from OpenAI, Google, Black Forest Labs and xAI in one studio: one prompt to up to three models side by side, styles with automatic prompt enhancement, editing with up to ten reference images, cost shown before generating.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Image Studio listed in Per seat and Flat price; model entitlements unspecified; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Provider dependent; EU-only optional tier described separately; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Displayed prices and timings are illustrative UI examples, not a general price list or measured benchmark. No provider-specific output-rights contract was reviewed.

- image_generation — Can users generate images, with which models? [supported]: The page lists GPT Image, Nano Banana Pro, Imagen 4 and FLUX.3, with up to three selected models per prompt and an estimated provider cost shown before generation. Exact version IDs and live plan entitlements were not tested. Sources: onai:public-images.
- image_editing — Can users edit uploaded images? [supported]: The page describes editing an uploaded image or a previous result using a text instruction and shows image-editing models. Inpainting masks and per-model limits were not verified. Sources: onai:public-images.
- admin_control — Can admins restrict image generation? [supported]: Administrators are said to choose image models and which users may use them; optional personal-data filtering is described. Sources: onai:public-images.
- usage_terms — What usage rights apply to output? [partial]: The vendor says generated images may be used commercially. It does not supply model-specific output licences, indemnities or restrictions in this section. Sources: onai:public-image-rights.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-image-rights, onai:public-images

#### Unique AI

Verification status: No public information found (not-published)
Support: not-published

We found no public information on this. A missing finding is not evidence that the product lacks the capability.

### WORK-05: Voice and meetings

Judgment rule: Record dictation, read-aloud, live voice conversation, meeting transcription and summarisation, supported languages including Swiss German speech, and where audio is processed.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Voice input with transcription, and answers read aloud.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Voice dictation is documented with Azure Speech prerequisites; recording use is separately described in the DPA.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Read-aloud and full voice conversation, recording-specific plans/limits and verified Swiss German recognition are not established. Voice guide warns about dialects; audio route may traverse public internet/Azure backbone.

- dictation — Can users dictate prompts? [supported]: Microphone transcribes into the prompt field, with audio discarded after live transcription. Requires configured Azure AI Speech Services; EN/DE/FR/IT are listed. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:voice, unique-ai:unique-ai:voice-user.
- read_aloud — Can answers be read aloud? [unknown]: Can answers be read aloud? Unknown. Read-aloud and full voice conversation, recording-specific plans/limits and verified Swiss German recognition are not established. Voice guide warns about dialects; audio route may traverse public internet/Azure backbone.
- voice_conversation — Is a live voice mode available? [unknown]: Is a live voice mode available? Unknown. Read-aloud and full voice conversation, recording-specific plans/limits and verified Swiss German recognition are not established. Voice guide warns about dialects; audio route may traverse public internet/Azure backbone.
- meeting_summaries — Are meetings transcribed and summarised? [partial]: DPA recording use case covers audio/transcripts, optional video and GPT summaries/follow-up emails. This is a contracted recording use case, not proof every Chat plan includes meeting capture. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa.
- swiss_german_speech — Is Swiss German speech recognised? [unknown]: Is Swiss German speech recognised? Unknown. Read-aloud and full voice conversation, recording-specific plans/limits and verified Swiss German recognition are not established. Voice guide warns about dialects; audio route may traverse public internet/Azure backbone.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:voice, unique-ai:unique-ai:voice-user, unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa

### WORK-06: Data analysis and document output

Judgment rule: Record code execution for data analysis, charts, and generation of downloadable Word, Excel, PowerPoint and PDF files. Analyse the fixture Excel and request a PowerPoint summary. Record where code runs and whether files are editable.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Code execution (Python) for data analysis and charts.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Enabled Chat Code Execution and Conduct can analyse data and produce downloadable files. Selected KB documents can be preloaded into the code container; ordinary unrestricted KB retrieval is separate.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique AI Conduct; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; Chat Code Execution or Conduct; model compatibility and flags configured separately availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=Code Execution / Conduct enablement per contract; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Documented Azure code container for the Azure route; LiteLLM execution region unverified; Conduct sandbox per contracted deployment; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Selected admin-preloaded KB files are supported; this is not arbitrary sandbox retrieval of the whole Knowledge Base.
- The page lists Azure and LiteLLM-compatible model IDs but describes Azure-specific container controls. Actual provider execution routing and entitlement require deployment configuration.
- No generated-file quality/editability fixture was run.

- data_analysis — Can it analyse spreadsheets with executed code? [partial]: Chat Code Execution runs Python for CSV/XLSX analysis. The general limitation says KB files are not directly accessible, but admin configuration additionalUploadedDocuments preloads selected KB content_ids, for example templates, into the container. The documented Azure route has no outbound internet/runtime installs and a ten-file/100 MB per-file limit. The compatibility table also lists LiteLLM OpenAI models; that does not establish the same execution-region controls for every route. Conduct separately runs Python/Bash. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-code, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct.
- charts — Can it produce charts? [supported]: The Code Execution guide documents matplotlib PNG/SVG and inline charts. Its described Azure container lacks kaleido, limiting Plotly static exports; no statement about every alternative runtime is inferred. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-code.
- office_file_output — Can it create Word, Excel or PowerPoint files? [partial]: The guide documents DOCX/XLSX generation and PPTX from supplied templates, with variable presentation quality. KB templates can be supplied by the admin preload setting. Generated files remain outside Conduct source-citation/hallucination checks. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-code, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct.
- canvas_editing — Is there a document or canvas editor for iterating on output? [unknown]: No dedicated canvas editor or editable spreadsheet-to-PowerPoint fixture result was established. Downloadable file generation does not establish in-product canvas editing.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-code, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct

### WORK-07: Sharing and team spaces

Judgment rule: Record chat sharing (link, user, group), shared projects or team spaces, channels or group chat with AI, and commenting. Test sharing a chat with a colleague in another group and record what the recipient sees, including knowledge they lack access to.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Share chats with colleagues by link.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Shared Chats is GA in release 2026.42, with company settings and a per-Space toggle. Simultaneous group conversation and recipient source-permission handling remain unverified.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=2026.42 or later; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; Shared Chats and Spaces; sharing settings and deployed release availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- A shared conversation is not evidence of simultaneous group participation or recipient access to every source.
- No cross-group shared-chat permission fixture was run.

- share_chats — Can chats be shared inside the organisation? [supported]: Release 2026.42 makes whole-chat sharing GA and on by default for companies, while each Space still needs its Shared chat toggle. Explicit existing company preferences are preserved. Owners can search recipients and copy share links. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-release42.
- team_spaces — Are shared projects or workspaces available? [partial]: Admins publish shared Spaces with people/group Can chat and Can manage roles. These share agent configuration/knowledge, not necessarily a conversation. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- group_chat — Can several people chat together with the AI? [unknown]: Whole-chat sharing is documented. A simultaneous multi-person AI conversation, collaborative commenting or live co-editing mode was not established or tested.
- share_permission_boundary — Does sharing respect the recipient's access to sources? [unknown]: Whole-chat sharing is documented, but whether a recipient can open every cited source or inherits source permissions was not established in the retrieved release/Space documentation. No cross-group fixture was run.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-release42

### WORK-08: Interface languages and accessibility

Judgment rule: Record UI languages, focusing on German, French, Italian and English, with translation quality observed (complete, partial, machine-translated). Record response language handling and WCAG conformance statements.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Interface in German and English, more languages in preparation.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Current release notes document German, French and Swiss German UI language behaviour; completeness and accessibility remain unverified.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Release notes describe locale fixes, not a full UI audit or conformance statement. No authenticated UI was reviewed.

- ui_languages — Which UI languages are offered? [partial]: Release2026.42 describes German/French label translations and selected-language login/notices/errors/side-panels, including Swiss German spellings. A complete language matrix was not provided. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:release42.
- dach_language_quality — Are German, French and Italian UIs complete and natural? [unknown]: Are German, French and Italian UIs complete and natural? Unknown. DE/FR/IT/EN voice and text-language capabilities are not a UI-localisation matrix. No authenticated user/admin language-quality pass or current WCAG conformance statement was obtained.
- accessibility_statement — Is there a WCAG conformance statement? [unknown]: Is there a WCAG conformance statement? Unknown. DE/FR/IT/EN voice and text-language capabilities are not a UI-localisation matrix. No authenticated user/admin language-quality pass or current WCAG conformance statement was obtained.
- admin_ui_languages — Is the admin interface available in German? [unknown]: Is the admin interface available in German? Unknown. DE/FR/IT/EN voice and text-language capabilities are not a UI-localisation matrix. No authenticated user/admin language-quality pass or current WCAG conformance statement was obtained.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:release42

## Administration and governance

### ADM-01: Single sign-on and authentication

Judgment rule: Record SAML, OIDC, Microsoft Entra ID, Google, LDAP, MFA enforcement, conditional-access compatibility, domain verification and plan restrictions. Test one SSO login on a trial where possible.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Public copy offers Microsoft, Google, OIDC and LDAP sign-in, with published plan differences. Native SAML, MFA enforcement and conditional-access behavior were not verified.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: official-integration
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat: Microsoft/Google; Flat price: Microsoft/Google/OIDC/LDAP; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Identity-provider and deployment regions unspecified; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No successful login or policy enforcement fixture was run. SAML and MFA are left unknown rather than inferred from corporate-login marketing.

- sso_protocols — Which SSO protocols and identity providers work? [supported]: The current page lists Microsoft Entra ID, Google, any OpenID Connect provider and LDAP. It does not establish native SAML support; generic corporate SSO language is insufficient. Sources: onai:public-pricing-display-20261026.
- sso_plan — Which plan includes SSO? [supported]: Per seat lists Entra ID and Google. Flat price lists Entra ID, Google, OIDC and LDAP. These are published offer terms, not an executed SSO fixture. Sources: onai:public-pricing-display-20261026.
- mfa — Can MFA be enforced? [unknown]: No onAI-native MFA requirement or tenant-enforced IdP-MFA setup was verified. IdP capabilities are not automatically onAI enforcement.
- conditional_access — Do Entra conditional-access policies apply? [unknown]: No Entra conditional-access compatibility statement or test policy/login result was obtained.
- domain_capture — Can the company claim its email domain? [unknown]: No domain-claim/verification workflow, automatic capture policy or ownership-transfer fixture was established from public material.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-pricing-display-20261026

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Zitadel supports Entra OIDC, generic OIDC and SAML across documented deployment types.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Entra conditional-access compatibility, verified domain capture and tariff-specific SSO/MFA entitlements were not tested/documented.

- sso_protocols — Which SSO protocols and identity providers work? [supported]: Setup guides explicitly cover Entra ID OIDC, generic OIDC and SAML, including IdP metadata for closed networks. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sso.
- sso_plan — Which plan includes SSO? [partial]: Compliance matrix lists SSO for multi-tenant, single-tenant, client-hosted and on-premise modes. Numeric tariff prerequisites are not public. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sso, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance.
- mfa — Can MFA be enforced? [partial]: Hosted compliance matrix lists enforced 2FA; SSO setup delegates authentication to the external IdP. Exact customer MFA policy controls need verification. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sso, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance.
- conditional_access — Do Entra conditional-access policies apply? [unknown]: Do Entra conditional-access policies apply? Unknown. Entra conditional-access compatibility, verified domain capture and tariff-specific SSO/MFA entitlements were not tested/documented.
- domain_capture — Can the company claim its email domain? [unknown]: Can the company claim its email domain? Unknown. Entra conditional-access compatibility, verified domain capture and tariff-specific SSO/MFA entitlements were not tested/documented.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sso, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance

### ADM-02: User provisioning and lifecycle

Judgment rule: Record SCIM, just-in-time provisioning, group sync from the identity provider, deprovisioning effects (chats, assistants, knowledge ownership transfer) and licence assignment. Deprovision a test user and record what happens to their content.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Users are created automatically at their first SSO sign-in and groups come from the directory; no SCIM.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

SCIM, group sync and SAML automatic user creation are documented.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Leaver-content ownership transfer, deletion effects and licence assignment/reclamation are not specified; no deprovisioning fixture was run.

- scim — Is SCIM provisioning supported? [supported]: Unique supplies SCIM URL/key for IdP synchronisation, with an Entra guide. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:scim.
- group_sync — Are identity-provider groups synced? [supported]: SCIM syncs users/groups; SSO group claims can also sync on login, requiring optional Graph group permission/admin consent. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:scim, unique-ai:unique-ai:sso.
- jit_provisioning — Are users created at first login? [supported]: SAML setup explicitly enables automatic creation/update and account creation. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:sso.
- deprovisioning — What happens to a removed user's data and shared assets? [unknown]: What happens to a removed user's data and shared assets? Unknown. Leaver-content ownership transfer, deletion effects and licence assignment/reclamation are not specified; no deprovisioning fixture was run.
- seat_assignment — Can admins assign and reclaim seats? [unknown]: Can admins assign and reclaim seats? Unknown. Leaver-content ownership transfer, deletion effects and licence assignment/reclamation are not specified; no deprovisioning fixture was run.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:scim, unique-ai:unique-ai:sso

### ADM-03: Roles, groups and feature permissions

Judgment rule: Record admin roles, delegated admins, groups, per-feature permissions (web search, image generation, connectors, file upload, agents), separation of subsidiaries or departments, and enforcement. Test one disabled feature for one group.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source.

Roles and groups; admins decide per group which features (for example Image Studio, translator, web search) are used.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Four role/access layers separate identity, feature, Space and knowledge controls.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No two-user disabled-feature test was run. Full cross-Space per-group controls and legal-entity separation require contracted setup.

- admin_roles — Which admin roles exist, and can admin rights be delegated? [supported]: IAM owner/viewer/org-manager plus Unique application roles delegate administration; Space Can manage grants local configuration. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:roles, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- groups — Can permissions be set per group? [supported]: Users/groups receive Space and ScopeAccess permissions. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:roles.
- feature_toggles — Which features can be switched on or off per group? [partial]: Tools and upload settings are configured per Space, then Spaces shared to groups. A global group-feature matrix is not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- multi_entity — Can subsidiaries or departments be separated within one contract? [partial]: Compliance docs describe workspace isolation for departments/client engagements. Multi-subsidiary contractual/billing boundaries are not specified. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:roles, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance

### ADM-04: Usage and adoption analytics

Judgment rule: Record dashboards for active users, usage by feature, model, group and assistant, export, and privacy controls (aggregation, pseudonymisation, works-council-friendly settings). Distinguish aggregate adoption metrics from per-person monitoring.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Usage reports by model, feature and person.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Analytics exports cover adoption, assistants, models and tools with privacy controls.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Exact group breakdowns, every dashboard entitlement and suppression beyond exported identifiers need verification.

- adoption_dashboard — Is there an adoption dashboard? [supported]: Reports cover daily/weekly/monthly active users, assistant interactions and document reference statistics. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:analytics.
- breakdowns — Can usage be broken down by group, model, feature and assistant? [partial]: Detailed exports include assistant/model, tool calls, skills, cost and tokens. Group and cost-centre breakdowns were not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:analytics.
- export — Can usage data be exported? [supported]: Admins request and download reports with date/assistant filtering; model usage supports CSV. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:analytics, unique-ai:unique-ai:cost.
- privacy_modes — Can per-person reporting be limited or pseudonymised? [supported]: Environment flags anonymise export emails, optionally with stable pseudonyms; detailed exports respect organisation settings. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:analytics.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:analytics, unique-ai:unique-ai:cost

### ADM-05: Spend controls and cost allocation

Judgment rule: Record cost visibility per user, group and cost centre, budgets and their behaviour (alert, block, downgrade model), pooled credits, and chargeback exports. Test a small budget on a trial where possible. Distinguish billed amounts, estimates and unavailable amounts.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Cost limits per organisation and per person.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Off-by-default beta cost management offers estimated spend and enforced daily caps.

Availability: beta
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No small-budget fixture was run. Estimates are configurable cost-sheet values, not a public billing tariff; cost-centre and full invoice reconciliation remain gaps.

- cost_visibility — Can admins see cost or consumption per user and group? [partial]: Tracks estimated USD/input/output tokens by user, model, assistant/app; a billed invoice reconciliation or group cost view is not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:cost.
- budgets — Can budgets be set per user or group? [supported]: Company fallback, group and user daily USD caps; user override first, highest applicable group limit next. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:cost.
- budget_enforcement — Does reaching a budget alert, block or downgrade? [supported]: Before the next call, accumulated daily spend at cap blocks the model call; resets at local midnight. Docs warn caps may break background-job SLAs. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:cost.
- chargeback — Can costs be exported per cost centre? [partial]: CSV exports contain user/app/assistant/model/token/cost metadata, with privacy controls. Cost-centre attribution is not documented. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:cost.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:cost

### ADM-06: Audit logs and compliance export

Judgment rule: Record which events are logged (logins, admin changes, prompts, responses, file access, connector queries), retention, export or SIEM streaming, and eDiscovery/legal hold. Use the word audit only with a defined retention and integrity model.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Audit logging can be switched on; a built-in SIEM connection is not included.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

API audit events, detailed interaction exports and Single-Tenant security-event streaming are documented. A single authoritative retention period for the customer's audit records is not established.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique API and Python SDK; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; Audit Logs, Analytics and Single-Tenant Security Events Export availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=SEE for the contracted Single-Tenant deployment; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- API security-event records, detailed prompt/answer interaction exports, SEE replay and generic operational logging are separate sources/data flows. Their public retention figures are not substituted for each other.
- No executed customer retention override or legal-hold/eDiscovery fixture was inspected.

- admin_events — Are admin and security events logged? [supported]: Event logging covers privileged public/internal API interactions; many self-identity/chat operations are excluded. Basic mode is default; verbose content mode is opt-in. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:audit.
- content_logging — Can prompts and answers be retained for compliance, and is it configurable? [supported]: Detailed chat interaction exports contain prompts/answers for authorised admins and respect configured privacy. Verbose event logging can include CID but is discouraged. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:analytics, unique-ai:unique-ai:audit.
- siem_export — Can logs stream to a SIEM or be exported? [supported]: SEE offers Single-Tenant Azure Defender and Activity events via Event Hub to Sentinel/Splunk, seven-day replay. It excludes tenant-level Entra events and is not a prompt-content audit stream. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:security-export.
- ediscovery — Are eDiscovery and legal hold supported? [unknown]: No public legal-hold/eDiscovery workflow or complete event-log immutability design was established.
- log_retention — How long are logs kept? [unknown]: Different sources describe different record scopes. The API event guide gives basic-mode MT events 90 days and ST events five years, including post-termination ST retention. DPA 3.15 says audit logs ten years without mapping its audit-log category to those API events. The generic hosted policy says logging up to one year after termination or longer if legally required. SEE has a separate seven-day Event Hub replay window, not the lifetime of all audit records. No customer agreement or authoritative record-class/precedence mapping was retrieved; the applicable audit retention period is unknown.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-audit, unique-ai:unique-ai:analytics, unique-ai:unique-ai:security-export, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-dpa, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-retention

### ADM-07: Data loss prevention and personal data

Judgment rule: Record detection and handling of personal and confidential data before it reaches a model: redaction, masking, blocking, warning. Record integration with Purview, Netskope or similar, and whether filtering runs locally or at a third party. Send a fixture prompt with a Swiss AHV number and IBAN and record the outcome.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

For selected web search providers and image models, automatic redaction of sensitive text can be switched on.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

DLP is primarily customer infrastructure and integration; it is not a verified default native redaction feature.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Default prompt/file PII detection, specific redaction/block behaviour, custom patterns, supported Purview/Netskope policies and native AHV/IBAN handling were not established or tested. Data redaction docs concern retention, not PII masking.

- pii_detection — Is personal data detected in prompts and files? [unknown]: Is personal data detected in prompts and files? Unknown. Default prompt/file PII detection, specific redaction/block behaviour, custom patterns, supported Purview/Netskope policies and native AHV/IBAN handling were not established or tested. Data redaction docs concern retention, not PII masking.
- pii_action — Is it redacted, masked, blocked or only warned? [unknown]: Is it redacted, masked, blocked or only warned? Unknown. Default prompt/file PII detection, specific redaction/block behaviour, custom patterns, supported Purview/Netskope policies and native AHV/IBAN handling were not established or tested. Data redaction docs concern retention, not PII masking.
- custom_patterns — Can admins add custom patterns or terms? [unknown]: Can admins add custom patterns or terms? Unknown. Default prompt/file PII detection, specific redaction/block behaviour, custom patterns, supported Purview/Netskope policies and native AHV/IBAN handling were not established or tested. Data redaction docs concern retention, not PII masking.
- dlp_integration — Does it integrate with an existing DLP product? [partial]: Documents customer HTTPS proxy/interceptor DLP and post-chat Analytics API scanning; Compliance Layer says pre-LLM calls can be implemented. Multi-Tenant matrix explicitly excludes DLP integration. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:dlp, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance.
- filter_location — Where does filtering run? [partial]: Proxy inspection runs in customer egress infrastructure; Analytics API supports customer post-chat inspection. A deployment-specific pre-LLM service may be implemented. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:dlp, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:dlp, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance

### ADM-08: AI policy and guardrails

Judgment rule: Record organisation-wide system instructions, acceptable-use notices and acknowledgement, content filters, topic restrictions, AI-output labelling, and admin visibility of policy violations. Separate enforced policy from instructions the model is expected to follow.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Administrators set notice banners and system instructions for the AI.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Space instructions/banners and customer-specific login terms are documented.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Org-wide instruction enforcement, customer content-filter policy controls and administrator violation reports are not established. Prompt guidance is not guaranteed enforcement.

- org_instructions — Can admins set organisation-wide instructions? [partial]: Admins set Space-level system instructions and persistent banners. A mandatory organisation-wide instruction hierarchy is not specified. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent.
- usage_notice — Can users be required to accept a usage policy? [supported]: First login requires terms acceptance; custom terms/editing/deactivation depend on MSA eligibility and admin GraphQL role. Acceptance/version data can be exported. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:policy.
- content_filters — Are content filters configurable? [partial]: Single-tenant Azure prompts pass through Azure content filters; Compliance matrix marks hosted modes with content filtering. Customer filter configuration and scope remain unspecified. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:single, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance.
- violation_reporting — Are policy hits visible to admins? [unknown]: Are policy hits visible to admins? Unknown. Org-wide instruction enforcement, customer content-filter policy controls and administrator violation reports are not established. Prompt guidance is not guaranteed enforcement.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:policy, unique-ai:unique-ai:single, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance

## Data protection and sovereignty

### DATA-01: Hosting location and data residency

Judgment rule: Record country or region separately for chat storage, files and indexes, model inference, backups, logs and telemetry, and support access. Name the cloud provider. Record whether residency is default, a paid option or plan-dependent. "EU data boundary" programmes are recorded with their documented exceptions.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source.

Swiss contracting party. onAI runs on servers in Europe. On request a dedicated server, or onAI runs on your own servers (on-premises).

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Documentation offers CH North multitenant hosting and selectable single/customer-hosted regions, with model processing configured separately. The customer's binding residency schedule and full backup/log/support map remain unknown.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique API and Python SDK; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; hosted or customer-hosted platform; separately selected model/tool routes availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Documented options: CH North hosted MT; selected ST/customer region; provider/SKU/tool inference region separately configured; actual contracted boundaries unverified; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Available architecture/region options are not a signed residency schedule. Storage, model inference, backups/logs, support access and external tools must be scoped separately.
- DPA CH-storage and chosen-location statements are not reconciled by silently treating one as the current customer contract.

- storage_region — Where are chats, files and indexes stored? [partial]: The deployment matrix documents Azure Switzerland North for hosted multitenant and chosen supported regions for Single Tenant. Tenant storage includes PostgreSQL, documents and vector data. These are configuration options; no customer-specific storage schedule was inspected. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-compliance, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-keys.
- inference_region — Where do model calls run, per provider? [partial]: The model catalogue separates Azure regional/Data Zone/Global SKUs and external provider routes, with some Swiss deployments and some global-only services. Actual selected provider/SKU/tool routing must be configured for the contracted deployment. CH storage is not a verified CH inference guarantee. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-models, unique-ai:unique-ai:deepresearch.
- backups_logs_region — Where are backups, logs and telemetry? [partial]: Single-tenant backup resources follow the configured landing-zone design and SEE sends events to a separately selected consumer region. An exhaustive physical replica/backup/log/telemetry country matrix was not retrieved. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-single, unique-ai:unique-ai:security-export.
- support_access_region — From where can vendor staff access data? [unknown]: The public DPA gives need-to-know access controls and customer-controlled on-premises support, but not an exhaustive physical country list for vendor/subprocessor support access. Office addresses are not used as support-access locations.
- swiss_hosting — Is Swiss hosting available? [partial]: CH North is a documented hosted-MT option, and selected-region ST can be Swiss. This records available deployment options, not the customer's end-to-end storage/inference/support contract. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-compliance, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-models.
- residency_plan — Which plan or option provides residency? [unknown]: DPA 6.1 says storage stays in Switzerland, while its Appendix A allows a client-chosen Microsoft location and current platform docs offer selected jurisdictions. No current customer MSA, precedence clause or deployment schedule was inspected to resolve the binding scope. A contractual CH-wide residency commitment is not asserted.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-compliance, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-models, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-keys, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-single, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-dpa, unique-ai:unique-ai:security-export, unique-ai:unique-ai:deepresearch

### DATA-02: Deployment options

Judgment rule: Record multi-tenant SaaS, dedicated single-tenant instance, deployment in the customer's cloud account, on-premise and air-gapped as separate options with plan and availability. Record which features are missing in each mode, who operates it, and the documented seat or contract threshold for each mode, which can differ from the enterprise plan threshold (e.g. dedicated SaaS from 2,000 seats, own cloud from 5,000). A local-network connector or gateway that reaches on-prem data from a vendor-hosted platform is KNOW-03, not on-premise deployment.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source.

Swiss contracting party. onAI runs on servers in Europe. On request a dedicated server, or onAI runs on your own servers (on-premises).

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Current docs offer shared SaaS, dedicated instances, customer cloud and customer-operated on-premise/air-gapped modes.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No deployed tenant was inspected. Seat/contract thresholds and an exhaustive offline feature-parity matrix remain unknown; docs establish an option, not universal entitlement.

- multi_tenant_saas — Is a shared SaaS offered? [supported]: Installation overview lists Multi Tenant on Unique cloud. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:install.
- dedicated_instance — Is a dedicated single-tenant instance offered, from what size? [partial]: Unique-managed Single Tenant has its own Azure landing zone separated from other customers. Minimum seats/contract value are unpublished. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:single.
- customer_cloud — Can it run in the customer's own cloud account, from what size? [partial]: Operator guide documents deployment in customer cloud account with Unique software/support; cloud-specific rollout is contracted. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:operators.
- on_premise — Can the whole platform run on customer infrastructure, from what size? [partial]: Customer provisions/manages infrastructure on own premises, may run own models and can exclude Unique access. Minimum commitment not published. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:onpremsecurity.
- air_gapped — Can it run without internet access? [partial]: IT-operator overview explicitly offers a full air-gapped on-premise deployment. Compatibility and feature limitations depend on customer setup. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:operators, unique-ai:unique-ai:onpremsecurity.
- mode_feature_gaps — Which features are missing outside SaaS? [partial]: Compliance matrix separates SSO/content filter/DLP/PAM/key capabilities by mode. Azure Chat Code Execution/voice and external web/providers require those services and cannot be assumed in an isolated environment. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance, unique-ai:unique-ai:code, unique-ai:unique-ai:voice.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:install, unique-ai:unique-ai:single, unique-ai:unique-ai:operators, unique-ai:unique-ai:onpremsecurity, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance, unique-ai:unique-ai:code, unique-ai:unique-ai:voice

### DATA-03: Training use and provider retention

Judgment rule: Record whether customer content trains vendor or provider models, by plan and default; zero-data-retention arrangements with model providers; abuse-monitoring retention and human review; and the model provider's terms that apply. A "no training" claim on a marketing page is `vendor-claimed` until the contract or DPA says so.

#### onAI

Verification status: Sourced (sourced)
Support: partial

The site publishes general no-training copy and advertises an optional provider zero-retention tier. Their contractual applicability to Per seat and Flat price is unverified; no plan-specific provider-retention or human-review guarantee is established.

Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-23): Your data is not used to train AI models; we only use providers that exclude this by contract.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Product-wide marketing only; Per seat/Flat price contractual applicability and EU-only tier eligibility unverified.; add_ons=EU-only processing and zero-retention option, terms unspecified; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Per-provider default unknown; optional EU tier claimed; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Remains public-candidate because the public statements are not mapped to a named plan contract. No no-training or zero-retention entitlement is inferred for either plan.
- The existence of a requestable DPA is not review of its terms; provider retention and human review remain explicit gaps.

- vendor_training — Does the vendor train on customer content? [partial]: The public product page makes a general no-training statement about prompts, files and answers. It is recorded only as unqualified marketing copy: no retrieved DPA or public plan mapping establishes the contractual rule for Per seat or Flat price. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps.
- provider_training — Do model providers train on it under this product's contracts? [unknown]: No provider contract or Per seat/Flat price policy mapping was retrieved. General no-training marketing does not establish model-provider contract terms, exceptions or enforcement. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps.
- provider_retention — How long do model providers keep prompts, including for abuse monitoring? [unknown]: No provider-by-provider prompt/abuse-monitoring retention period, default or exception schedule was obtained.
- zero_retention — Is zero data retention available, and on which plan? [unknown]: The page advertises an optional EU-only AI-processing tier with provider zero retention, but its applicable base plan, providers, exceptions and contractual terms were not retrieved. This is not counted as an established Per seat or Flat price entitlement. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps.
- human_review — Can provider staff review content? [unknown]: No product-specific provider human-review/abuse-monitoring policy or opt-out contract was retrieved.

Checked 2026-10-21; not separately cross-checked; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Hosted Azure documentation says no model training and disabled Microsoft prompt storage/human review; other provider routes require separate terms.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No signed Azure amendment was inspected. Retention and review conditions for Anthropic, Gemini, Together, xAI and direct OpenAI research remain unverified; do not generalise the Azure-only policy.

- vendor_training — Does the vendor train on customer content? [supported]: Hosted retention policy says no customer data is used for AI/neural-network training. Public terms allow service development and anonymised metadata use; that is not a blanket prohibition of all secondary processing. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:retention, unique-ai:unique-ai:terms.
- provider_training — Do model providers train on it under this product's contracts? [partial]: Hosted Azure deployment is separate from public OpenAI and training is excluded. Other catalogue providers/direct OpenAI research need their applicable customer terms. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:retention, unique-ai:unique-ai:models, unique-ai:unique-ai:deepresearch.
- provider_retention — How long do model providers keep prompts, including for abuse monitoring? [supported]: For hosted Azure OpenAI, documents/prompts/answers process in memory only, with logging/human-review opt-out. Ordinary application chats persist in Unique databases. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:retention.
- zero_retention — Is zero data retention available, and on which plan? [partial]: Hosted Azure model calls use no provider content storage per opt-out; this is not zero retention of Unique application history, logs or other provider routes. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:retention.
- human_review — Can provider staff review content? [partial]: Hosted Azure guide says Microsoft prompt/response human review is disabled. Vendor staff need-to-know access and alternate model-provider review conditions are separate. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:retention, unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:retention, unique-ai:unique-ai:terms, unique-ai:unique-ai:models, unique-ai:unique-ai:deepresearch, unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa

### DATA-04: Retention and deletion

Judgment rule: Record default retention for chats, files, indexes and logs; admin-configured retention; user deletion; deletion after contract end; and deletion confirmation.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Users delete their own chats at any time. At contract end we delete all of your organisation's data, with confirmation on request.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Chat content clearing, chat uploads, KB documents, contract-end content deletion, recoverable files, backups and audit records have separate policies. No common purge deadline is established for all copies.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique API and Python SDK; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; Chat, Knowledge Base and hosted retention configuration; customer-hosted policy separately controlled availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Contracted storage/provider region; hosted-policy timings not extended to every customer-hosted system; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Hosted content policy expressly permits contract-specific variation. Its timings do not define API/DPA audit-record retention.
- No tenant configuration, customer MSA, final backup purge or external-provider deletion fixture was inspected.

- default_retention — What is retained and for how long by default? [partial]: The chat-upload guide describes an admin-configured expiry, typically two weeks, for chat uploads. Hosted policy lists no minimum for KB/blob/vector/database content. Neither figure defines audit-event retention or proves a tenant's configured default. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:files, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-retention.
- admin_retention — Can admins set retention periods? [supported]: DATA_RETENTION_IN_DAYS drives the daily midnight chat-content clearing job; unset/zero disables it. This clears the content categories named by the redaction guide, not all uploads, KB, external tool records or audit events. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:redaction.
- user_deletion — Can users delete their chats and files permanently? [partial]: The redaction guide says deleting a chat removes its Unique chat-content copy and marks the chat record deleted. Separate upload, KB, external-tool, soft-delete, backup and audit policies are not collapsed into that action. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:redaction.
- contract_end_deletion — What is deleted at contract end, and when? [partial]: For Unique-hosted ordinary content, the published policy states a standard 30-day post-termination period unless the customer contract differs. It separately describes recoverable files for 30 days after deletion and database backups for two further weeks. DPA 6.1 requires return/deletion subject to legal record-keeping. Audit-log classes and their contractual lifetime remain unknown under ADM-06; this is not a deadline for deletion of every copy. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-retention, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-dpa.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:files, unique-ai:unique-ai:redaction, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-retention, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-dpa

### DATA-05: Sub-processors and foreign-law exposure

Judgment rule: Record the published sub-processor list with countries, change-notification rules, the vendor's and parent company's jurisdiction, transfer mechanisms (EU-US Data Privacy Framework, Swiss-US DPF, SCCs) and the vendor's documented position on foreign government access requests (e.g. US CLOUD Act). Record facts, not a legal assessment.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Telesoft AG is publicly identified in Switzerland. A product subprocessor/country/change-notice schedule and government-access policy were not obtained; website processors are scoped separately.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=All public offers for entity identity; product processor terms unspecified; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Vendor Switzerland; product processor and parent countries unknown; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No legal exposure verdict is made. Product contracts and website privacy terms must remain separate.

- subprocessor_list — Is a dated sub-processor list published? [unknown]: The homepage advertises a public subprocessor list but no product list/document was linked or retrieved through the sitemap and legal pages. The dated website policy is not the workspace processor list. Sources: onai:public-compliance-display-20261026, onai:public-website-privacy-display-20261026.
- subprocessor_countries — Which countries do sub-processors operate in? [unknown]: The product provider/country matrix is unknown. The website policy lists providers in Slovenia, Estonia, Ireland and the USA for website purposes only; these cannot be treated as product coverage. Sources: onai:public-website-privacy-display-20261026.
- change_notification — Are customers notified of sub-processor changes? [unknown]: No product subprocessor change-notice period, objection rule or notification subscription was located.
- parent_jurisdiction — Which jurisdiction governs the vendor and its parent? [partial]: The imprint names Telesoft AG at a Swiss address and a Swiss VAT registration. A parent-company ownership/jurisdiction record was not obtained. Sources: onai:public-imprint-display-20261026.
- transfer_mechanism — Which transfer mechanism applies to non-EU/CH processing? [unknown]: Website processing cites SCCs and provider-dependent DPF. No corresponding product AI-provider/data-transfer agreement was retrieved. Sources: onai:public-website-privacy-display-20261026.
- government_access_policy — Is there a published government-access or transparency policy? [unknown]: No product government-access/transparency policy or dated request report was found. Swiss incorporation alone does not establish foreign-law immunity.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-compliance-display-20261026, onai:public-imprint-display-20261026, onai:public-website-privacy-display-20261026

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The dated public DPA lists Microsoft, but a complete applicable current subprocessor/country schedule for all contracted model/tool routes was not retrieved. A technical provider catalogue is not substituted for that legal schedule.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique API and Python SDK; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; current platform infrastructure and enabled model/tool integrations availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Actual customer provider/country/transfer schedule unverified; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- The provider catalogue establishes technical choices, not each party's processor role or the legal schedule for a customer contract.
- No sales contact, executed current MSA or nonpublic schedule was obtained.

- subprocessor_list — Is a dated sub-processor list published? [unknown]: The July 2025 public DPA Appendix A lists Microsoft for infrastructure, Cognitive/Azure OpenAI and email. The current technical catalogue offers other provider/tool routes, which may have different contractual roles. No applicable complete current legal schedule or executed customer supplement was retrieved; the Microsoft-only list is not presented as complete.
- subprocessor_countries — Which countries do sub-processors operate in? [unknown]: DPA Appendix A names CH or a client-chosen Microsoft location; technical model routes separately include regional and global processing. A complete current legal provider/country and support-access schedule for the chosen deployment was not retrieved.
- change_notification — Are customers notified of sub-processor changes? [unknown]: No applicable current processor-change notification/objection clause for the customer's full provider schedule was retrieved from the DPA or current contract-access documentation.
- parent_jurisdiction — Which jurisdiction governs the vendor and its parent? [partial]: The current contact page identifies Unique AI AG in Switzerland and regional entities. The public DPA uses Unique AG. Ultimate parent/beneficial-owner jurisdiction and a customer-specific contracting entity were not independently established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:contact, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-dpa.
- transfer_mechanism — Which transfer mechanism applies to non-EU/CH processing? [unknown]: No complete customer-content transfer-instrument mapping per non-CH/EU provider was retrieved. The website visitor privacy policy is not substituted for customer-content terms.
- government_access_policy — Is there a published government-access or transparency policy? [unknown]: No current customer-content government-request/transparency policy was retrieved for the complete contracted provider chain. General banking/DPA assurances do not establish such a policy.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-dpa, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-models, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-governance, unique-ai:unique-ai:contact

### DATA-06: Contracts and regulatory coverage

Judgment rule: Record DPA availability and form (click-through, negotiable), reference to Swiss revDSG and GDPR, governing law and court, EU AI Act documentation (provider or deployer role, transparency materials), and sector-specific materials (FINMA outsourcing, banking secrecy, public sector). No compliance verdict.

#### onAI

Verification status: Sourced (sourced)
Support: partial

The general public DPA inquiry path is established. DPA content, Swiss DSG/GDPR clauses, AI Act material and plan-specific document entitlements remain unverified for Per seat and Flat price; no compliance conclusion is drawn.

Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-23): Data processing agreement under the Swiss FADP and the GDPR on request.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=General DPA inquiry/compliance copy only; Per seat/Flat price document entitlement unverified.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Swiss entity; claimed Swiss DSG/GDPR coverage; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Remains public-candidate. A contact action and general legal labels do not establish plan-scoped contract terms or supplied regulatory documentation.
- No product agreement, legal forum or sector-specific contract package was reviewed.

- dpa — Is a DPA available, and is it negotiable? [partial]: A general Request the DPA contact action is public. It establishes an inquiry path, not that a particular DPA, execution procedure or negotiability option is included in Per seat or Flat price; no contract was retrieved and no sales contact was made. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps.
- revdsg_gdpr — Does the DPA cover revDSG and GDPR? [unknown]: The website refers generally to Swiss DSG and GDPR, but no product DPA text or plan applicability was retrieved. Its actual revDSG/GDPR clauses and scope cannot be established from the vendor entity or marketing labels. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps, onai:public-imprint.
- governing_law — Which law and court govern the contract? [unknown]: A Swiss contracting entity does not determine governing law or court. No product agreement specifying either was obtained.
- ai_act_materials — Is EU AI Act documentation provided? [unknown]: The public page advertises AI Act transparency labels. No provider/deployer-role documentation, technical material, conformity scope or Per seat/Flat price delivery entitlement was obtained. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps.
- sector_materials — Are FINMA or other sector materials provided? [unknown]: No FINMA outsourcing, banking secrecy, public-sector or regulated-industry contract package was obtained.

Checked 2026-10-21; not separately cross-checked; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-imprint, onai:review-contract-plan-gaps

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

A public DPA and finance-specific compliance material are available; actual contractual amendments were not inspected.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- DPA negotiability and signed sector amendments, product-specific EU AI Act roles and exact sector assurance scope remain unverified. This records materials, not a compliance verdict.

- dpa — Is a DPA available, and is it negotiable? [partial]: DPA accepts click-through/use or signature and defines Unique as processor for hosted MT/ST. Negotiability is not specified. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa.
- revdsg_gdpr — Does the DPA cover revDSG and GDPR? [partial]: DPA addresses GDPR, Swiss FDPIC oversight and MSA-defined laws; Compliance Layer identifies nFDAP/Swiss M329 amendment. Exact signed revDSG/GDPR scope requires MSA. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance.
- governing_law — Which law and court govern the contract? [supported]: DPA 7 specifies Swiss substantive law and Zürich 1 courts unless mandatory GDPR/MSA otherwise. Public ToS similarly names Swiss law. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa, unique-ai:unique-ai:terms.
- ai_act_materials — Is EU AI Act documentation provided? [partial]: Trust centre describes per-use-case conformity assessments; ISO42001 and AI governance material are public. A complete provider/deployer AI Act technical file is not established. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:trust, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance.
- sector_materials — Are FINMA or other sector materials provided? [partial]: Compliance Layer names Microsoft M453 FINMA audit-rights amendment, M744 professional/banking secrecy and M329 CH-DPA for Unique-hosted deployments. Actual annexes and current signed scope are not public. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance, unique-ai:unique-ai:terms, unique-ai:unique-ai:trust

### DATA-07: Certifications and attestations

Judgment rule: Record each certificate or report separately: ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, 27701, 42001; SOC 2 Type I/II with period; BSI C5; TISAX; national schemes. Record issuer, scope (which product and entity), validity and access route. A cloud provider's certificate does not certify the product.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

onAI is not currently ISO 27001 certified and has no SOC 2 report.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

New public 2026 ATTESTA renewals establish ISO27001 and ISO9001 validity to 31 May 2029; the public TÜV SÜD ISO42001 certificate runs to 6 March 2028. SOC2 Type2 is vendor-documented, with full report evidence NDA-gated.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique API and Python SDK; version=ATTESTA 10 June 2026 renewals; TÜV SÜD 7 March 2025 certificate; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; platform assurance; certificates cover the named legal entity and stated scopes, not every module/provider availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Certificates name Unique AG, Zurich, Switzerland; module/provider coverage depends on the stated audit scope; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Current ISO27001/9001 evidence is the 2026 renewal plus matching register entries; the stale website-linked PDF is not used to deny current certification.
- SOC chronology and access process are vendor-documented, not a reviewed independent SOC report. Certificate scopes are entity-specific and not a universal module/provider assurance.

- iso_27001 — ISO 27001 with scope and validity? [supported]: Inspected the 2026 ATTESTA Schweizer Zertifizierungsgesellschaft AG ISO27001:2022 certificate for Unique AG, registration 223-06-018.I. It covers software development/operation/trading/distribution and IT services, is issued 10 June 2026 after 4 June surveillance and expires 31 May 2029. The certificate-linked public register matches the number and expiry. The marketing-linked 2025 PDF is an older artifact, not the current renewal. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso27001, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso-register, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso-docs.
- soc2 — SOC 2 type, period and covered service? [partial]: The dedicated SOC page documents Type1 in December 2023 followed by Type2 in January 2025. This explains the historical Type1 references rather than proving an ongoing Type1-only state. Current Type2 status is a vendor claim; the auditor, actual report period and service/control scope were not inspected because the full report is NDA-gated. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-soc.
- c5 — BSI C5 attestation? [unknown]: No public BSI C5 attestation was retrieved from the certification pages/trust centre or targeted first-party search.
- other_certifications — Which other certificates (27701, 42001, TISAX)? [partial]: Inspected ATTESTA ISO9001:2015 renewal 223-06-017.Q for the same Unique AG software/IT scope, expiring 31 May 2029, matched in the public register. Separately inspected TÜV SÜD South Asia ISO42001:2023 certificate 99 420 00001, valid 7 March 2025 to 6 March 2028, for development/deployment of financial-services SaaS using foundation or client models. Current full ISAE/FINMA report scope was not inspected. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso9001, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso-register, unique-ai:unique-ai:iso42001.
- report_access — How can customers obtain reports? [supported]: The ISO documentation provides public certificate downloads. It says the ISO27001 Statement of Applicability requires a valid NDA. The dedicated SOC page likewise makes the audit report/certificate available on request after NDA. No NDA or sales request was made. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso-docs, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-soc.
- pentest — Are independent penetration test summaries available? [partial]: The public DPA describes internal/external security testing and the trust page describes tests/bug bounty. An independent penetration-test report, current scope or summary was not inspected. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-dpa, unique-ai:unique-ai:trust.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso27001, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso9001, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso-register, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso-docs, unique-ai:unique-ai:iso42001, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-soc, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-dpa, unique-ai:unique-ai:trust

### DATA-08: Encryption and key control

Judgment rule: Record encryption at rest and in transit, customer-managed keys (BYOK/HYOK), key location, and private networking (private link, IP allow-lists, VPN).

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Connections are encrypted over HTTPS, stored data is encrypted in the cloud, and each organisation's data is logically separated. Dedicated installations and on-premises: encryption and separation follow your infrastructure.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Deployment guides document encryption, isolated Single Tenant resources and optional IP filtering. Exact current MT PMK/CMK/HSM configuration and key sizes are not established across the conflicting pages.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique API and Python SDK; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; hosted MT/ST encryption and optional customer-controlled self-hosting availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Contracted Azure tenant/storage/backup region; actual key-vault/HSM location unverified; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No exact RSA/HSM key size or actual MT PMK/CMK design is asserted. A customer-specific deployment/key diagram and key-vault region were not inspected.
- Customer-generated imported keys held by Unique do not establish customer-exclusive key custody; full control is a separate self-hosting option.

- encryption_at_rest — Is data encrypted at rest? [partial]: The compliance matrix documents encryption at rest and in transit across deployment options, with AES256/TLS1.2+ in its controls text. No exact current RSA key size is asserted: the ST architecture says 2048-bit RSA-HSM while the hosted retention page says 4096-bit. An implementation-specific key design was not retrieved. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-compliance, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-single, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-retention.
- customer_managed_keys — Can the customer manage or hold the keys? [partial]: The infrastructure key guide allows a customer-generated key to be imported for a Unique-hosted Single Tenant, with Unique holding/managing it. It directs clients needing exclusive control of all storage keys to customer self-hosting. This is not HYOK or exclusive customer custody in Unique hosting. Actual MT PMK/CMK/HSM configuration is unknown because the key guide and hosted retention matrix disagree. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-keys, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-retention.
- private_networking — Is private connectivity or IP restriction available? [partial]: The Single-Tenant WAF supports optional IP blocking. The separate SEE consumer endpoint is public TLS with optional allow-list and no standard private endpoint/peering. These are distinct scopes; other private-link options for the customer deployment were not verified. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-single, unique-ai:unique-ai:security-export.
- tenant_isolation — How are customers separated in shared SaaS? [supported]: The Single-Tenant architecture describes a separate customer landing zone under Unique's subscription, isolating its storage/processing from other customers. This documents that ST architecture, not the isolation configuration of every hosted or customer-managed instance. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-single.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-compliance, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-single, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-retention, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-keys, unique-ai:unique-ai:security-export

### DATA-09: Professional secrecy

Judgment rule: For professional secrecy holders (Berufsgeheimnisträger: lawyers, doctors, auditors, tax advisers) under § 203 StGB (DE) and Art. 321 StGB (CH), record whether the vendor signs a contractual secrecy undertaking or a § 203 agreement that binds its staff and its sub-processors; whether this comes as a dedicated offering or a paid add-on, and on which plan; who can access content in plain text (vendor staff, sub-processors, model providers); and the documentation provided. A DPA or a no-training clause alone is not a secrecy undertaking. Banking secrecy and FINMA outsourcing belong to DATA-06, not here. Record contract facts, not a legal assessment.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Professional-secrecy agreement (for example § 203 StGB / Art. 321 StGB) on request.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Unique documents general staff/external-party access controls and customer-controlled on-premises access. A professional-secrecy undertaking under § 203 StGB or Art. 321 StGB, its subprocessor flow-down and qualifying plan/add-on remain unverified. Financial-sector banking-secrecy amendments are recorded separately under DATA-06.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique API and Python SDK; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI; profession-specific eligibility and fees unpublished; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Contracted hosting jurisdiction; customer-controlled on-premises access described separately from Unique-hosted access; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No executed professional-secrecy undertaking or § 203 / Art. 321 contract was inspected. General DPA confidentiality is not treated as such an undertaking.
- The M744 professional-secrecy wording appears in a banking-secrecy/financial-services framework; no inference is made to lawyers, doctors, auditors or tax advisers.
- Customer-controlled on-premises access does not establish the same access conditions for Unique-hosted deployments or all model-provider routes. Full plaintext-access mapping remains unknown.

- secrecy_undertaking — Does the vendor sign a secrecy undertaking or § 203 StGB / Art. 321 StGB agreement covering its own staff? [unknown]: No public Unique AI-specific § 203 StGB or Art. 321 StGB secrecy undertaking covering staff was located in the DPA, compliance documentation or targeted first-party search on 21 October 2026. The DPA confidentiality commitment alone does not establish a professional-secrecy undertaking. No executed or negotiated customer agreement was inspected.
- subprocessor_coverage — Does the undertaking extend to its sub-processors, and is that documented? [unknown]: The DPA says employees, contractual subprocessors and other service providers are bound to confidentiality of sensitive information. A professional-secrecy-specific obligation extending through the subprocessor/model-provider chain was not verified. The Microsoft M744 banking-secrecy amendment mentioned in the financial-services framework is not counted as evidence of § 203 / Art. 321 coverage for professional secrecy holders.
- secrecy_offering — Is it a dedicated offering or add-on, and on which plan? [unknown]: No qualifying professional-secrecy plan, dedicated offering, add-on tariff or named eligibility rule was located. The documented financial-services amendments and general deployment choices do not establish a separate § 203 / Art. 321 offering. Contract-specific terms and fees remain unknown.
- content_access — Who can access content in plain text: vendor staff, sub-processors, model providers? [partial]: DPA Appendix B permits employees or external parties access to personal/confidential information on a need-to-know basis. For on-premises support, customers control remote connections and Unique staff cannot access a customer system without customer knowledge or full active participation. The on-premises architecture also allows operation without any Unique access under customer control. These sources do not exhaustively identify plaintext access at each hosted subprocessor/model provider or profession-specific access conditions. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa, unique-ai:unique-ai:onpremsecurity.
- secrecy_documentation — Is the offering publicly documented (contract template, data-flow description, professional-body guidance)? [unknown]: A public DPA and on-premises architecture describe confidentiality and access controls, but no profession-specific secrecy template or professional-body guidance was located. The compliance page describes Microsoft M453/M744/M329 in a financial-services context; those banking/FINMA disclosures belong to DATA-06 and do not establish the missing professional-secrecy contract.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa, unique-ai:unique-ai:onpremsecurity, unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance

## Commercials and vendor

### VEN-01: Pricing model and list prices

Judgment rule: Record pricing unit (per seat, per active user, usage-based, platform fee, hybrid), list prices per plan in original currency with date, included usage and credits, add-on prices (connectors, agents, image generation) and overage rates. Cite public prices or dated quotes. Per-seat versus usage is a fact, not a quality judgment.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The page lists EUR 17/user/month with EUR 5 monthly model budget; Per seat overage is actual consumption with no minimum. Flat price and detailed tariffs remain quoted or unspecified.

Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-22): From €17 per user and month, including €5 of model use; lower for larger teams. Or one fixed price for the whole company.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat EUR 17/month; Flat price annual quote; publication is not GA verification; add_ons=EU-only processing option, price unknown; deployment_mode=not specified; region=European hosting; dedicated CH/DE/on-premises by quoted plan; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- add_ons: Per seat lists models, Image Studio, translator and Microsoft 365 access. Flat price additionally lists dedicated/on-premises hosting, own models, branding and onboarding. An EU-only processing tier is offered without a public surcharge or connector/agent add-on tariff.
- overage: For Per seat, usage beyond the included model budget is billed at actual consumption, with no minimum and invoices itemized by model and quantity; the usage journal shows provider-reported token counts. No complete tariff, model conversion/multiplier, top-up or rollover schedule was retrieved.

- pricing_unit — What is the pricing unit? [supported]: Per seat is priced per user/month. Flat price is one fixed annual company price with unlimited users; unlimited seats do not establish unlimited model usage. Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026.
- list_prices — What are list prices per plan, with date and currency? [supported]: As retrieved 2026-10-21, Per seat is EUR 17/user/month excluding VAT. The Flat price amount is on request; no CHF list price is shown. Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026.
- included_usage — What usage is included? [supported]: Per seat includes EUR 5 model budget per user/month. The page does not translate this into message/token/image quotas or state the Flat price usage allowance. Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026.
- add_ons — Which features cost extra? [partial]: Per seat lists models, Image Studio, translator and Microsoft 365 access. Flat price additionally lists dedicated/on-premises hosting, own models, branding and onboarding. An EU-only processing tier is offered without a public surcharge or connector/agent add-on tariff. Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026.
- overage — What do usage beyond limits and premium models cost? [partial]: For Per seat, usage beyond the included model budget is billed at actual consumption, with no minimum and invoices itemized by model and quantity; the usage journal shows provider-reported token counts. No complete tariff, model conversion/multiplier, top-up or rollover schedule was retrieved. Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Applicable current platform pricing unit, list tariff, included usage and overages remain unknown. A separately documented Single-Tenant SEE consumption/engineering charge is retained; legacy sales-conversation terms are excluded.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique API and Python SDK; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; platform subscription and separately enabled Single-Tenant SEE availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=SEE scope only where contracted; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Vendor currency and applicable invoicing terms not established for the platform; SEE guide separately quotes indicative CHF consumption; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- The SEE cost finding is scoped only to that Single-Tenant integration. It does not price the platform subscription or all modules.
- The 2023 sales-conversation ToS is excluded as evidence of current Unique AI commercial terms; no sales quote or private contract was requested.

- pricing_unit — What is the pricing unit? [unknown]: No applicable current platform MSA/order form or tariff establishing seat, active-user, platform or usage pricing units was retrieved. The public 18 October 2023 ToS defines a sales-conversation intelligence service, so its subscription/Order Form clauses are not applied to current Unique AI.
- list_prices — What are list prices per plan, with date and currency? [unknown]: No applicable current platform list tariff, tier names or primary invoicing currency was retrieved from platform/contract documentation or targeted first-party search.
- included_usage — What usage is included? [unknown]: No applicable current platform agreement specifying included model tokens, storage or module allowances was publicly retrieved.
- add_ons — Which features cost extra? [partial]: Single-Tenant SEE passes through Azure consumption without markup; guide observes CHF20-50/month/environment, not a fixed quote, with initial engineering at agreed rates. Other module charges are unpublished. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:security-export.
- overage — What do usage beyond limits and premium models cost? [unknown]: No applicable current platform overage or premium-model sales tariff was retrieved. Cost-management model estimates are not substituted for a customer sales tariff.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:security-export, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-governance, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-terms-admin

### VEN-02: Scenario cost

Judgment rule: Price three workloads for 12 months: 200, 1,000 and 5,000 users with a disclosed light/regular/power usage mix, in CHF and EUR excluding VAT. Include licences, platform fees, add-ons, model usage and, for self-hosted options, a stated operating assumption. Separate fixed, variable, included and unknown costs. No invented discounts.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Under ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21, only the published Per seat component is calculable. The scenario is from that EUR/CHF floor plus unknown usage/option charges; Flat price requires a quote.

Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-22): From €17 per user and month, including €5 of model use; lower for larger teams. Or one fixed price for the whole company.

Availability: beta
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat list-price scenario only; Flat price and customer-operated totals unknown; add_ons=No priced add-ons included; option costs unknown; deployment_mode=multi-tenant-saas; region=Published European-hosting offer; GA unverified; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21. Horizon 12 months, full paid seats, list price, excluding VAT, no invented discounts. These are plan components, not complete workload totals.
- The included model allowance is not counted twice. Annual model usage is 11.88M input and 2.376M output tokens per user under the disclosed mix, but the product billing tariff is unknown.

- cost_200 — Year-one cost at 200 users? [partial]: 200 seats for 12 months: from EUR 40,800 / CHF 37,686.96 excluding VAT, plus unknown usage/option costs. EUR 12,000 annual model budget is already included, not added again. Flat price and actual workload overage are unpriced. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:ecb-fx.
- cost_1000 — Year-one cost at 1,000 users? [partial]: 1,000 seats for 12 months: from EUR 204,000 / CHF 188,434.80 excluding VAT, plus unknown usage/option costs. EUR 60,000 annual model budget is already included. Flat price and actual workload overage are unpriced. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:ecb-fx.
- cost_5000 — Year-one cost at 5,000 users? [partial]: 5,000 seats for 12 months: from EUR 1,020,000 / CHF 942,174 excluding VAT, plus unknown usage/option costs. EUR 300,000 annual model budget is already included. Flat price and actual workload overage are unpriced. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:ecb-fx.
- variable_share — Which part depends on usage? [partial]: Shared workload: 60% light at 100, 30% regular at 400 and 10% power at 1,500 messages/user/month; each message has 3,000 input and 600 output tokens including retrieval. This is 330 messages/month/user. No onAI default-model tariff or credit-to-provider mapping is public, so no variable charge or variable percentage is invented. Sources: onai:public-pricing.
- unknown_parts — Which costs could not be priced? [partial]: Unknowns include Flat price quotes, model usage beyond the included allowance, premium features/EU-only options and customer-operated infrastructure/support. No proxy API price substitutes for an unpublished onAI tariff. FX is ECB 2026-10-20: EUR 1 = CHF 0.9237 and USD 1.1215; USD/EUR reciprocal 0.8916629514043692. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:public-processing, onai:ecb-fx.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:ecb-fx, onai:public-pricing, onai:public-processing, onai:review-plan-m365, onai:review-residency-parts

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21. Public enterprise pricing is insufficient for the required 200/1,000/5,000-user annual totals.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21. Horizon 12 months, list prices excluding VAT, no invented discounts. Mix 60% light at 100 messages/user/month, 30% regular at 400, 10% power at 1,500. Where model usage is separately billed, each message has 3,000 input and 600 output tokens, giving 990k input plus 198k output per user/month. At 200/1,000/5,000 users this is 198m/990m/4.95bn input and 39.6m/198m/990m output per month. All three seat counts require an unpublished enterprise/custom price; no quote was requested. CHF and EUR ex-VAT totals, fixed charges, variable charges and add-ons remain unknown. FX dated 2026-10-20: EUR 1 = CHF 0.9237 and USD 1.1215; CHF to EUR divide by 0.9237, USD to EUR divide by 1.1215, source ECB. No numeric conversion or proxy model tariff is applied because there is no applicable public enterprise base/usage rate.

- cost_200 — Year-one cost at 200 users? [unknown]: ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21. Horizon 12 months, list prices excluding VAT, no invented discounts. Mix 60% light at 100 messages/user/month, 30% regular at 400, 10% power at 1,500. Where model usage is separately billed, each message has 3,000 input and 600 output tokens, giving 990k input plus 198k output per user/month. At 200/1,000/5,000 users this is 198m/990m/4.95bn input and 39.6m/198m/990m output per month. All three seat counts require an unpublished enterprise/custom price; no quote was requested. CHF and EUR ex-VAT totals, fixed charges, variable charges and add-ons remain unknown. FX dated 2026-10-20: EUR 1 = CHF 0.9237 and USD 1.1215; CHF to EUR divide by 0.9237, USD to EUR divide by 1.1215, source ECB. No numeric conversion or proxy model tariff is applied because there is no applicable public enterprise base/usage rate.
- cost_1000 — Year-one cost at 1,000 users? [unknown]: ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21. Horizon 12 months, list prices excluding VAT, no invented discounts. Mix 60% light at 100 messages/user/month, 30% regular at 400, 10% power at 1,500. Where model usage is separately billed, each message has 3,000 input and 600 output tokens, giving 990k input plus 198k output per user/month. At 200/1,000/5,000 users this is 198m/990m/4.95bn input and 39.6m/198m/990m output per month. All three seat counts require an unpublished enterprise/custom price; no quote was requested. CHF and EUR ex-VAT totals, fixed charges, variable charges and add-ons remain unknown. FX dated 2026-10-20: EUR 1 = CHF 0.9237 and USD 1.1215; CHF to EUR divide by 0.9237, USD to EUR divide by 1.1215, source ECB. No numeric conversion or proxy model tariff is applied because there is no applicable public enterprise base/usage rate.
- cost_5000 — Year-one cost at 5,000 users? [unknown]: ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21. Horizon 12 months, list prices excluding VAT, no invented discounts. Mix 60% light at 100 messages/user/month, 30% regular at 400, 10% power at 1,500. Where model usage is separately billed, each message has 3,000 input and 600 output tokens, giving 990k input plus 198k output per user/month. At 200/1,000/5,000 users this is 198m/990m/4.95bn input and 39.6m/198m/990m output per month. All three seat counts require an unpublished enterprise/custom price; no quote was requested. CHF and EUR ex-VAT totals, fixed charges, variable charges and add-ons remain unknown. FX dated 2026-10-20: EUR 1 = CHF 0.9237 and USD 1.1215; CHF to EUR divide by 0.9237, USD to EUR divide by 1.1215, source ECB. No numeric conversion or proxy model tariff is applied because there is no applicable public enterprise base/usage rate.
- variable_share — Which part depends on usage? [unknown]: ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21. Horizon 12 months, list prices excluding VAT, no invented discounts. Mix 60% light at 100 messages/user/month, 30% regular at 400, 10% power at 1,500. Where model usage is separately billed, each message has 3,000 input and 600 output tokens, giving 990k input plus 198k output per user/month. At 200/1,000/5,000 users this is 198m/990m/4.95bn input and 39.6m/198m/990m output per month. All three seat counts require an unpublished enterprise/custom price; no quote was requested. CHF and EUR ex-VAT totals, fixed charges, variable charges and add-ons remain unknown. FX dated 2026-10-20: EUR 1 = CHF 0.9237 and USD 1.1215; CHF to EUR divide by 0.9237, USD to EUR divide by 1.1215, source ECB. No numeric conversion or proxy model tariff is applied because there is no applicable public enterprise base/usage rate.
- unknown_parts — Which costs could not be priced? [supported]: Subscription/order pricing, usage billing, provider contracts, deployment operation, connectors, execution, training and support charges are not publicly priced. SEE consumption example alone cannot price the platform. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:terms, unique-ai:unique-ai:platform, unique-ai:unique-ai:security-export.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:terms, unique-ai:unique-ai:platform, unique-ai:unique-ai:security-export, unique-ai:unique-ai:ecb-fx

### VEN-03: Evaluation access

Judgment rule: Distinguish free tier, self-serve trial, sales-led pilot, paid proof of concept and open-source self-install. Record card requirement, duration, seat limit, and which features (SSO, connectors, admin) the trial includes. Map which shared scenarios can be run without sales approval.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source.

A personal demo, then trial access for your team.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The public route is demo/evaluation by arrangement; self-service trial conditions were not established.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No permanent business free tier or self-serve trial with duration/card/seat/SSO/connector/admin entitlements was located. No sales contact, login or fixture account was used.

- free_tier — Is there a free tier for business use? [unknown]: Is there a free tier for business use? Unknown. No permanent business free tier or self-serve trial with duration/card/seat/SSO/connector/admin entitlements was located. No sales contact, login or fixture account was used.
- self_serve_trial — Is a self-serve business trial available? [unknown]: Is a self-serve business trial available? Unknown. No permanent business free tier or self-serve trial with duration/card/seat/SSO/connector/admin entitlements was located. No sales contact, login or fixture account was used.
- trial_scope — Do trials include SSO, connectors and admin features? [unknown]: Do trials include SSO, connectors and admin features? Unknown. No permanent business free tier or self-serve trial with duration/card/seat/SSO/connector/admin entitlements was located. No sales contact, login or fixture account was used.
- sales_gate — Does meaningful evaluation require sales contact? [partial]: Current platform CTA requests a demo; public baseline ToS says Unique may offer evaluation at its discretion. This does not prove every meaningful evaluation is sales-gated. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:platform, unique-ai:unique-ai:terms.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:platform, unique-ai:unique-ai:terms

### VEN-04: Contract terms and pricing transparency

Judgment rule: Record minimum seats or commitment, contract length, monthly versus annual billing, price-change rules, cancellation and downgrade terms, and invoicing in CHF/EUR. Classify pricing as transparent, partially specified, quote-only or unknown, naming the missing fields. Quote-only pricing is a disclosed constraint.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Per seat has a public EUR headline and monthly seat flexibility; Flat price is quoted annually. Legal commitment, cancellation rules and CHF invoicing remain unverified.

Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-22): From €17 per user and month, including €5 of model use; lower for larger teams. Or one fixed price for the whole company.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat monthly price/seat flexibility; Flat price annual quote; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Swiss provider; EUR display; CHF invoicing unknown; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Published billing frequency is not an executed minimum-term contract. No undisclosed enterprise discount is assumed.

- minimum_commitment — What seat or spend minimum applies? [unknown]: No minimum seat count or spend commitment is stated on the current pricing page. The about-50-user flat-price break-even is not a contractual minimum. Sources: onai:public-pricing.
- contract_length — What contract lengths are offered? [partial]: Per seat is quoted monthly and says seats can be added/removed each month. Flat price is quoted annually; the legal contract length and billing options are not supplied. Sources: onai:public-pricing.
- cancellation — How can the contract be cancelled or reduced? [partial]: The page promises monthly Per seat seat changes. Cancellation notice, proration, refunds, price-change rules and downgrade terms were not obtained. Sources: onai:public-pricing.
- local_invoicing — Can it be invoiced in CHF or EUR from a European entity? [partial]: Prices are displayed in EUR and the identified provider is Swiss Telesoft AG. Actual invoice currency, CHF availability and VAT/payment terms were not verified. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:public-imprint.
- transparency_class — Is pricing transparent, partial, quote-only or unknown? [supported]: Partially specified: the Per seat headline and allowance are public; Flat price is quote-only and usage overage, option prices and legal terms are missing. Sources: onai:public-pricing.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-imprint, onai:public-pricing

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Current platform minimums, term, cancellation and local invoicing remain unknown because the applicable agreement was not publicly retrieved. Current documentation makes legal contracts available on request; legacy sales-conversation renewal clauses are excluded.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration, Unique API and Python SDK; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform; platform commercial agreement; actual agreement not inspected availability and deployment/provider configuration depend on the customer agreement; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CHF/EUR invoicing and legal entity for a specific platform contract unverified; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- No current customer agreement or sales quote was requested. Contract availability on request does not establish price, term or cancellation conditions.

- minimum_commitment — What seat or spend minimum applies? [unknown]: No current platform seat/spend minimum was established from the public contract-access and platform pages.
- contract_length — What contract lengths are offered? [unknown]: No applicable current Unique AI agreement establishing subscription duration, renewal term or notice period was retrieved. The 2023 sales-conversation service term is not applied.
- cancellation — How can the contract be cancelled or reduced? [unknown]: Current Unique AI cancellation, refund, seat-reduction and nonrenewal rules were not retrieved. The 30-day renewal notice and quantity restrictions from the sales-conversation ToS are excluded.
- local_invoicing — Can it be invoiced in CHF or EUR from a European entity? [unknown]: CHF/EUR invoice currency, billing entity and local invoicing eligibility for a current platform contract were not established.
- transparency_class — Is pricing transparent, partial, quote-only or unknown? [partial]: The current governance framework says legal contracts and end-user T&Cs are available on request. No applicable public platform list tariff or complete commercial agreement was retrieved. This records an access/transparency gap, not a price or a customer-specific commitment. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-governance, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-terms-admin.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-governance, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-terms-admin

### VEN-05: Source licence

Judgment rule: Record licence per component (client, server, connectors, hosted extensions) and revision. Distinguish OSI open source, source-available with restrictions (branding clauses, user caps), and closed. Repository visibility is not a licence classification. Licences change between releases: record the current terms, and never carry a fork's historical licence over to the upstream product or the reverse.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Proprietary software from onAI; the source code is not public. Included open-source components are under their own licences.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The public reference repository uses restricted Unique License v1, while the Python SDK has an explicit MIT exception. Hosted platform component terms and enterprise-edition boundaries remain unverified.

Availability: source-only
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique API and Python SDK, Unique AI Chat and administration; version=Unique-AG/ai commit afa596c9b4b0231895ff70f44029a9a525f746e9; plan=Public reference-code and Python SDK licences; current contracted Unique AI client/server/connector agreement remains unavailable; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Public Unique License v1 specifies Swiss law and Zurich venue; this is not a hosted-service residency claim; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- The MIT exception applies to unique_sdk, not every directory or the hosted platform.
- Root reference-code terms are not substituted for customer platform branding, seat or enterprise-edition conditions.
- The 2023 sales-conversation service ToS remains excluded.

- licence_type — Which licence applies to each component? [partial]: The public Unique-AG/ai repository at afa596c9b4b0231895ff70f44029a9a525f746e9 defaults to Unique License v1, which restricts commercial use, distribution and modification without written approval. The unique_sdk directory is an explicit MIT exception, confirmed by LICENSE and package metadata. This is a component-level source-available/MIT distinction; current hosted client/server/connector customer terms and a full dependency inventory remain unknown. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:reference-licence-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:unique-licence-v1-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk-licence-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk-package-20261026.
- branding_restrictions — Do licence terms restrict branding or user counts? [partial]: Unique License v1 requires written approval to modify or redistribute covered reference code; the MIT SDK exception requires retention of copyright/licence notices. A current hosted-platform white-label/logo-removal obligation or a numerical user cap is not established by these public component licences. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:reference-licence-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:unique-licence-v1-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk-licence-20261026.
- enterprise_features_closed — Are enterprise features in a separate closed edition? [unknown]: Current closed/open enterprise-edition boundaries were not established from an applicable component licence inventory. Public SDK/repository availability is not proof of the whole platform licence. Rechecked 2026-10-26 in Unique AI governance framework: contract access, Terms and Conditions Administration. No current customer MSA, quote, private schedule or gated contract was requested. The differently scoped 2023 sales-conversation ToS remains excluded.

Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-25.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-governance, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-terms-admin, unique-ai:unique-ai:reference-licence-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:unique-licence-v1-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk-licence-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk-package-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-governance-20261026, unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-terms-admin-20261026

### VEN-06: Data export and exit

Judgment rule: Record admin export of chats, assistants, knowledge bases, prompts and audit logs, formats, export completeness, user self-export, and what survives contract end. Run an admin export on a trial. Exported chats alone do not make assistants and knowledge portable.

#### onAI

Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor)
Support: stated
Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source.

Users export their chats as JSON; an export for the whole organisation on request.

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Authorised content/report export exists, but full assistant/knowledge portability is unverified.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Reusable assistant/prompt and full knowledge/source exports, complete machine-readable state and current AI termination window remain unverified. No admin export fixture was run.

- chat_export — Can admins export all chats? [partial]: Detailed interaction export includes user prompts/answers over a chosen period with privacy settings. Completeness across files, agent state and all historical chats was not tested. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:analytics.
- assistant_export — Can assistants and prompts be exported in a reusable format? [unknown]: Can assistants and prompts be exported in a reusable format? Unknown. Reusable assistant/prompt and full knowledge/source exports, complete machine-readable state and current AI termination window remain unverified. No admin export fixture was run.
- knowledge_export — Can knowledge bases and their sources be exported? [unknown]: Can knowledge bases and their sources be exported? Unknown. Reusable assistant/prompt and full knowledge/source exports, complete machine-readable state and current AI termination window remain unverified. No admin export fixture was run.
- export_format — Are formats documented and machine-readable? [partial]: Model usage CSV and detailed analytics exports are documented. DPA promises return in existing format, not a universal reusable assistant/knowledge format. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:cost, unique-ai:unique-ai:analytics, unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa.
- post_termination_window — How long can data be retrieved after termination? [partial]: Baseline ToS 11.4 offers recorded-call download/export on written request within 30 days; that does not establish a chat/assistant/KB exit window. DPA return is within reasonable time. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:terms, unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:analytics, unique-ai:unique-ai:cost, unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa, unique-ai:unique-ai:terms

### VEN-07: Support and service levels

Judgment rule: Record support channels, languages (German, French, Italian), hours and time zone, local or regional presence, documented response times, uptime SLA and credits, public status page and incident history. Popularity is not a reliability score.

#### onAI

Verification status: Sourced (sourced)
Support: partial

The Swiss provider identity, general company contact and Website-only public status history are established. Support channels, languages/hours, response targets and uptime credits for Per seat and Flat price remain unknown.

Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-23): A direct line to the team, no call centre, in German and English. Onboarding and training are included in the fixed price. We build custom agents and workflows as a service. Service levels and response times are agreed in the contract.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public provider website and status sources retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Company identity/contact and Website-only status facts; Per seat/Flat price support entitlement unverified.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Swiss legal entity; support staffing/access countries unknown; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Remains public-candidate: entity identity and website-status facts are separated from unverified product-plan support commitments.
- The Website-only service history and generic custom-development SLA wording do not establish a workspace uptime target or credit schedule.

- support_channels — Which support channels are available on each plan? [unknown]: The company publishes info@onaihq.com and a general inquiry/demo form. No public evidence maps these to a contracted support desk for Per seat or Flat price, or states hours, escalation and response commitments. Sources: onai:public-imprint, onai:public-services.
- support_languages — Is support available in German, French or Italian? [unknown]: English/German website and UI copy do not establish contractual DE/FR/IT support languages or support hours.
- regional_presence — Is there a DACH or Swiss entity, team or partner? [supported]: The imprint identifies Telesoft AG in Oberwil-Lieli, Switzerland, with a Swiss VAT registration. No reseller roster is inferred. Sources: onai:public-imprint.
- uptime_sla — Is there an uptime SLA with credits? [unknown]: Custom development copy mentions SLAs but supplies no product uptime target, measurement, exclusions or credit schedule. A status percentage is not a contractual SLA. Sources: onai:public-services.
- status_page — Is there a public status page with history? [partial]: The first-party-linked status page has notice history for Website only. This is a marketing-website status fact, not a Per seat/Flat price workspace/API status promise or support entitlement. Sources: onai:review-status-service-scope.

Checked 2026-10-21; not separately cross-checked; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-imprint, onai:public-services, onai:review-status-service-scope

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

Enterprise support and a public multitenant status page are available; response times are contracted.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Guaranteed DE/FR/IT support, numeric hours/response times, dedicated uptime/credits and complete incident-history export were not established.

- support_channels — Which support channels are available on each plan? [supported]: Enterprise email and three-layer dedicated support escalation through customer team, CS and engineering. Hours/responses depend on SLA; extended-hours contract is extra. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:support.
- support_languages — Is support available in German, French or Italian? [unknown]: Is support available in German, French or Italian? Unknown. Guaranteed DE/FR/IT support, numeric hours/response times, dedicated uptime/credits and complete incident-history export were not established.
- regional_presence — Is there a DACH or Swiss entity, team or partner? [supported]: Unique AI AG lists Zürich, Unique Germany GmbH Berlin, plus UK/US/Singapore entities. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:contact.
- uptime_sla — Is there an uptime SLA with credits? [partial]: Support docs defer hours and response times to SLA contract; no public uptime/credit schedule was obtained. Baseline terms only promise commercially reasonable availability efforts. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:support, unique-ai:unique-ai:terms.
- status_page — Is there a public status page with history? [supported]: status.prod.unique.app publicly shows component/uptime history. Support docs scope it to multitenant accounts, not every dedicated environment. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:support, unique-ai:unique-ai:status.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:support, unique-ai:unique-ai:contact, unique-ai:unique-ai:terms, unique-ai:unique-ai:status

### VEN-08: Onboarding, training and adoption

Judgment rule: Record vendor-led onboarding, admin training, end-user training (live, e-learning, languages), use-case libraries, champion programmes, change-management materials and their cost. Distinguish included services from paid professional services and partner offerings.

#### onAI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The vendor offers training, workshops and custom agent services. Flat price lists onboarding/training/workshops; languages, delivery scope and separate service costs remain unknown.

Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-23): A direct line to the team, no call centre, in German and English. Onboarding and training are included in the fixed price. We build custom agents and workflows as a service. Service levels and response times are agreed in the contract.

Availability: unknown
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Flat price named services included; Per seat/service contract unspecified; add_ons=Bespoke agent/workflow development, quoted scope; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Delivery geography and languages unspecified; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Vendor/partner professional services are distinguished from native product workflow automation. No service outcome or price is invented.

- onboarding_service — Is guided onboarding included? [supported]: The public Flat price offer includes onboarding, training and workshops. Per seat inclusion and precise deliverables are not specified. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:public-services.
- user_training — Is end-user training offered, in which languages? [partial]: The vendor offers practical prompt/tool/best-practice sessions tailored to Marketing, HR and IT. Session format, DE/FR/IT languages, hours and e-learning availability were not retrieved. Sources: onai:public-services.
- use_case_library — Are role-based use cases and templates provided? [unknown]: The site describes use-case workshops and public guides, but no role-based in-product use-case/template library inventory or licence was obtained.
- adoption_programme — Is there a champion or adoption programme? [unknown]: No scoped champion programme, change-management package or measured adoption service deliverable was retrieved; generic skills guides do not establish one.
- service_cost — Which services cost extra? [unknown]: Flat price includes named services but its amount is quoted; separate Per seat onboarding, training, workshops and custom-development fees are not published. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:public-services.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:public-services

#### Unique AI

Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked)
Support: partial

The vendor markets forward-deployed delivery and structured training; inclusion and cost remain unpriced.

Availability: generally-available
Delivery: native
Scope: surfaces=Unique AI Chat and administration; version=not specified; plan=Contracted Unique AI platform and enabled modules. No public named tariff tiers were established; deployment and provider entitlements vary by MSA.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=CH/EU/US/UK/APAC per deployment; inference and external tools require separate region configuration; os=not specified.

Limitations:
- Champion/adoption programme structure, training languages, included versus professional-service fees and onboarding hours are not published.

- onboarding_service — Is guided onboarding included? [partial]: Homepage markets embedded forward-deployed experts helping business/IT ship use cases; exact licence-included rollout scope is contracted. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:homepage.
- user_training — Is end-user training offered, in which languages? [partial]: Vendor homepage describes structured programmes teaching users to use/build/scale; current languages and course entitlement are not specified. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:homepage.
- use_case_library — Are role-based use cases and templates provided? [supported]: Public documentation has finance-role workflows, Chat/Conduct guidance, configurable Suggested Prompts and agent examples. Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:platform, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct.
- adoption_programme — Is there a champion or adoption programme? [unknown]: Is there a champion or adoption programme? Unknown. Champion/adoption programme structure, training languages, included versus professional-service fees and onboarding hours are not published.
- service_cost — Which services cost extra? [unknown]: Which services cost extra? Unknown. Champion/adoption programme structure, training languages, included versus professional-service fees and onboarding hours are not published.

Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20.

Sources: unique-ai:unique-ai:platform, unique-ai:unique-ai:homepage, unique-ai:unique-ai:agent, unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct

## Sources

### onai:public-models-display-20261026

onAI public product and pricing page. The page names Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok and Mistral, user model selection and administrator allow-lists, without exact chat model IDs.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: Ready for the whole company from day one > Every leading model; AI Gateway; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:models

Unique LLM availability overview. Lists contract-dependent provider/model availability, region SKUs, dated additions and retirements; CH Phoeniqs remains QA-only.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/models-llm-management/how-we-evaluate-models/llm-availability-overview
- Locator: Per-client availability; Azure/LiteLLM/Phoeniqs matrices; Recent changes
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-10-12
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:agent

Unique AI space configuration. Documents admin instructions, configured model/tools, knowledge binding, prompts and people/group Can chat/Can manage access.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/space-management/create-spaces/unique-ai-space
- Locator: Models; sources/tools; sharing; publishing
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-06-18
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:conduct

Unique AI Conduct. Documents autonomous Python/Bash work, visible steps, approvals and stop, with per-chat files and restricted egress.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/users/spaces/unique-ai-conduct
- Locator: GA release 2026.40; execution UI; limitations
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-09-30
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:release42

Unique release 2026.42. Hosted release 14 October 2026 makes chat sharing and Context Memory GA, labels Scheduled Tasks experimental, changes protected-file ingestion and documents current model additions/migrations.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/installing-and-upgrading-unique/release-notes-and-calendar/release-notes-2026/release-2026-42
- Locator: Release Overview; Chat Platform; RAG; Unique AI; Language Model
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-10-14
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:customllm

Custom LXM connection. Documents operator-created external model endpoints, API/OAuth credentials and model groups.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/custom-models-and-embeddings/connect-custom-lxm-llm-with-unique-ai
- Locator: Technical insight; Create and Connect; Security
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:code

Code Execution. Documents Azure Responses API Python execution, downloadable outputs, no outbound internet and model/file restrictions.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/space-management/tools/code-execution
- Locator: Compatibility; output; limitations; governance
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-07-30
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:compliance

Compliance Layer 3.0. Describes FINMA/bank-secrecy/CH-DPA Microsoft amendments and deployment-specific assurance limitations.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/security-and-compliance/compliance/compliance-layer-3-0
- Locator: Legal framework; FSI amendments; deployment feature matrix
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-27
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:embeddings

Custom embedding models. Documents custom embedding endpoints, one model per organisation and mandatory re-embedding after model/dimension changes.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/custom-models-and-embeddings/usage-or-change-of-custom-embedding-model
- Locator: Setup; configuration; re-embedding
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:onpremsecurity

On-premises security architecture. Documents full customer control and possible operation without Unique access, with customer models/infrastructure.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/installing-and-upgrading-unique/install-unique/on-premise-tenant/security-architecture-on-premises
- Locator: Overview; custom setup
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-08
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:operators

IT operator documentation overview. Describes dedicated Unique-managed, customer-cloud and full air-gapped on-premise modes.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators
- Locator: Supported deployment models
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-code

Code Execution. The page allows selected Knowledge Base files to be preloaded with additionalUploadedDocuments. Its compatibility list includes Azure and LiteLLM OpenAI Responses-capable IDs despite Azure-only introduction/limitations. Azure sandbox controls are not proof of the LiteLLM execution region.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/space-management/tools/code-execution
- Locator: Functionality; Limitations; All available models; Security & Governance; additionalUploadedDocuments
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-07-30
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-models

Unique LLM availability overview. The model catalogue separates provider routes, region/SKU choices and QA-only Swiss Phoeniqs. It is a technical availability inventory, not a complete legal subprocessor schedule.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/models-llm-management/how-we-evaluate-models/llm-availability-overview
- Locator: Provider and region matrices; Phoeniqs Model Service; recent changes
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-10-12
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:cost

Model usage and cost management. Documents off-by-default estimated usage dashboards and enforced daily company/group/user model-call limits.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/models-llm-management/model-usage-and-cost-management
- Locator: Beta flags; daily limits; cost calculation; CSV
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-07-21
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:files

Upload and Chat limits. Specifies 512 MB/file, 30 files/batch, default forced retrieval for selected uploads and configurable expiry.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/users/upload-chat-file-limits-how-large-documents-are-handled
- Locator: Production limits; retrieval; expiry
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-06-28
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:filetypes

Supported file types. Lists common Office/PDF/text formats and general ingestion limitations that differ from the newer chat-specific limits.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/users/supported-file-types
- Locator: Types; exceptions; ingestion quality
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-09
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:file-ingestion-20261026

Unique file ingestion administration. Base ingestion lacks scanned-PDF OCR. MDI supports image-based PDFs; Docling has partial support. MDI must be provisioned and enabled per folder or chat Space, and the guide distinguishes experimental image-content extraction and deprecated agentic ingestion.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/knowledge-base-for-admins/file-ingestion
- Locator: Ingestion overview capability table; Enable MDI; Enable MDI for Upload in Chat
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:kbpermissions

Knowledge scope permissions. Describes query filtering by user/group scopes, but older SharePoint permission statements differ from the newer connector guide.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/knowledge-base-for-admins/folder-scope-access-permissions
- Locator: Scopes; source integration limits
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:public-m365-display-20261026

onAI public product and pricing page. The page lists live Microsoft 365 sources, optional channel/transcript permissions and optional Copilot-licensed search and meeting notes.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: Answers from your Microsoft 365, live > Where onAI looks; Your admin can add; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026

onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor describes delegated read-only requests under each user, no copied library index, source citations, admin model restrictions and Microsoft administrator consent.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: Your Microsoft permissions stay in charge; For IT; Every permission onAI can request; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### onai:public-other-connectors-display-20261026

onAI public product and pricing page. The FAQ describes Microsoft 365 live retrieval and names Confluence, S3 and custom sources through standard connectors or an API; it gives no connector-by-connector setup or plan catalogue.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: FAQ > How is our data integrated into the system?; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:sharepoint

SharePoint connector. Documents periodic indexed sync, optional content-and-permissions mode, site selection and absent label-level detection.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/integrations-connectors/sharepoint-connector
- Locator: Modes; permission sync; limitations
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-07-06
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:confluence

Confluence connector. Documents Cloud/Data Center content sync without source-permission synchronisation.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/integrations-connectors/confluence-connector
- Locator: Requirements; sync; limitations
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-06-28
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:platform-overview-20261026

Unique platform overview. The platform architecture names Google Drive and Salesforce among knowledge sources, alongside SharePoint/OneDrive, Confluence and Teams/Outlook. It does not provide per-connector consent, rollout or price entitlements.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/platform-overview
- Locator: Connectors and Knowledge Sources diagram
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:release40-20261026

Unique release 2026.40. GA HTML dashboards can list, enable and sign in to MCP connectors, with Salesforce and Yahoo Finance named examples. Contract/module enablement and personal connection state still apply.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/installing-and-upgrading-unique/release-notes-and-calendar/release-notes-2026/release-2026-40
- Locator: Hosted September 30 2026; Chat Experience, GA HTML connector dashboards
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-09-30
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026

onAI live Microsoft 365 retrieval and citation description. The vendor describes delegated Microsoft permission checks, live reads without a second library index, retrieved material retained in the asking user’s chat and numbered source links.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/#microsoft365
- Locator: Your Microsoft permissions stay in charge; Nothing copied, nothing indexed; Sources on every answer; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, HTTP 200 body SHA256 a074779dc4d08c5e48440218bbc01353565673585b9e0f7eab517ed9687b77fa
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### onai:review-plan-m365-display-20261026

onAI live pricing: named Microsoft 365 plan scope. The Per seat card expressly includes Microsoft 365 answers and the Flat price card includes everything in Per seat; the cards do not establish separate DPA, provider-retention or support entitlements.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/#pricing
- Locator: Per seat > Answers from Microsoft 365, with each user’s own permissions; Flat price > Everything in Per seat, for every employee; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, HTTP 200 body SHA256 a074779dc4d08c5e48440218bbc01353565673585b9e0f7eab517ed9687b77fa
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:permissioncache

Permission cache timing. Describes usual subsecond internal permission propagation without a hard upper bound, and stale rules after a missed broadcast.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/access-management-for-admins/cache-permission-sla
- Locator: Expected timing; degraded scenarios
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-09-22
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:keys

Single-tenant key management. Explains why client-held keys are unavailable across all Single Tenant data stores and directs full key control to self-hosting.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/installing-and-upgrading-unique/install-unique/single-tenant/security-architecture-single-tenant/key-management
- Locator: Big picture; BYOK/CYOK/HYOK; storage locations
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-27
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:retention

Retention and deletion at Unique. Documents no training, Azure abuse-monitoring opt-out, post-termination retention and backup exceptions.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/security-and-compliance/data-protection/data-retention-and-data-deletion-at-unique
- Locator: Hosted-only scope; Azure provider retention; deletion; encryption
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-04
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:memory

Context Memory in Unique AI Chat. Documents private per-user cross-chat memory, edit/disable controls and an explicit warning that disabling does not delete the stored profile.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/users/spaces/unique-ai-chat/context-memory-in-unique-ai-chat
- Locator: Private profile; edit and disable; web-search restriction
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-09-15
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:chat

Unique AI Chat. Describes the user chat workspace and configurable tools.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/users/spaces/unique-ai-chat
- Locator: Features and access
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-09-03
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:roles

Access role concept. Defines identity, application, space and knowledge-scope permissions, including delegated management roles.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/identity-and-access-management-iam/access-role-concept
- Locator: Four access layers
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:mcp

MCP tools for spaces. Describes feature-flagged beta MCP clients with organisation and per-space connector/tool controls.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/space-management/tools/mcp-tools
- Locator: Beta warning; flags; selective tool enablement
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-21
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:hub

MCP Hub security governance. Documents per-user token routing, approved origin restrictions and tool-call correlation; some DLP/elicitation pipeline measures are planned.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/mcp/the-mcp-hub/govern/security-governance
- Locator: Authentication; governance; planned request pipeline
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-08-26
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:deepresearch

Deep Research tool. Documents experimental research/report engine, with separate external OpenAI-engine data flows and limited current tools.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/space-management/tools/deep-research
- Locator: Experimental warning; engines; user flow
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-09
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:websearch

Web Search tool. Documents multiple search engines, source citations and experimental query review/screening; conversation context may leave through queries.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/space-management/tools/web-search
- Locator: Modes; engines; external-query warning
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-20
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:onai:review-fix-public-workflow-scope-20261026

onAI public workflow and service offer. The undated public homepage labels the native workflow engine coming soon and describes n8n integration operated by onAI, the customer or a partner, with workflow construction offered on request. It gives no native release date or plan-specific workflow entitlement.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: Automation platform; Coming soon; n8n service/operator sentence; direct public GET HTTP200 2026-10-26, body SHA256 1ea21a62b3a2bb75b66287a93fd86a47984d51519e7fd99f4ca53930996219bc
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk

Python SDK documentation. Documents SDK/public API access and customer-operated modules with event-driven webhook integration.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/developers/software-development-kit-sdk
- Locator: Public API; webhook verification; personal/app keys
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-08
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:scheduled

Scheduled Tasks. Documents off-by-default recurring tasks running with user permissions; unattended approvals/questions can stop a run.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/users/scheduled-tasks
- Locator: Beta warning; task settings; runs and limits
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-10-12
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-scheduled

Scheduled Tasks. Scheduled Chat/Conduct tasks offer Automatic or Manual approval. The newer release labels scheduling Experimental and feature-flagged; unattended automatic approval is not mandatory human confirmation.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/users/scheduled-tasks
- Locator: At a glance; task Approval setting; unattended runs
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-10-12
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-release42

Unique release 2026.42. Release 2026.42 makes Shared Chats GA, on by default per company with a per-Space toggle and preservation of explicit settings. Scheduled Tasks remain Experimental and feature-flagged.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/installing-and-upgrading-unique/release-notes-and-calendar/release-notes-2026/release-2026-42
- Locator: Highlights; Chat Platform; Conduct scheduling flag
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-10-14
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:mcpkb

Knowledge Base MCP user guide. Documents external-assistant search/read with user permissions, citations and optional KB scope restrictions.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/integrations-connectors/knowledge-base-mcp/knowledge-base-mcp-user-guide
- Locator: Connecting; access; limitations
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-10-05
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:api-usage

API model usage tracking. Documents public API/SDK model-call usage tracking; some other internal-service calls are outside scope and REST usage retrieval is planned.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/operations/api-model-usage-tracking
- Locator: Coverage; flags; limitations
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:public-web-client

onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor describes an employee workspace in a current browser with nothing to install; native client availability is unspecified.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: The platform > AI Tools; FAQ > What prerequisites do we need to meet?
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:translation

Translator space. Documents beta Office-file/text translation with glossary pre/postprocessing and potential layout disruption.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/space-management/create-spaces/translator-space
- Locator: Beta; glossary; document types; limitations
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-06
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:public-images

onAI public product and pricing page. Image Studio advertises GPT Image, Nano Banana Pro, Imagen 4 and FLUX.3, up to three models per prompt, upload editing, per-image estimated costs and administrator controls.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: Every leading image model in one studio; Compare side by side; Edit in plain words; Run by your admins
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:public-image-rights

onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor says generated images may be used commercially; provider-specific output terms are not supplied.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: Every leading image model in one studio > commercial use
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:voice

Voice administration. Requires Azure AI Speech Services and describes potential public/backbone audio routing.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/space-management/voice-administration
- Locator: Dependencies; networking; limitations
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:dpa

Unique data processing addendum. Public DPA covers hosted chat/recordings, lists Microsoft, Swiss storage, return/deletion, confidentiality and ten-year audit-log retention.

- URL: https://www.unique.ai/data-processing-addendum
- Locator: Sections 2-3, 6-7; Appendices A-B; July 2025 footer
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:voice-user

Using Voice. Documents prompt dictation with EN/DE/FR/IT, immediate audio discard and dialect/recognition limitations.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/users/spaces/using-voice
- Locator: Prompt dictation; privacy note; supported languages
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:public-pricing-display-20261026

onAI public product and pricing page. Published EUR pricing is 17 per user/month with 5 of monthly model budget; a flat annual price is on request, with unlimited users and dedicated/on-premises options.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: Pay per seat, or one price for everyone > Per seat; Flat price; prices excluding VAT; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:sso

Single sign-on setup. Documents Zitadel SSO across deployment types, group claims and automatic SAML account creation/update.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/identity-and-access-management-iam/how-to-setup-single-sign-on-sso
- Locator: Entra ID OIDC; SAML; managed-tenant setup
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:scim

SCIM provisioning. Documents Unique SCIM endpoint/key for IdP user/group synchronisation.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/identity-and-access-management-iam/user-and-group-provisioning/scim-system-for-cross-domain-identity-management
- Locator: Prerequisites and Entra setup
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:analytics

Analytics interface. Documents adoption reports, detailed chat/model/tool exports and randomised or stable pseudonymous identifiers.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/administrators/insights-measurement/analytics-interface/analytics
- Locator: Reports; anonymisation; detailed interactions
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-09-03
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:audit

Audit logs. Defines privileged API event logging with self-service exclusions, deployment-specific retention and request-based export.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/operations/security-and-data-privacy/audit-logs
- Locator: Scope; exclusions; default basic mode; retention and export
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:security-export

Security Events Export. Documents Single-Tenant-only Azure Activity/Defender Event Hub export with seven-day replay, client-region selection and consumption cost.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/integrations-connectors/security-events-export-see
- Locator: Availability; delivered events; retention; cost
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-audit

Audit logs. API audit-event guide specifies basic/verbose modes and MT 90-day/ST five-year operational retention. It does not reconcile those event classes to DPA audit logs or a customer-specific contractual override.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/operations/security-and-data-privacy/audit-logs
- Locator: About audit logs; modes; Single and Multi Tenant Clients
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-dpa

Unique data processing addendum. The public July 2025 DPA specifies ten-year audit logs and CH storage, while Appendix A lists Microsoft and a client-chosen location. No signed current provider schedule, retention override or contract-precedence mapping was inspected.

- URL: https://www.unique.ai/data-processing-addendum
- Locator: Sections 3.15 and 6.1; Appendix A; July 2025 footer
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-retention

Retention and deletion at Unique. Hosted-only policy separates ordinary post-termination content retention, recoverable files and backups and permits contract customisation. Its log/key statements are not reconciled to audit-event/DPA/key-management scopes.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/security-and-compliance/data-protection/data-retention-and-data-deletion-at-unique
- Locator: Purpose; Data retention; Deletion after termination; Backups; Encryption in Place
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-04
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:dlp

Data leakage prevention integration. Describes customer-operated HTTPS/DLP proxy and post-chat analytics scanning rather than a default native PII-redaction feature.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/operations/security-and-data-privacy/data-leakage-prevention-dlp
- Locator: Proxy; analytics API; compatibility
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:single

Single-tenant security architecture. Documents separate Azure landing zone, network restrictions, retention and Unique-managed infrastructure keys.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/installing-and-upgrading-unique/install-unique/single-tenant/security-architecture-single-tenant
- Locator: Azure resources; SSO; encryption; monitoring
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-28
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:policy

Terms and conditions administration. Documents first-login acceptance, custom terms under an MSA and version/agreement export through GraphQL.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/operations/security-and-data-privacy/terms-and-conditions-administration
- Locator: First-login acceptance; MSA condition; API export
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-keys

Single-tenant key management. May 2026 key guide distinguishes imported customer-generated keys held by Unique from customer-exclusive key control via self-hosting. Its MT/ST CMK statement differs from the hosted retention page; actual MT configuration is unverified.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/installing-and-upgrading-unique/install-unique/single-tenant/security-architecture-single-tenant/key-management
- Locator: Infrastructure-only scope; PMK; BYOK/CYOK/HYOK; Summary
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-27
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-single

Single-tenant security architecture. Single-tenant guide documents separate landing zone, WAF/IP controls and Unique-managed encryption. Its 2048-bit RSA-HSM description differs from the hosted retention page; this does not establish an exact current key design.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/installing-and-upgrading-unique/install-unique/single-tenant/security-architecture-single-tenant
- Locator: Overview; Encryption; Data classification
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-28
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-compliance

Compliance Layer 3.0. The deployment matrix documents CH North multitenant hosting and selectable single/client-hosted regions, with deployment-specific controls. These are options, not proof of a particular customer contract or current key configuration.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/security-and-compliance/compliance/compliance-layer-3-0
- Locator: Digital Sovereignty; Feature overview matrix
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-27
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:install

Unique installation models. Enumerates multi-tenant, single-tenant, customer-managed and on-premise deployments.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/installing-and-upgrading-unique/install-unique
- Locator: Overview
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2025-08-06
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:review-contract-plan-gaps

onAI live general privacy and contract-request copy. General no-training, optional zero-retention and DPA/AI Act copy is published outside the plan cards, without a retrieved contract or eligibility mapping to Per seat and Flat price.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/#sovereignty
- Locator: No training on your data; EU-only processing on request; Everything your data protection officer will ask for; Request the DPA; Per seat/Flat price cards
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:terms

Unique terms of service. Describes a sales-conversation service with Order Form subscription fees, nonrenewal notice, recording export and proprietary rights; applicability to the current AI MSA needs confirmation.

- URL: https://www.unique.ai/terms-of-service
- Locator: Sections 1-2, 4-6, 11, 17-18
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:redaction

Chat data redaction and retention. Documents scheduled clearing of chat content and workspace records, with separate upload/KB retention rules.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/operations/security-and-data-privacy/data-redaction
- Locator: What is cleared; exclusions; administrator settings
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-10-18
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:public-compliance-display-20261026

onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor advertises a DPA, a public subprocessor list, retention periods and AI Act labels, but the DPA link opens contact rather than the documents.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: Everything your data protection officer will ask for; Swiss contract, two laws; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### onai:public-imprint-display-20261026

onAI imprint. The imprint identifies Telesoft AG in Oberwil-Lieli, Switzerland and Swiss VAT number CHE-106.160.588.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/impressum
- Locator: Contact; Represented by; VAT number; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 fcb4521fcdfb47e2ab714fee34a0fae0c1bdebca90481980bb3cb136410908fd
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### onai:public-website-privacy-display-20261026

onAI website privacy policy. The policy expressly covers the marketing website, including website processors and retention; it does not establish product workspace processor or retention terms.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/datenschutz
- Locator: Last updated October 2026; introductory scope; sections 5, 6 and 9; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 42ebec9df5cca263fd029ce2dcd8195487b6ee8e72cff07a6431731d8d462ec4
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:contact

Unique AI contact. Lists Unique AI AG in Zürich, Unique Germany GmbH in Berlin and other regional entities.

- URL: https://www.unique.ai/contact-us
- Locator: Office addresses
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-governance

Unique AI governance framework: contract access. The current governance framework says legal contracts and end-user T&Cs are available on request; the public page does not expose platform subscription or component licence clauses.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/security-and-compliance/ai-governance-framework
- Locator: Individual standards; Legal contracts; End-User Terms and Conditions
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-04-12
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:public-imprint

onAI imprint. The imprint identifies Telesoft AG in Oberwil-Lieli, Switzerland and Swiss VAT number CHE-106.160.588.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/impressum
- Locator: Contact; Represented by; VAT number
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:trust

Unique AI trust centre. Describes CH Azure storage separately from globally routed inference and claims ISO/SOC assurances, with differing SOC types in the FAQ.

- URL: https://www.unique.ai/trust-center
- Locator: Enterprise security; compliance standards; FAQ
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:iso42001

Unique ISO/IEC 42001 certificate. TÜV SÜD certificate covers development/deployment SaaS for financial services using pretrained foundation models or client-provided models, valid to 6 March 2028.

- URL: https://www.unique.ai/hubfs/ISO%2042001_Unique_EN_2025.pdf
- Locator: One page; registration 99 420 00001; scope and dates
- Evidence kind: certificate-verified
- Source date: 2025-03-07
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21
- Issuer: TÜV SÜD South Asia Private Limited
- Certificate scope: Unique AG, Stockerstr.34, Zurich. Development and deployment of SaaS for financial-services clients based on pretrained AI foundation models using Azure OpenAI or client-provided models, including client on-premise models.
- Valid: 2025-03-07 to 2028-03-06

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso-docs

ISO Certifications and current downloads. The ISO documentation links 2026 English/German ATTESTA ISO27001 and ISO9001 renewals, plus the 2025 ISO42001 certificate; ISO27001 SoA requires an NDA.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/security-and-compliance/compliance/certifications/iso-certifications
- Locator: Certificate ISO27001; ISO9001; ISO42001; Statement of Applicability
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-08-05
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso27001

Unique AG ISO27001 ATTESTA 2026 renewal. Inspected ATTESTA ISO27001:2022 renewal for Unique AG, registration 223-06-018.I, issued 10 June 2026 after 4 June surveillance, valid until 31 May 2029. The certificate-linked public register lists the same number and expiry.

- URL: https://unique-ch.atlassian.net/wiki/rest/api/content/1384809423/child/attachment/att2423750716/download
- Locator: One-page 2026 English certificate; scope, registration, surveillance, printed expiry
- Evidence kind: certificate-verified
- Source date: 2026-06-10
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21
- Issuer: ATTESTA Schweizer Zertifizierungsgesellschaft AG
- Certificate scope: Unique AG, Stockerstrasse 34, 8002 Zürich: development, operation, trading and distribution of software and provision of IT/information-technology services; ISO27001:2022 information security management
- Valid: start not stated to 2029-05-31
- Registry: https://www.ic-register.com/?qry=Unique&handler=Process

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso9001

Unique AG ISO9001 ATTESTA 2026 renewal. Inspected ATTESTA ISO9001:2015 renewal for Unique AG, registration 223-06-017.Q, issued 10 June 2026 after 4 June surveillance, valid until 31 May 2029. The certificate-linked public register lists the same number and expiry.

- URL: https://unique-ch.atlassian.net/wiki/rest/api/content/1384809423/child/attachment/att2423750710/download
- Locator: One-page 2026 English certificate; scope, registration, surveillance, printed expiry
- Evidence kind: certificate-verified
- Source date: 2026-06-10
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21
- Issuer: ATTESTA Schweizer Zertifizierungsgesellschaft AG
- Certificate scope: Unique AG, Stockerstrasse 34, 8002 Zürich: development, operation, trading and distribution of software and provision of IT/information-technology services; ISO9001:2015 quality management
- Valid: start not stated to 2029-05-31
- Registry: https://www.ic-register.com/?qry=Unique&handler=Process

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-iso-register

Certificate-linked public register: Unique AG. Public certificate-linked register lookup for Unique AG lists registrations 223-06-018.I and 223-06-017.Q, Zurich, software/IT scope and expiry 31 May 2029. Standard/status text fields are blank; certificate PDFs supply the standards.

- URL: https://www.ic-register.com/?qry=Unique&handler=Process
- Locator: Unique AG result rows; registration, scope, expiry
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-soc

SOC2 Type2: chronology and report access. The dedicated SOC page explains Type1 in December 2023 followed by Type2 in January 2025; audit report and certificate are available only on request after NDA. Auditor, service scope and actual reporting period were not publicly inspected.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/security-and-compliance/compliance/certifications/soc-2-type-2
- Locator: SOC2 Type2 timeline; Certificates/report access
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: 2026-04-12
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026

onAI automation and open interfaces. The homepage labels its own workflow engine and MCP coming soon. Until then it describes n8n integration operated by onAI, the customer or a partner, with custom workflows as a requested service. No native release date or schedule/trigger entitlement is published.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: Automation platform, Open interfaces and service sections; HTTP 200, body SHA256 a074779dc4d08c5e48440218bbc01353565673585b9e0f7eab517ed9687b77fa
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-terms-admin

Terms and Conditions Administration. Current platform T&C administration refers to a customer MSA and gated admin export; it does not publish the vendor platform agreement or determine subscription/IP/branding clauses.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/operations/security-and-data-privacy/terms-and-conditions-administration
- Locator: Overview; MSA exceptions; Modifying/Exporting Terms and Conditions
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-08
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:public-processing

onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor claims no model training, filtered search/image prompts and an optional EU-only processing tier with provider zero retention; contracts and provider exceptions are not supplied.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: What leaves, and how > No training; Personal data; European AI; EU-only processing on request
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:public-pricing

onAI public product and pricing page. Published EUR pricing is 17 per user/month with 5 of monthly model budget; a flat annual price is on request, with unlimited users and dedicated/on-premises options.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: Pay per seat, or one price for everyone > Per seat; Flat price; prices excluding VAT
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:ecb-fx

ECB euro reference exchange rates. On 2026-10-20 one EUR equals USD 1.1215 and CHF 0.9237; USD to EUR is the reciprocal, 0.8916629514043692.

- URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/eurofxref/eurofxref-hist-90d.xml
- Locator: Cube time=2026-10-20; currency USD and CHF
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-10-20
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:review-plan-m365

onAI live pricing: named Microsoft 365 plan scope. The Per seat card expressly includes Microsoft 365 answers and the Flat price card includes everything in Per seat; the cards do not establish separate DPA, provider-retention or support entitlements.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/#pricing
- Locator: Per seat > Answers from Microsoft 365, with each user’s own permissions; Flat price > Everything in Per seat, for every employee
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:review-residency-parts

onAI live residency statements and external processing paths. The page separately describes European application/storage infrastructure, named dedicated locations, external AI/search/image/translation services and an optional EU-only AI-processing tier; its unqualified secured-EU-server line does not establish default end-to-end processing, backup, log or support-access residency.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/#sovereignty
- Locator: Ready for your security review; European from the contract down to the DNS; Where your data lives; External services, filtered; EU-only processing on request; pricing cards
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:platform

Unique AI platform. Markets a modular finance platform with governed connectors, frontend, financial agents and APIs.

- URL: https://www.unique.ai/en/platform
- Locator: Frontend, financial agents, MCP Hub; deployment section
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:ecb-fx

ECB euro foreign exchange reference rates, 20 October 2026. ECB records EUR 1 = USD 1.1215 and CHF 0.9237 on 20 October 2026; derived USD to EUR is 1/1.1215 and CHF to EUR is 1/0.9237.

- URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/eurofxref/eurofxref-hist.xml
- Locator: Cube time="2026-10-20": USD and CHF
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-10-20
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-governance-20261026

Unique AI governance framework: contract access. The current governance framework says legal contracts and end-user T&Cs are available on request; the public page does not expose platform subscription or component licence clauses.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/security-and-compliance/ai-governance-framework
- Locator: Individual standards; Legal contracts; End-User Terms and Conditions
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-04-12
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:reference-licence-20261026

Unique public reference repository licence. The public repository defaults to Unique License v1 unless an explicit licence says otherwise; commercial use, distribution and modifications require prior approval. The default is restricted source-available, not an OSI open-source licence.

- URL: https://github.com/Unique-AG/ai/blob/afa596c9b4b0231895ff70f44029a9a525f746e9/LICENSE
- Locator: LICENSE, repository-wide disclaimer and exceptions
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:unique-licence-v1-20261026

Unique License v1. The published full licence permits personal noncommercial use and requires prior written approval for commercial use, distribution and modification, with separate component-licence exceptions. Swiss law and Zurich venue are specified.

- URL: https://github.com/Unique-AG/license/releases/tag/unique-license.v1
- Locator: Grant, Restrictions, Open Source Components, Governing Law
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2024-09-24
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk-licence-20261026

Unique Python SDK MIT licence. The Python SDK directory has an explicit MIT licence permitting commercial use and modification subject to notice requirements; this exception does not license the hosted platform.

- URL: https://github.com/Unique-AG/ai/blob/afa596c9b4b0231895ff70f44029a9a525f746e9/unique_sdk/LICENSE
- Locator: unique_sdk/LICENSE, explicit component exception
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:sdk-package-20261026

Unique SDK package metadata. At the pinned October 23 repository commit, unique_sdk package metadata declares MIT, consistent with its component licence. Repository/package version is not treated as the hosted release date.

- URL: https://github.com/Unique-AG/ai/blob/afa596c9b4b0231895ff70f44029a9a525f746e9/unique_sdk/pyproject.toml
- Locator: project name/version and licence
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### unique-ai:unique-ai:review2-terms-admin-20261026

Terms and Conditions Administration. Current platform T&C administration refers to a customer MSA and gated admin export; it does not publish the vendor platform agreement or determine subscription/IP/branding clauses.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/it-operators/operations/security-and-data-privacy/terms-and-conditions-administration
- Locator: Overview; MSA exceptions; Modifying/Exporting Terms and Conditions
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: 2026-05-08
- Retrieved: 2026-10-26

### onai:public-services

onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor offers tailored training, workshops and custom agent services; Flat price lists onboarding, training and workshops without itemised service prices.

- URL: https://onaihq.com/
- Locator: AI Trainings; AI Workshops; Custom AI Agent Development; Flat price inclusions
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### onai:review-status-service-scope

onAI live public status service scope. The public status page lists Website and notice history; it does not identify a Per seat or Flat price workspace service or a contractual SLA.

- URL: https://onai.instatus.com
- Locator: Service list and recent notice history, retrieved 2026-10-21
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:support

Enterprise support. Provides public multitenant status link, enterprise email and a contract-specific dedicated support model.

- URL: https://docs.unique.ai/enterprise-support
- Locator: Contact; dedicated support model; hours
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:status

Unique public system status. Public status page displays service/API/collector components and historical uptime panels; dedicated environments are outside the documented status scope.

- URL: https://status.prod.unique.app/
- Locator: Component and 90-day uptime panels
- Evidence kind: documented
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21

### unique-ai:unique-ai:homepage

Unique AI finance platform. Markets embedded experts and structured training programmes for finance users and IT.

- URL: https://www.unique.ai/
- Locator: Forward-Deployed Engineers and training section
- Evidence kind: vendor-claimed
- Source date: Not stated
- Retrieved: 2026-10-21
