--- schema_version: 1 rubric_version: "1.1" kind: pair canonical_url: "https://onaihq.com/compare/agents/librechat-vs-onai/" data_url: "https://onaihq.com/compare/agents/librechat-vs-onai/data.json" generated_at: 2026-10-27 last_checked_at: 2026-10-26 last_cross_checked_at: 2026-10-26 next_check_at: 2026-12-20 publisher: "onAI" --- # LibreChat vs onAI > Published by onAI. onAI also sells one of the products compared here. Findings about other products link to public sources so you can check them; statements about onAI are marked as stated by onAI. This comparison has 16 criteria with sourced findings for both products, including 14 that a second agent cross-checked for both. 48 criteria have a sourced finding for at least one product, and 44 carry a statement by onAI. "Sourced" findings passed publication validation: they are scoped, fresh and cite public resolved sources. "Agent cross-checked" findings also received a separate agent source pass, not necessarily a hands-on test. "Stated by onAI" marks the publisher's own statements about its product (evidence type vendor-statement), which cite no third-party source. Humans approve the rubric, templates and generator; they do not review every finding. It does not declare a winner. A missing sourced finding is not evidence that a capability is absent. - LibreChat source checks: 2026-10-21 to 2026-10-26. - onAI source checks: 2026-10-21 to 2026-10-26. - Canonical HTML: https://onaihq.com/compare/agents/librechat-vs-onai/ - Machine-readable JSON: https://onaihq.com/compare/agents/librechat-vs-onai/data.json - Methodology: https://onaihq.com/compare/agents/methodology/ ## Models ### MOD-01: Model catalogue and providers Judgment rule: List each available model by provider and plan, including reasoning, fast and multimodal variants. Record whether the user picks the model, the product routes automatically, or both. A provider counts only if at least one of its current models is selectable on the scoped plan. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The model catalog is configured by the customer across first-party provider integrations and custom endpoints. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - providers: Documented routes include OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock and custom compatible services; selection requires enabled credentials and model access. - current_models: v0.8.8 release notes mention GPT-6/GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Opus/Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash support. Actual selectable IDs still depend on the installed configuration and provider account. - auto_routing: Does the product route between models automatically, and is the chosen model shown? No automatic routing policy showing a chosen model was established, and no configured endpoint was exercised. - multimodal_input: Provider-native files support images/PDFs and some providers accept additional Office/audio/video types. Exact acceptance depends on the selected model and transport; no matrix was tested. - providers — Which model providers are available? [partial]: Documented routes include OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock and custom compatible services; selection requires enabled credentials and model access. Sources: librechat:librechat:custom, librechat:librechat:azure, librechat:librechat:bedrock, librechat:librechat:vertex. - current_models — Which current models are selectable on this plan? [partial]: v0.8.8 release notes mention GPT-6/GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Opus/Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash support. Actual selectable IDs still depend on the installed configuration and provider account. Sources: librechat:librechat:releases. - user_choice — Can users pick the model per chat? [supported]: Users choose an endpoint/model unless admins enforce model specs or a fixed Agent. Sources: librechat:librechat:modelspec, librechat:librechat:agents. - auto_routing — Does the product route between models automatically, and is the chosen model shown? [unknown]: auto_routing: Does the product route between models automatically, and is the chosen model shown? No automatic routing policy showing a chosen model was established, and no configured endpoint was exercised. - multimodal_input — Which models accept images, audio or files? [partial]: Provider-native files support images/PDFs and some providers accept additional Office/audio/video types. Exact acceptance depends on the selected model and transport; no matrix was tested. Sources: librechat:librechat:ocr. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:custom, librechat:librechat:azure, librechat:librechat:bedrock, librechat:librechat:vertex, librechat:librechat:releases, librechat:librechat:modelspec, librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:ocr #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The public page offers user-selectable Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok and Mistral families. Exact chat model versions, automatic routing and per-model input capabilities are not established. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat and Flat price public offers; exact model entitlements unspecified; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Unspecified by source; os=not specified. Limitations: - Model-family marketing is not a tested model inventory or a release-lag measurement. - providers — Which model providers are available? [supported]: The vendor names Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI and Mistral AI model families; current selectable provider inventory was not observed. Sources: onai:public-models-display-20261026. - current_models — Which current models are selectable on this plan? [partial]: The page names Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok and Mistral families, but supplies no complete versioned chat-model list per plan. Sources: onai:public-models-display-20261026. - user_choice — Can users pick the model per chat? [supported]: Employees choose a model for a task within the administrator-approved set. Sources: onai:public-models-display-20261026. - auto_routing — Does the product route between models automatically, and is the chosen model shown? [unknown]: The public model section does not establish automatic routing or disclosure of its selected model; no app fixture was run. - multimodal_input — Which models accept images, audio or files? [unknown]: Public chat-model copy does not map image, audio or file input to named model versions. Image Studio is a separate capability. Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-models-display-20261026 ### MOD-02: Model freshness Judgment rule: Measure the days from a provider's general release to availability in the product for the last three major releases from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google (and Mistral where offered). Use dated changelogs or observation. Record deprecation notice for retired models. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Dated releases document model updates, but measured availability lags and retirement notice periods remain unknown. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - release_lag_days: What was the lag for each of the last three major releases, per provider? No paired general-release/LibreChat-availability dates for the last three major releases per provider, or binding retirement-notice period, were established. - deprecation_notice: How much notice is given before a model is removed? No paired general-release/LibreChat-availability dates for the last three major releases per provider, or binding retirement-notice period, were established. - version_pinning: Admins can name explicit model IDs in endpoints/model specs; continuing remote availability remains under provider control. - release_lag_days — What was the lag for each of the last three major releases, per provider? [unknown]: release_lag_days: What was the lag for each of the last three major releases, per provider? No paired general-release/LibreChat-availability dates for the last three major releases per provider, or binding retirement-notice period, were established. - changelog — Is there a dated public model changelog? [supported]: Public releases and the LibreChat changelog date model updates; v0.8.8 was published 2026-10-01. Sources: librechat:librechat:releases. - deprecation_notice — How much notice is given before a model is removed? [unknown]: deprecation_notice: How much notice is given before a model is removed? No paired general-release/LibreChat-availability dates for the last three major releases per provider, or binding retirement-notice period, were established. - version_pinning — Can an admin keep an older model version? [partial]: Admins can name explicit model IDs in endpoints/model specs; continuing remote availability remains under provider control. Sources: librechat:librechat:modelspec, librechat:librechat:custom. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:releases, librechat:librechat:modelspec, librechat:librechat:custom #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. We enable new models shortly after their release. ### MOD-03: Bring-your-own keys and provider contracts Judgment rule: Record customer-held API keys, customer cloud accounts (Azure OpenAI, Bedrock, Vertex), and aggregator routes (OpenRouter, LiteLLM) as separate routes. Record what still works without a vendor-provided model, whether prices change with BYO, and documented restrictions. API-key support does not imply support for the customer's own Azure contract. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Customer-held provider keys, customer Azure/AWS/Vertex configurations and custom endpoints are documented. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - byo_restrictions: File modalities, tools and other capabilities depend on provider/model support and optional services. A universal BYO feature-parity guarantee was not established. - own_api_keys — Can the customer use its own provider API keys? [supported]: Provider keys can be operator-supplied or user_provided, with user key controls in Settings. Sources: librechat:librechat:firstchat, librechat:librechat:custom. - own_cloud_contract — Can it use its own Azure OpenAI, Bedrock or Vertex deployment? [supported]: Customer Azure OpenAI deployments, AWS Bedrock region/credentials and Anthropic Vertex project/region routes are documented separately. Sources: librechat:librechat:azure, librechat:librechat:bedrock, librechat:librechat:vertex. - custom_endpoint — Can an admin add any OpenAI-compatible endpoint? [supported]: Operators can configure a custom compatible API URL and model list. Sources: librechat:librechat:custom. - byo_pricing — Does BYO change the licence price? [supported]: MIT repository use has no per-seat licence fee; customers separately procure provider service usage. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:firstchat. - byo_restrictions — Which features stop working with BYO? [partial]: File modalities, tools and other capabilities depend on provider/model support and optional services. A universal BYO feature-parity guarantee was not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:ocr, librechat:librechat:code. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:firstchat, librechat:librechat:custom, librechat:librechat:azure, librechat:librechat:bedrock, librechat:librechat:vertex, librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:ocr, librechat:librechat:code #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Your own provider contracts and API keys (for example Azure, OpenRouter) are possible on request. ### MOD-04: Local and self-hosted models Judgment rule: Record support for models running in the customer's environment (vLLM, Ollama, TGI or similar) and which features work with them: chat, RAG, tools, embeddings. Distinguish a documented, supported route from a generic endpoint that happens to work. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Local compatible inference and Ollama embeddings are documented; optional services must also be local for a fully private stack. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - feature_parity: Chat and retrieval can use local endpoints. Tool calling and vision depend on the model; external OCR/search/code services are separate. No complete offline fixture was run. - vendor_hosted_open_models: Does the vendor host open-weight models in EU/CH? A vendor-hosted EU/Swiss open-weight model service was not established for the MIT self-hosted project. - self_hosted_chat — Can chat use a customer-hosted model? [supported]: Custom endpoints can point at customer-hosted compatible model servers, including Ollama-compatible setups. Sources: librechat:librechat:custom. - self_hosted_embeddings — Can retrieval use customer-hosted embeddings? [supported]: The RAG configuration documents Ollama embeddings and local Hugging Face through the appropriate full image. Sources: librechat:librechat:ragcfg. - feature_parity — Which features fail with self-hosted models? [partial]: Chat and retrieval can use local endpoints. Tool calling and vision depend on the model; external OCR/search/code services are separate. No complete offline fixture was run. Sources: librechat:librechat:ragcfg, librechat:librechat:ocr, librechat:librechat:code. - vendor_hosted_open_models — Does the vendor host open-weight models in EU/CH? [unknown]: vendor_hosted_open_models: Does the vendor host open-weight models in EU/CH? A vendor-hosted EU/Swiss open-weight model service was not established for the MIT self-hosted project. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:custom, librechat:librechat:ragcfg, librechat:librechat:ocr, librechat:librechat:code #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. With on-premises, local models can be connected (for example via Ollama). ### MOD-05: Model control and usage limits Judgment rule: Record admin allow-lists per group, default models, restrictions on which models may see which data, and per-user rate or fair-use limits. Test one restriction with two users in different groups. Record limits as enforced stops, warnings or undocumented fair use. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Model specs and scoped configuration can limit choices; optional user credit reservations provide a blocking mechanism. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - model_allowlist_by_group: Enforced model specs and role/group configuration overrides can restrict available endpoints/models. The separate management UI is preview; a two-group fixture was not run. - data_bound_models: Can admins restrict which models receive connector or knowledge content? A hard binding between each enterprise content source and a permitted model provider was not established in the Agent and access-control guides. - user_limits: Balance tracking, initial credits/refills and message moderation limits are operator-configurable, rather than a universal vendor allowance. - model_allowlist_by_group — Can admins limit models per group? [partial]: Enforced model specs and role/group configuration overrides can restrict available endpoints/models. The separate management UI is preview; a two-group fixture was not run. Sources: librechat:librechat:modelspec, librechat:librechat:admin, librechat:librechat:access. - data_bound_models — Can admins restrict which models receive connector or knowledge content? [unknown]: data_bound_models: Can admins restrict which models receive connector or knowledge content? A hard binding between each enterprise content source and a permitted model provider was not established in the Agent and access-control guides. - default_model — Can admins set the default model? [supported]: Model-spec presets can define default endpoint/model configurations. Sources: librechat:librechat:modelspec. - user_limits — What per-user message or token limits apply, and are they published? [partial]: Balance tracking, initial credits/refills and message moderation limits are operator-configurable, rather than a universal vendor allowance. Sources: librechat:librechat:balance, librechat:librechat:mod. - limit_behaviour — What happens when a limit is reached? [supported]: Pinned checkBalance reserves credits and throws a TOKEN_BALANCE error when insufficient. This establishes a blocking code path, not an observed end-to-end quota test. Sources: librechat:librechat:balance-pin. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:modelspec, librechat:librechat:admin, librechat:librechat:access, librechat:librechat:balance, librechat:librechat:mod, librechat:librechat:balance-pin #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source. Admins decide per group which models are allowed. ## Company knowledge ### KNOW-01: Files in chat Judgment rule: Record supported formats, size and count limits, scanned-PDF OCR, tables and spreadsheets, images inside documents, and whether a file is read in full or retrieved in chunks. Upload the shared fixture set (long German PDF, scanned contract, Excel with formulas, PowerPoint) and record failures. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Files can be indexed, injected as extracted text or sent directly to compatible model providers. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=New spreadsheet finding at development source a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b; earlier accepted facts retain their cited release pins; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - File counts, sizes and provider acceptance depend on deployment settings. - Spreadsheet parsing yields named sheets and CSV values; layout/formula fidelity and the shared fixture remain untested. - formats — Which formats are accepted? [supported]: Documents include PDF/text/Office formats through configured extraction; provider-native acceptance varies, including Bedrock Office formats and Google audio/video. Sources: librechat:librechat:ocr, librechat:librechat:filecfg. - limits — What size and count limits apply per file and chat? [partial]: File counts, sizes and MIME patterns are operator/endpoint settings; provider limits may be stricter. The shared fixture was not uploaded. Sources: librechat:librechat:filecfg, librechat:librechat:ocr. - ocr — Are scanned PDFs read? [supported]: Optional Mistral OCR, Azure/Vertex Mistral OCR and provider-native file processing are documented. Sources: librechat:librechat:ocr. - spreadsheets — Are Excel tables read with structure intact? [partial]: The inspected built-in XLSX/XLS/ODS parser emits each sheet name and CSV values. The current guide lists a 15 MB built-in parser limit. Workbook formatting, formula recalculation and shared-fixture accuracy were not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:r4-spreadsheet-parser, librechat:librechat:r4-text-current. - full_vs_chunked — Is the whole file used or only retrieved parts, and does the user see which? [supported]: RAG retrieves indexed chunks; Upload as Text and Agent File Context inject extracted full text, subject to context limits. Sources: librechat:librechat:rag, librechat:librechat:text, librechat:librechat:ocr. Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-25. Sources: librechat:librechat:ocr, librechat:librechat:filecfg, librechat:librechat:rag, librechat:librechat:text, librechat:librechat:r4-spreadsheet-parser, librechat:librechat:r4-text-current #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Upload PDF, Word, Excel and other files directly in the chat and ask about them. ### KNOW-02: Knowledge bases and shared collections Judgment rule: Record curated document collections that persist across chats, who can create and share them, size limits, and how they attach to assistants. Distinguish personal, group and organisation-wide scope. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Agents and personal Projects keep files across chats; shared Agent access is distinct from personal Project ownership. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - sharing_scope: Agents can share files/knowledge with permitted users/groups/roles; Projects themselves are personal and cannot be shared or transferred. - size_limits: What are the collection limits? No universal collection storage/size allowance was established; limits are deployment and file-configuration dependent. - persistent_collections — Can users keep document collections across chats? [supported]: Agent File Search/File Context and Project reference files persist for later chats. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:projects. - sharing_scope — Can collections be shared with users, groups or the whole organisation? [partial]: Agents can share files/knowledge with permitted users/groups/roles; Projects themselves are personal and cannot be shared or transferred. Sources: librechat:librechat:access, librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:projects. - size_limits — What are the collection limits? [unknown]: size_limits: What are the collection limits? No universal collection storage/size allowance was established; limits are deployment and file-configuration dependent. - assistant_binding — Can collections be bound to an assistant? [supported]: Agent File Search and File Context bind retrieved or extracted knowledge to an Agent. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:ocr. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:projects, librechat:librechat:access, librechat:librechat:ocr #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Shared knowledge collections with access rights per group. ### KNOW-03: Enterprise connectors Judgment rule: List each connector separately with plan, availability and setup owner: SharePoint, OneDrive, Outlook, Teams, Google Drive, Gmail, Confluence, Jira, Notion, Box, Salesforce, ServiceNow, file shares. Record whether the vendor or a third party (or the customer via MCP) provides it, and whether it needs admin consent. A connector listed on a roadmap or partner page is `announced`. An on-prem connector or gateway proves access to local data, not a self-hosted platform (DATA-02). #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial SharePoint and OneDrive have a documented delegated file picker. Other enterprise systems require separately verified tools or connectors. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - microsoft_365: SharePoint Online and OneDrive for Business can be browsed and attached through Entra token reuse/OBO, delegated AllSites.Read and Files.Read.All, and admin consent. Outlook/Teams source access was not established. - google_workspace: Which Google sources are connected? Google Drive/Gmail, Confluence/Jira and other named business-system connectors were not verified from first-party maintained connector documentation; generic MCP compatibility is not a connector catalog. - atlassian: Confluence and Jira? Google Drive/Gmail, Confluence/Jira and other named business-system connectors were not verified from first-party maintained connector documentation; generic MCP compatibility is not a connector catalog. - other_systems: Which other business systems? Google Drive/Gmail, Confluence/Jira and other named business-system connectors were not verified from first-party maintained connector documentation; generic MCP compatibility is not a connector catalog. - on_prem_sources: Custom local MCP stdio servers can reach systems available to the deployment, but a maintained file-share/database connector and its permissions were not verified. - microsoft_365 — Which M365 sources (SharePoint, OneDrive, Outlook, Teams) are connected? [partial]: SharePoint Online and OneDrive for Business can be browsed and attached through Entra token reuse/OBO, delegated AllSites.Read and Files.Read.All, and admin consent. Outlook/Teams source access was not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:sharepoint. - google_workspace — Which Google sources are connected? [unknown]: google_workspace: Which Google sources are connected? Google Drive/Gmail, Confluence/Jira and other named business-system connectors were not verified from first-party maintained connector documentation; generic MCP compatibility is not a connector catalog. - atlassian — Confluence and Jira? [unknown]: atlassian: Confluence and Jira? Google Drive/Gmail, Confluence/Jira and other named business-system connectors were not verified from first-party maintained connector documentation; generic MCP compatibility is not a connector catalog. - other_systems — Which other business systems? [unknown]: other_systems: Which other business systems? Google Drive/Gmail, Confluence/Jira and other named business-system connectors were not verified from first-party maintained connector documentation; generic MCP compatibility is not a connector catalog. - on_prem_sources — Can on-prem file shares or databases be connected? [partial]: Custom local MCP stdio servers can reach systems available to the deployment, but a maintained file-share/database connector and its permissions were not verified. Sources: librechat:librechat:mcpcfg. - connector_provider — Who builds and maintains each connector? [supported]: LibreChat documents the Microsoft picker. Other MCP tool integrations are separately configured and maintained by their respective server authors/operators. Sources: librechat:librechat:sharepoint, librechat:librechat:mcp. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:sharepoint, librechat:librechat:mcpcfg, librechat:librechat:mcp #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The vendor describes live Microsoft 365 access with specific delegated permissions. Other connector names are marketing leads with incomplete source and plan scope. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Microsoft 365 listed in Per seat and Flat price; optional Microsoft licences/permissions apply; add_ons=Optional existing Microsoft 365 Copilot licence for semantic search and meeting notes; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Source tenant region and model processing region depend on customer configuration; os=not specified. Limitations: - Microsoft 365 claims are vendor statements, not an observed tenant connection. Generic connector examples are not individually verified integrations. - microsoft_365 — Which M365 sources (SharePoint, OneDrive, Outlook, Teams) are connected? [supported]: The page lists SharePoint/OneDrive files, SharePoint pages/lists, Outlook mail/attachments, calendar, Teams chats, OneNote, To Do/Planner and directory. Channels and meeting transcripts require additional admin approval; semantic Copilot search/meeting notes require eligible Microsoft 365 Copilot licences. Sources: onai:public-m365-display-20261026, onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026. - google_workspace — Which Google sources are connected? [unknown]: The page’s Google sign-in is not a Google Drive/Gmail connector specification. No scoped Google Workspace data connector or trial was verified. - atlassian — Confluence and Jira? [partial]: The FAQ names Confluence as a standard-connector example without setup, plan or permission details. Jira availability is not established. Sources: onai:public-other-connectors-display-20261026. - other_systems — Which other business systems? [partial]: The FAQ names S3 and proprietary data sources through connectors or an API. No source-by-source catalogue for Notion, Box, Salesforce or ServiceNow was obtained. Sources: onai:public-other-connectors-display-20261026. - on_prem_sources — Can on-prem file shares or databases be connected? [unknown]: Custom database and on-premises hosting copy does not establish an operational file-share/database connector, network gateway or associated plan requirements. - connector_provider — Who builds and maintains each connector? [partial]: onAI says its Microsoft app supplies the Microsoft 365 connection and IT approves delegated permissions; no provider/maintenance contract is specified for the other example connectors. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026. Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-m365-display-20261026, onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:public-other-connectors-display-20261026 ### KNOW-04: Permission-aware retrieval Judgment rule: Using two test users, verify that a restricted document in the fixture tenant is never cited or summarised for the user without access, including after a permission change. Record whether permissions are enforced at query time by the source system, mirrored into an index, or not enforced. Record the propagation delay of a revocation. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Product resource ACLs and delegated Microsoft file selection are documented. Continuing source permissions for copied content remain untested. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - source_permissions_respected: Are source permissions enforced per user? No restricted-document two-user fixture or grant/revocation test was run. Source permission enforcement, revocation delay and Purview label handling remain unverified. - enforcement_point: LibreChat ACLs control Agent/file resources; Microsoft delegated OBO limits source downloads as the signed-in user. No query-time source ACL check for previously copied chunks was established. - revocation_delay: How quickly does a removed permission take effect? No restricted-document two-user fixture or grant/revocation test was run. Source permission enforcement, revocation delay and Purview label handling remain unverified. - admin_scope_controls: Operators can scope Agent/resource grants and its selected files. Site/folder/label exclusion across sources was not established. - sensitivity_labels: Are Microsoft Purview or similar labels respected? No restricted-document two-user fixture or grant/revocation test was run. Source permission enforcement, revocation delay and Purview label handling remain unverified. - source_permissions_respected — Are source permissions enforced per user? [unknown]: source_permissions_respected: Are source permissions enforced per user? No restricted-document two-user fixture or grant/revocation test was run. Source permission enforcement, revocation delay and Purview label handling remain unverified. - enforcement_point — Does the source system, a mirrored index or nothing enforce them? [partial]: LibreChat ACLs control Agent/file resources; Microsoft delegated OBO limits source downloads as the signed-in user. No query-time source ACL check for previously copied chunks was established. Sources: librechat:librechat:access, librechat:librechat:sharepoint. - revocation_delay — How quickly does a removed permission take effect? [unknown]: revocation_delay: How quickly does a removed permission take effect? No restricted-document two-user fixture or grant/revocation test was run. Source permission enforcement, revocation delay and Purview label handling remain unverified. - admin_scope_controls — Can admins exclude sites, folders or labels? [partial]: Operators can scope Agent/resource grants and its selected files. Site/folder/label exclusion across sources was not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:access, librechat:librechat:agents. - sensitivity_labels — Are Microsoft Purview or similar labels respected? [unknown]: sensitivity_labels: Are Microsoft Purview or similar labels respected? No restricted-document two-user fixture or grant/revocation test was run. Source permission enforcement, revocation delay and Purview label handling remain unverified. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:access, librechat:librechat:sharepoint, librechat:librechat:agents #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial For Microsoft 365 the vendor claims per-user source permission checks at query time. Revocation delay, site exclusions and sensitivity-label behavior have not been tested. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat; Flat price includes everything in Per seat. Microsoft 365 connector consent and source-account access required.; add_ons=Customer Microsoft account and required delegated consent; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Customer Microsoft tenant; receiving model region configured separately; os=not specified. Limitations: - Scope is the live Microsoft 365 connector. Native knowledge collection ACLs and copied/shared answers require separate checks. - Public pricing explicitly includes Microsoft 365 in Per seat and inherits it in Flat price. This establishes advertised plan scope, not a completed permission or deletion-propagation fixture. - source_permissions_respected — Are source permissions enforced per user? [supported]: The vendor says onAI makes delegated read-only requests as the signed-in user and Microsoft checks that person’s source access. No two-user restricted-folder fixture was run. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026. - enforcement_point — Does the source system, a mirrored index or nothing enforce them? [supported]: Microsoft is the stated enforcement point for live requests; the page says no mirrored Microsoft 365 library index is created. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026. - revocation_delay — How quickly does a removed permission take effect? [unknown]: No measured permission-revocation propagation interval is published and no revoke/grant fixture was run. - admin_scope_controls — Can admins exclude sites, folders or labels? [unknown]: The page lists optional source permissions and model restrictions but does not establish site/folder/label exclusion controls. - sensitivity_labels — Are Microsoft Purview or similar labels respected? [unknown]: No Microsoft Purview sensitivity-label handling specification or label fixture was obtained. Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026, onai:review-plan-m365-display-20261026 ### KNOW-05: Freshness and sync model Judgment rule: Record live (federated) search versus a copied index, sync interval, deletion propagation, and where the index is stored. Edit and delete one fixture document and record when answers change. A copied index adds storage location to DATA-01. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The RAG API copies uploaded content into PGVector; imported files do not by themselves establish live enterprise synchronization. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - sync_interval: How often does an index refresh? No periodic enterprise-source sync contract, source edit/delete propagation bound or timed fixture was established from the RAG and Microsoft import guides. - deletion_propagation: How quickly does a deleted document disappear? No periodic enterprise-source sync contract, source edit/delete propagation bound or timed fixture was established from the RAG and Microsoft import guides. - live_or_indexed — Is content searched live or copied into an index? [supported]: The RAG API indexes uploaded documents into PostgreSQL/PGVector; file-context mode stores extracted text in Agent instructions. Sources: librechat:librechat:rag, librechat:librechat:ocr. - sync_interval — How often does an index refresh? [unknown]: sync_interval: How often does an index refresh? No periodic enterprise-source sync contract, source edit/delete propagation bound or timed fixture was established from the RAG and Microsoft import guides. - deletion_propagation — How quickly does a deleted document disappear? [unknown]: deletion_propagation: How quickly does a deleted document disappear? No periodic enterprise-source sync contract, source edit/delete propagation bound or timed fixture was established from the RAG and Microsoft import guides. - index_location — Where is indexed content stored? [supported]: The operator chooses the RAG database and its location, independently of the inference provider. Sources: librechat:librechat:rag, librechat:librechat:compose-pin. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:rag, librechat:librechat:ocr, librechat:librechat:compose-pin #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Microsoft 365 is described as live retrieval without a second library index. Content read into a chat remains in that conversation, and no edit/delete timing was measured. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat; Flat price includes everything in Per seat. Microsoft 365 connector consent and source-account access required.; add_ons=Microsoft delegated connector consent; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Source data in customer Microsoft tenant; chat storage per deployment; os=not specified. Limitations: - This is the Microsoft 365 sync model only. Uploaded knowledge collections use a separate storage/retrieval mechanism. - Public pricing explicitly includes Microsoft 365 in Per seat and inherits it in Flat price. This establishes advertised plan scope, not a completed permission or deletion-propagation fixture. - live_or_indexed — Is content searched live or copied into an index? [supported]: The vendor describes live Microsoft 365 reads, no copied library and no background synchronisation. This statement does not cover uploaded knowledge-base documents. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026. - sync_interval — How often does an index refresh? [supported]: The described Microsoft 365 route has no library-index sync job; source service search freshness still depends on Microsoft. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026. - deletion_propagation — How quickly does a deleted document disappear? [unknown]: No edit/delete fixture was run. The page says material already read stays in the user’s chat, so source deletion cannot be treated as retroactive chat erasure. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026. - index_location — Where is indexed content stored? [supported]: No separate onAI Microsoft 365 library index is claimed. Retrieved content is retained in the asking user’s chat; the precise chat-storage country is separately unverified. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026. Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026, onai:review-plan-m365-display-20261026 ### KNOW-06: Grounding and retrieval quality Judgment rule: Run the shared question set over the fixture corpus: factual lookups, cross-document questions, German document with an English question, a question with no answer in the corpus. Record citation presence, link accuracy, correct answers and refusals to invent. Disclose model, settings, attempt count and failures. Single runs support a case study, not a ranking. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial File-search citations are documented; retrieval accuracy remains unmeasured. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - citation_accuracy: Do the cited passages support the answer? The shared multilingual factual/cross-document/no-answer question set was not run. Citation correctness, cross-language success, no-answer reliability and observed accuracy remain unknown. - cross_language: Does a question in one language find documents in another? The shared multilingual factual/cross-document/no-answer question set was not run. Citation correctness, cross-language success, no-answer reliability and observed accuracy remain unknown. - no_answer_behaviour: Does it say when the corpus has no answer? The shared multilingual factual/cross-document/no-answer question set was not run. Citation correctness, cross-language success, no-answer reliability and observed accuracy remain unknown. - observed_accuracy: How many of the question set were answered correctly? The shared multilingual factual/cross-document/no-answer question set was not run. Citation correctness, cross-language success, no-answer reliability and observed accuracy remain unknown. - citations — Are answers linked to specific sources? [supported]: RAG/File Search provides retrieved source references and citation controls. Sources: librechat:librechat:rag, librechat:librechat:access. - citation_accuracy — Do the cited passages support the answer? [unknown]: citation_accuracy: Do the cited passages support the answer? The shared multilingual factual/cross-document/no-answer question set was not run. Citation correctness, cross-language success, no-answer reliability and observed accuracy remain unknown. - cross_language — Does a question in one language find documents in another? [unknown]: cross_language: Does a question in one language find documents in another? The shared multilingual factual/cross-document/no-answer question set was not run. Citation correctness, cross-language success, no-answer reliability and observed accuracy remain unknown. - no_answer_behaviour — Does it say when the corpus has no answer? [unknown]: no_answer_behaviour: Does it say when the corpus has no answer? The shared multilingual factual/cross-document/no-answer question set was not run. Citation correctness, cross-language success, no-answer reliability and observed accuracy remain unknown. - observed_accuracy — How many of the question set were answered correctly? [unknown]: observed_accuracy: How many of the question set were answered correctly? The shared multilingual factual/cross-document/no-answer question set was not run. Citation correctness, cross-language success, no-answer reliability and observed accuracy remain unknown. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:rag, librechat:librechat:access #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial For Per seat and Flat price Microsoft 365 answers, the vendor describes numbered source citations. Grounding accuracy, abstention and cross-language retrieval remain unknown without the shared fixture. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat; Flat price includes everything in Per seat. Microsoft 365 connector consent and source-account access required.; add_ons=Required Microsoft delegated consent and customer source-account access; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Customer Microsoft tenant; receiving model region depends on configuration; os=not specified. Limitations: - This record covers Microsoft 365 source citations on the two named public offers. No observed accuracy, link verification, abstention or cross-language retrieval result is claimed. - citations — Are answers linked to specific sources? [supported]: For Microsoft 365 answers included in Per seat and inherited by Flat price, the vendor describes numbered links to the original email, file or chat. The illustrated conversations are examples; citation accuracy was not observed. Sources: onai:review-plan-m365-display-20261026, onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026. - citation_accuracy — Do the cited passages support the answer? [unknown]: No fixture or real source-linked answer was checked for passage support or link accuracy. - cross_language — Does a question in one language find documents in another? [unknown]: The DE/FR/EN question set was not run against a connected corpus; interface translation does not establish cross-language retrieval quality. - no_answer_behaviour — Does it say when the corpus has no answer? [unknown]: No no-answer corpus fixture was run; the public example does not establish reliable abstention. - observed_accuracy — How many of the question set were answered correctly? [unknown]: No observed question-set numerator, denominator, model/settings or repeat count is available. No accuracy percentage is invented. Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026, onai:review-plan-m365-display-20261026 ### KNOW-07: Memory and personal context Judgment rule: Record personal custom instructions, cross-chat memory, project or workspace context, and user controls to view, edit, delete or disable memory. Record whether admins can disable memory organisation-wide. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: supported Opt-in user memory stores editable key/value context across chats; Projects and Agents provide additional persistent instructions. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. - custom_instructions — Can users set persistent instructions? [supported]: Projects retain instructions across their chats; Agents retain system instructions. Sources: librechat:librechat:projects, librechat:librechat:agents. - cross_chat_memory — Does the product remember facts across chats? [supported]: User Memory injects configured key/value entries across chats and is not semantic search over all past conversations. Sources: librechat:librechat:memory. - user_memory_controls — Can users view, edit and delete memories? [supported]: Users add/edit/remove entries and can toggle memory when permitted. Sources: librechat:librechat:memory. - admin_memory_controls — Can admins turn memory off? [supported]: Memory is disabled until configured and its feature permissions can be restricted by role. Sources: librechat:librechat:memory, librechat:librechat:access. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:projects, librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:memory, librechat:librechat:access #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Personal instructions that apply across all chats. ## Assistants and agents ### AGT-01: Custom assistants Judgment rule: Record creation of assistants with instructions, model, knowledge and tools; who can create; sharing scope; versioning; and an internal catalogue or directory. Build one HR policy assistant on the fixture and share it with one group. Prompt templates and a prompt library are recorded here. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: supported Agents combine instructions, a model, knowledge and tools, with version history and a permissioned internal catalog. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. - create_assistants — Can users create assistants with instructions, knowledge and tools? [supported]: The Agent Builder creates reusable instructions/model/files/tools/skills configurations. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents. - creator_permissions — Can admins limit who creates them? [supported]: AGENTS CREATE and sharing permissions can be restricted by role; resource grants control access. Sources: librechat:librechat:access. - sharing_scope — Can assistants be shared with users, groups or everyone? [supported]: Agent ACLs support users, groups, roles and all authenticated users when public sharing is permitted. Sources: librechat:librechat:access. - catalogue — Is there an internal assistant directory? [supported]: Agents have a marketplace/catalog and searchable builder tool library. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents. - prompt_library — Are shared prompt templates available? [supported]: Prompt resources have use/create/share/share-public permissions and ACLs. Sources: librechat:librechat:access. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:access #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Create your own assistants with instructions and knowledge and share them with your team. ### AGT-02: Tools, actions and MCP Judgment rule: Record built-in tools, custom actions (OpenAPI), MCP client support (local and remote servers), authentication model per tool (shared service account or per-user OAuth), and admin approval of tools. Verify one external-tool call and its access boundary. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Agent tools include file search, code, web and Actions, with local/remote MCP and configurable approval boundaries. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=Customer-operated or third-party MCP servers, Optional separate Code Interpreter service; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - tool_approval: Agent/code environments document approval modes and individual tool-call approvals. The default policy and every external side-effect boundary were not exercised. - builtin_tools — Which tools are built in? [supported]: Agent capabilities include file search/context, web search, memory and optionally configured code execution/image tools. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:images. - custom_actions — Can admins add API actions? [supported]: Agents support custom API Actions configured in the tool library. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents. - mcp_client — Can it use remote MCP servers, and with what admin control? [supported]: Configured MCP transports include stdio, SSE and Streamable HTTP; YAML and permissioned UI setup are documented. Sources: librechat:librechat:mcp, librechat:librechat:mcpcfg. - tool_auth — Do tools act as the user or as a shared account? [supported]: MCP supports configured credentials/headers and OAuth; credential and resource ownership scope depends on each server configuration. Sources: librechat:librechat:mcp, librechat:librechat:mcpcfg. - tool_approval — Can admins approve or block tools, and can users confirm actions before they run? [partial]: Agent/code environments document approval modes and individual tool-call approvals. The default policy and every external side-effect boundary were not exercised. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:code. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:images, librechat:librechat:mcp, librechat:librechat:mcpcfg, librechat:librechat:code #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Tools and your own API actions (OpenAPI); MCP not yet. ### AGT-03: Web search and deep research Judgment rule: Record web search on/off control per organisation and group, search provider, citation of web sources, deep or multi-step research, and whether queries leave the residency boundary. Admins of regulated companies often need web search off. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Web search combines configured search, scraping and optional reranking services; source queries can leave the installation boundary. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - deep_research: Agents can perform repeated tool operations and web research. No dedicated report fixture, quality result or preset research SLA was verified. - web_search — Is web search available? [supported]: Tool-capable chats/Agents can use the configured web search capability. Sources: librechat:librechat:web, librechat:librechat:agents. - admin_toggle — Can admins disable it per organisation or group? [supported]: WEB_SEARCH feature permissions control use; operators configure whether its provider stack is available. Sources: librechat:librechat:access, librechat:librechat:web. - search_provider — Which search provider handles queries, and where? [supported]: Documented choices include Serper, SearXNG, Tavily and Keenable, with Firecrawl/Tavily/Keenable scraping and optional Jina/Cohere reranking. Geography depends on the chosen services. Sources: librechat:librechat:web. - deep_research — Is multi-step research with a report available? [partial]: Agents can perform repeated tool operations and web research. No dedicated report fixture, quality result or preset research SLA was verified. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:web. - web_citations — Are web sources cited? [supported]: The web-search guide documents source references/citations from search and fetched content. Sources: librechat:librechat:web. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:web, librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:access #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Web search with cited sources; admins grant it to groups. ### AGT-04: Workflows and automation Judgment rule: Record no-code or low-code workflows, scheduled prompts, triggers from email, forms or business systems, and multi-step chains. Name where they run and who can build them. A shared prompt template is not a workflow. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Experimental Scheduled Chats run saved Agents on cron schedules; beta Agent Events can receive external deliveries. Availability: beta Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=Experimental schedules explicitly enabled, Beta Agents API for external Agent Events; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - workflow_builder: Agent Builder supports tool workflows and subagent configurations; no general business no-code flow editor was established. - event_triggers: The beta Agents API includes authenticated Agent Events. A built-in email/form trigger catalog was not verified. - workflow_builder — Is there a workflow or chain builder? [partial]: Agent Builder supports tool workflows and subagent configurations; no general business no-code flow editor was established. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents. - scheduled_tasks — Can prompts or assistants run on a schedule? [supported]: Scheduled Chats supports hourly/daily/weekly/custom cron with time zones, owner scope and execution checks; it is experimental and off by default. Sources: librechat:librechat:schedule. - event_triggers — Can external events start a workflow? [partial]: The beta Agents API includes authenticated Agent Events. A built-in email/form trigger catalog was not verified. Sources: librechat:librechat:api. - builder_audience — Is building aimed at business users, IT or developers? [supported]: Agent Builder is a user UI; API-event and runtime configuration require technical deployment work. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:schedule, librechat:librechat:api. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:schedule, librechat:librechat:api #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The public site labels the native workflow engine coming soon and offers n8n/custom workflow services meanwhile. Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-23): We build workflows and automations as a service; a self-service builder is in progress. Availability: unknown Delivery: official-integration Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Undated public homepage checked 2026-10-26; no native workflow release verified.; plan=Public n8n/custom-workflow service offer on request; plan entitlement unspecified. Native workflow engine described as coming soon.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Workflow deployment and processing regions are not specified in the cited public homepage section.; os=not specified. Limitations: - workflow_builder: The native engine is announced as coming soon, without a release date. The current offer describes n8n integration run by onAI, the customer or a partner; no native self-service chain builder is counted as released. - scheduled_tasks: No user-facing scheduled-prompt service, schedule limits or plan entitlement was verified. Internal background task machinery is insufficient evidence. Search on 2026-10-26: https://onaihq.com/, https://onaihq.com/sitemap.xml, https://onaihq.com/docs/. No additional scoped evidence established this answer. - event_triggers: No documented email/form/business-system trigger or executed workflow was obtained; outbound webhooks do not establish inbound workflow triggers. Search on 2026-10-26: https://onaihq.com/, https://onaihq.com/sitemap.xml, https://onaihq.com/docs/. No additional scoped evidence established this answer. - builder_audience: For the described n8n alternative, onAI, the customer or a partner may operate it, and onAI offers workflow construction on request. This does not specify a shipped native builder audience, schedule limits or event-trigger coverage. - The public homepage is undated and combines a future native engine with an on-request service alternative. No public deployment/version or Per seat/Flat price workflow entitlement was established. - workflow_builder — Is there a workflow or chain builder? [partial]: The native engine is announced as coming soon, without a release date. The current offer describes n8n integration run by onAI, the customer or a partner; no native self-service chain builder is counted as released. Sources: onai:onai:review-fix-public-workflow-scope-20261026. - scheduled_tasks — Can prompts or assistants run on a schedule? [unknown]: No user-facing scheduled-prompt service, schedule limits or plan entitlement was verified. Internal background task machinery is insufficient evidence. Search on 2026-10-26: https://onaihq.com/, https://onaihq.com/sitemap.xml, https://onaihq.com/docs/. No additional scoped evidence established this answer. - event_triggers — Can external events start a workflow? [unknown]: No documented email/form/business-system trigger or executed workflow was obtained; outbound webhooks do not establish inbound workflow triggers. Search on 2026-10-26: https://onaihq.com/, https://onaihq.com/sitemap.xml, https://onaihq.com/docs/. No additional scoped evidence established this answer. - builder_audience — Is building aimed at business users, IT or developers? [partial]: For the described n8n alternative, onAI, the customer or a partner may operate it, and onAI offers workflow construction on request. This does not specify a shipped native builder audience, schedule limits or event-trigger coverage. Sources: onai:onai:review-fix-public-workflow-scope-20261026. Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:onai:review-fix-public-workflow-scope-20261026 ### AGT-05: Agentic task execution Judgment rule: Record an agent mode that plans and carries out multi-step tasks with tools (browser, files, connectors), with visible steps, user confirmation of side effects and stop control. Run one fixture task (gather three documents, draft a summary, propose an email). Record interventions and what ran. A final claim of success is not proof. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Agent runs expose reasoning/tool activity and optional approval, interruption and cooperative stop controls. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - No gather-documents, draft-summary and propose-email task was run. - Highly experimental attached workspaces are distinct from ordinary Agent tool use. - agent_mode — Is there an agent mode for multi-step tasks? [supported]: Agents execute multi-step tool workflows; code/workspace capabilities require a compatible separately deployed service. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:code. - visible_steps — Are steps and tool calls shown? [supported]: Activity groups and tool cards distinguish preparation, execution, completion, cancellation and failure. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents. - side_effect_confirmation — Must the user confirm actions with side effects? [partial]: Attached environments can expose Ask before changes/Accept edits/Full access, bounded by operator tool rules. This is configurable, not a guarantee that all side effects require confirmation. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:code. - stop_control — Can the user stop a running task? [partial]: The release documents interruption/steering; ordinary background-tool cancellation is optional and cooperative, so an uncooperative tool may still finish. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:releases. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:code, librechat:librechat:releases #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. No separate autonomous agent mode; tools run in the normal chat. ### AGT-06: Programmable access Judgment rule: Record a public API for chat, assistants and knowledge, SDKs, API authentication, rate limits and whether API use counts against the same governance (audit, budgets, model restrictions). Being an MCP client is different from exposing the product over MCP. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The beta Agents API provides inference, Agent management and authenticated events; deployment guards and limitations are explicit. Availability: beta Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - knowledge_api: The beta management surface includes Agent/Skill management. A complete public knowledge-ingestion contract and fixture were not verified. - api_governance: Agent access and remote-agent permissions gate APIs, with source identity bound for events. Complete logging/budget/model parity across routes was not tested. - mcp_server: Does the product expose itself to other agents over MCP? A native product-wide MCP server was not established; being an MCP client does not establish that interface. - chat_api — Is there an API for chat and assistants? [supported]: Chat Completions and Open Responses interfaces expose saved Agents, with API-key or configured OIDC authentication. Sources: librechat:librechat:api. - knowledge_api — Can documents be loaded through an API? [partial]: The beta management surface includes Agent/Skill management. A complete public knowledge-ingestion contract and fixture were not verified. Sources: librechat:librechat:api. - api_governance — Do audit, budgets and model rules apply to API use? [partial]: Agent access and remote-agent permissions gate APIs, with source identity bound for events. Complete logging/budget/model parity across routes was not tested. Sources: librechat:librechat:api, librechat:librechat:access. - mcp_server — Does the product expose itself to other agents over MCP? [unknown]: mcp_server: Does the product expose itself to other agents over MCP? A native product-wide MCP server was not established; being an MCP client does not establish that interface. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:api, librechat:librechat:access #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. API for chat and document processing on request. ## Daily work ### WORK-01: Clients and access points Judgment rule: List web, desktop (Windows, macOS), iOS, Android, mobile browser and browser extension separately. For each, record login with company SSO, feature gaps against web, and MDM/Intune deployability. An installable app is different from a mobile website. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The main deployment is a responsive browser client. Native clients, MDM and a supported sidebar extension were not verified. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - desktop_apps: Windows and macOS apps? The self-host installation and client docs did not establish native Windows/macOS apps, a first-party browser extension or Intune/MDM configuration. - mobile_apps: Docs describe mobile navigation and temporary-chat controls in the web UI. No native iOS/Android client with company SSO was established. - browser_extension: Is there a browser extension or sidebar? The self-host installation and client docs did not establish native Windows/macOS apps, a first-party browser extension or Intune/MDM configuration. - managed_deployment: Can IT deploy and configure clients through MDM? The self-host installation and client docs did not establish native Windows/macOS apps, a first-party browser extension or Intune/MDM configuration. - client_feature_gaps: Desktop/mobile layouts expose different navigation controls; no comprehensive parity matrix was tested. - web — Is a full web client available? [supported]: A Docker/npm deployment serves a browser application at the configured server URL. Sources: librechat:librechat:firstchat, librechat:librechat:local. - desktop_apps — Windows and macOS apps? [unknown]: desktop_apps: Windows and macOS apps? The self-host installation and client docs did not establish native Windows/macOS apps, a first-party browser extension or Intune/MDM configuration. - mobile_apps — iOS and Android apps with SSO? [partial]: Docs describe mobile navigation and temporary-chat controls in the web UI. No native iOS/Android client with company SSO was established. Sources: librechat:librechat:retention, librechat:librechat:insights. - browser_extension — Is there a browser extension or sidebar? [unknown]: browser_extension: Is there a browser extension or sidebar? The self-host installation and client docs did not establish native Windows/macOS apps, a first-party browser extension or Intune/MDM configuration. - managed_deployment — Can IT deploy and configure clients through MDM? [unknown]: managed_deployment: Can IT deploy and configure clients through MDM? The self-host installation and client docs did not establish native Windows/macOS apps, a first-party browser extension or Intune/MDM configuration. - client_feature_gaps — Which features are missing on mobile? [partial]: Desktop/mobile layouts expose different navigation controls; no comprehensive parity matrix was tested. Sources: librechat:librechat:retention, librechat:librechat:insights. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:firstchat, librechat:librechat:local, librechat:librechat:retention, librechat:librechat:insights #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The vendor offers a browser workspace requiring no installation. Native clients, extensions and managed deployment support remain unknown. Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-22): An uncluttered interface without technical settings. At Manor, hundreds of employees use onAI every day. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat and Flat price web workspace offers; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Unspecified by source; os=Browser; operating system unspecified. Limitations: - Only browser access is established by public copy. No native-client absence is inferred from missing listings. - web — Is a full web client available? [supported]: The public AI Tools section describes the employee workspace running in a current browser with nothing to install. Sources: onai:public-web-client. - desktop_apps — Windows and macOS apps? [unknown]: No first-party Windows/macOS native client download, company-SSO support table or desktop fixture was located. - mobile_apps — iOS and Android apps with SSO? [unknown]: No iOS/Android native app listing or mobile SSO fixture was verified. A responsive website would not establish native apps. - browser_extension — Is there a browser extension or sidebar? [unknown]: No browser extension/sidebar release or installation instructions were located on the public product page or sitemap. - managed_deployment — Can IT deploy and configure clients through MDM? [unknown]: No MDM/Intune deployment package, policy guide or client configuration profile was obtained. - client_feature_gaps — Which features are missing on mobile? [unknown]: No matched desktop/mobile-browser/native-client fixture was run; no cross-client feature parity claim is made. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-web-client ### WORK-02: Office suite and Teams integration Judgment rule: Record presence inside Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook and Teams (and Google Docs, Gmail), with what the assistant can do in each: read the open document, write into it, act on mail. Record extra licences and admin consent needed. A connector that searches Office files is KNOW-03, not WORK-02. #### LibreChat Verification status: No public information found (not-published) Support: not-published We found no public information on this. A missing finding is not evidence that the product lacks the capability. #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Outlook and Excel add-ins in preparation; Microsoft 365 is connected live. ### WORK-03: Translation and writing Judgment rule: Record document translation preserving layout, the translation engine (LLM or dedicated such as DeepL), glossaries, formality control, supported languages including Swiss German conventions (no ß), and rewriting/proofreading tools. Translate the shared German contract into French and Italian and record layout and glossary results. #### LibreChat Verification status: No public information found (not-published) Support: not-published We found no public information on this. A missing finding is not evidence that the product lacks the capability. #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source. Translation with DeepL: documents with their layout, glossaries, formal or informal address. Plus adjusting style and tone. ### WORK-04: Image generation and editing Judgment rule: Record available image models, editing (inpainting, reference images), admin control and per-image cost visibility, and licence or usage terms for generated images. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Configured Agent image tools generate and edit images; model service rights/costs remain separate. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - admin_control: Operators control tool credentials/configuration and Agent creation/access permissions. A dedicated per-group image-spend switch was not established. - usage_terms: What usage rights apply to output? Generated-output rights and complete per-image cost visibility were not established as a LibreChat software entitlement. - image_generation — Can users generate images, with which models? [supported]: OpenAI Image Tools and additional documented provider tools attach to an Agent; the current guide defaults OpenAI tools to gpt-image-2.5-flare. Sources: librechat:librechat:images. - image_editing — Can users edit uploaded images? [supported]: The image guide documents editing/remixing uploaded images using image IDs and compatible tools. Sources: librechat:librechat:images. - admin_control — Can admins restrict image generation? [partial]: Operators control tool credentials/configuration and Agent creation/access permissions. A dedicated per-group image-spend switch was not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:images, librechat:librechat:access. - usage_terms — What usage rights apply to output? [unknown]: usage_terms: What usage rights apply to output? Generated-output rights and complete per-image cost visibility were not established as a LibreChat software entitlement. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:images, librechat:librechat:access #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Image Studio advertises several image models, prompt-based editing and administrator controls. Its cost examples and commercial-use statement are vendor claims. Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-22): The leading image models from OpenAI, Google, Black Forest Labs and xAI in one studio: one prompt to up to three models side by side, styles with automatic prompt enhancement, editing with up to ten reference images, cost shown before generating. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Image Studio listed in Per seat and Flat price; model entitlements unspecified; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Provider dependent; EU-only optional tier described separately; os=not specified. Limitations: - Displayed prices and timings are illustrative UI examples, not a general price list or measured benchmark. No provider-specific output-rights contract was reviewed. - image_generation — Can users generate images, with which models? [supported]: The page lists GPT Image, Nano Banana Pro, Imagen 4 and FLUX.3, with up to three selected models per prompt and an estimated provider cost shown before generation. Exact version IDs and live plan entitlements were not tested. Sources: onai:public-images. - image_editing — Can users edit uploaded images? [supported]: The page describes editing an uploaded image or a previous result using a text instruction and shows image-editing models. Inpainting masks and per-model limits were not verified. Sources: onai:public-images. - admin_control — Can admins restrict image generation? [supported]: Administrators are said to choose image models and which users may use them; optional personal-data filtering is described. Sources: onai:public-images. - usage_terms — What usage rights apply to output? [partial]: The vendor says generated images may be used commercially. It does not supply model-specific output licences, indemnities or restrictions in this section. Sources: onai:public-image-rights. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-image-rights, onai:public-images ### WORK-05: Voice and meetings Judgment rule: Record dictation, read-aloud, live voice conversation, meeting transcription and summarisation, supported languages including Swiss German speech, and where audio is processed. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial LibreChat documents STT, TTS and a hands-free conversation mode that chains them. Real-time speech-to-speech behavior, meeting outcomes and Swiss German recognition remain unverified. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Current self-hosted LibreChat Speech Settings documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; no voice-latency or dialect fixture performed; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=Optional configured STT/TTS engines and provider credentials; self-hosted speech services need allowedAddresses; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected app infrastructure; audio processing depends on browser or configured external/self-hosted speech engines, with no universal region verified; os=not specified. Limitations: - Conversation mode is a chain of transcription, text generation and playback; real-time audio-to-audio behavior, interruption and latency were not verified. - Audio location depends on the chosen engine. No meeting or Swiss German fixture was run. - dictation — Can users dictate prompts? [supported]: Speech configuration provides STT for audio input. Sources: librechat:librechat:speech. - read_aloud — Can answers be read aloud? [supported]: Speech configuration provides TTS for model responses. Sources: librechat:librechat:speech. - voice_conversation — Is a live voice mode available? [partial]: speechTab.conversationMode chains STT and TTS for hands-free turns: autoSendText sends the transcript after a configured delay, and automaticPlayback reads a completed response. Microphone recording is initially started by the user. Real-time speech-to-speech, interruption behavior and end-to-end latency were not tested. Sources: librechat:librechat:speech-conversation-r2. - meeting_summaries — Are meetings transcribed and summarised? [unknown]: No meeting capture/integration, speaker diarization or meeting-summary fixture was verified in the reviewed speech documentation. - swiss_german_speech — Is Swiss German speech recognised? [unknown]: Swiss German recognition and transcript quality were not tested; a language setting does not establish dialect accuracy. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:speech, librechat:librechat:speech-conversation-r2 #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Voice input with transcription, and answers read aloud. ### WORK-06: Data analysis and document output Judgment rule: Record code execution for data analysis, charts, and generation of downloadable Word, Excel, PowerPoint and PDF files. Analyse the fixture Excel and request a PowerPoint summary. Record where code runs and whether files are editable. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The separate Code Interpreter runs analysis and produces downloadable files; artifacts provide code/HTML/diagram previews. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=Separately operated compatible Code Interpreter service, Experimental stateful workspaces only if explicitly configured; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - charts: Code execution and generated-file downloads support chart artifacts, but the shared spreadsheet/chart fixture was not run. - office_file_output: Generated files are downloadable; editable Word/Excel/PowerPoint fidelity was not established with a fixture. - canvas_editing: Artifacts render React/HTML/Mermaid content and source; a rich Office document editor was not established. - data_analysis — Can it analyse spreadsheets with executed code? [supported]: Configured Code Interpreter executes programs against uploaded files in its separate sandbox. Sources: librechat:librechat:code. - charts — Can it produce charts? [partial]: Code execution and generated-file downloads support chart artifacts, but the shared spreadsheet/chart fixture was not run. Sources: librechat:librechat:code. - office_file_output — Can it create Word, Excel or PowerPoint files? [partial]: Generated files are downloadable; editable Word/Excel/PowerPoint fidelity was not established with a fixture. Sources: librechat:librechat:code. - canvas_editing — Is there a document or canvas editor for iterating on output? [partial]: Artifacts render React/HTML/Mermaid content and source; a rich Office document editor was not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:artifacts. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:code, librechat:librechat:artifacts #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Code execution (Python) for data analysis and charts. ### WORK-07: Sharing and team spaces Judgment rule: Record chat sharing (link, user, group), shared projects or team spaces, channels or group chat with AI, and commenting. Test sharing a chat with a colleague in another group and record what the recipient sees, including knowledge they lack access to. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Shared chat links publish transcript snapshots and optional files. Projects are personal, and shared source permission boundaries need care. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - group_chat: Can several people chat together with the AI? Simultaneous multi-person AI group chat was not established from Projects and shareable-link documentation; link continuation creates a separate personal copy. - share_permission_boundary: Published file snapshots are served independently of the owner’s live file ACL. Sharing grants access to the published copy, not continuing source-system authorization; no restricted-source fixture was run. - share_chats — Can chats be shared inside the organisation? [supported]: Authenticated shared links are supported, with optional public viewing; public unauthenticated access is off by default. Sources: librechat:librechat:share. - team_spaces — Are shared projects or workspaces available? [unsupported]: Projects specifically cannot be shared or transferred and are personal to the creator. Shared Agents/resources are a separate capability. Sources: librechat:librechat:projects. - group_chat — Can several people chat together with the AI? [unknown]: group_chat: Can several people chat together with the AI? Simultaneous multi-person AI group chat was not established from Projects and shareable-link documentation; link continuation creates a separate personal copy. - share_permission_boundary — Does sharing respect the recipient's access to sources? [partial]: Published file snapshots are served independently of the owner’s live file ACL. Sharing grants access to the published copy, not continuing source-system authorization; no restricted-source fixture was run. Sources: librechat:librechat:share. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:share, librechat:librechat:projects #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Share chats with colleagues by link. ### WORK-08: Interface languages and accessibility Judgment rule: Record UI languages, focusing on German, French, Italian and English, with translation quality observed (complete, partial, machine-translated). Record response language handling and WCAG conformance statements. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial English, German, French and Italian UI resources are registered in the pinned client; quality and accessibility conformance were not evaluated. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - dach_language_quality: Are German, French and Italian UIs complete and natural? No complete DE/FR/IT walkthrough, German separate-admin-panel coverage test or WCAG conformance statement/report was verified. - accessibility_statement: Is there a WCAG conformance statement? No complete DE/FR/IT walkthrough, German separate-admin-panel coverage test or WCAG conformance statement/report was verified. - admin_ui_languages: Is the admin interface available in German? No complete DE/FR/IT walkthrough, German separate-admin-panel coverage test or WCAG conformance statement/report was verified. - ui_languages — Which UI languages are offered? [supported]: The client i18n implementation registers en, de, fr and it among community-maintained translations. Sources: librechat:librechat:i18n-pin. - dach_language_quality — Are German, French and Italian UIs complete and natural? [unknown]: dach_language_quality: Are German, French and Italian UIs complete and natural? No complete DE/FR/IT walkthrough, German separate-admin-panel coverage test or WCAG conformance statement/report was verified. - accessibility_statement — Is there a WCAG conformance statement? [unknown]: accessibility_statement: Is there a WCAG conformance statement? No complete DE/FR/IT walkthrough, German separate-admin-panel coverage test or WCAG conformance statement/report was verified. - admin_ui_languages — Is the admin interface available in German? [unknown]: admin_ui_languages: Is the admin interface available in German? No complete DE/FR/IT walkthrough, German separate-admin-panel coverage test or WCAG conformance statement/report was verified. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:i18n-pin #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Interface in German and English, more languages in preparation. ## Administration and governance ### ADM-01: Single sign-on and authentication Judgment rule: Record SAML, OIDC, Microsoft Entra ID, Google, LDAP, MFA enforcement, conditional-access compatibility, domain verification and plan restrictions. Test one SSO login on a trial where possible. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Self-hosted authentication supports OAuth/OIDC, SAML and LDAP; local/LDAP TOTP can be enforced. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - conditional_access: Entra authentication and token reuse are documented, but an actual conditional-access/device-policy login was not tested. - domain_capture: Can the company claim its email domain? Registration/domain filters were not established as a tenant-wide company-domain ownership claim. - sso_protocols — Which SSO protocols and identity providers work? [supported]: OIDC/OAuth providers include Entra, Google, Keycloak and Auth0; SAML and LDAP are documented separately. Sources: librechat:librechat:openid, librechat:librechat:saml, librechat:librechat:auth. - sso_plan — Which plan includes SSO? [supported]: The authentication configuration belongs to the MIT self-hosted project, with no separate SSO licence tariff. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:auth. - mfa — Can MFA be enforced? [supported]: ENFORCE_TWO_FACTOR_AUTHENTICATION requires local/LDAP enrollment and prevents disabling it; federated accounts depend on IdP MFA. Sources: librechat:librechat:auth. - conditional_access — Do Entra conditional-access policies apply? [partial]: Entra authentication and token reuse are documented, but an actual conditional-access/device-policy login was not tested. Sources: librechat:librechat:entra. - domain_capture — Can the company claim its email domain? [unknown]: domain_capture: Can the company claim its email domain? Registration/domain filters were not established as a tenant-wide company-domain ownership claim. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:openid, librechat:librechat:saml, librechat:librechat:auth, librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:entra #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Public copy offers Microsoft, Google, OIDC and LDAP sign-in, with published plan differences. Native SAML, MFA enforcement and conditional-access behavior were not verified. Availability: unknown Delivery: official-integration Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat: Microsoft/Google; Flat price: Microsoft/Google/OIDC/LDAP; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Identity-provider and deployment regions unspecified; os=not specified. Limitations: - No successful login or policy enforcement fixture was run. SAML and MFA are left unknown rather than inferred from corporate-login marketing. - sso_protocols — Which SSO protocols and identity providers work? [supported]: The current page lists Microsoft Entra ID, Google, any OpenID Connect provider and LDAP. It does not establish native SAML support; generic corporate SSO language is insufficient. Sources: onai:public-pricing-display-20261026. - sso_plan — Which plan includes SSO? [supported]: Per seat lists Entra ID and Google. Flat price lists Entra ID, Google, OIDC and LDAP. These are published offer terms, not an executed SSO fixture. Sources: onai:public-pricing-display-20261026. - mfa — Can MFA be enforced? [unknown]: No onAI-native MFA requirement or tenant-enforced IdP-MFA setup was verified. IdP capabilities are not automatically onAI enforcement. - conditional_access — Do Entra conditional-access policies apply? [unknown]: No Entra conditional-access compatibility statement or test policy/login result was obtained. - domain_capture — Can the company claim its email domain? [unknown]: No domain-claim/verification workflow, automatic capture policy or ownership-transfer fixture was established from public material. Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-pricing-display-20261026 ### ADM-02: User provisioning and lifecycle Judgment rule: Record SCIM, just-in-time provisioning, group sync from the identity provider, deprovisioning effects (chats, assistants, knowledge ownership transfer) and licence assignment. Deprovision a test user and record what happens to their content. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Entra group synchronization and federated account creation are documented; SCIM and leaver content transfer remain unknown. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - scim: Is SCIM provisioning supported? SCIM was not established in the authentication/access docs or pinned repository path review. No two-user deprovisioning fixture was run. - deprovisioning: The docs provide user deletion scripts, but content ownership transfer and revocation behavior were not fixture-tested. - seat_assignment: Operators manage accounts/roles under an MIT licence; there is no per-seat licence entitlement in the scoped source. - scim — Is SCIM provisioning supported? [unknown]: scim: Is SCIM provisioning supported? SCIM was not established in the authentication/access docs or pinned repository path review. No two-user deprovisioning fixture was run. - group_sync — Are identity-provider groups synced? [supported]: With Entra OIDC token reuse, Graph groups sync at login; resource ACL principal membership has a documented cache. Sources: librechat:librechat:access, librechat:librechat:entra. - jit_provisioning — Are users created at first login? [supported]: Federated login creates accounts according to the authentication configuration; OpenID/SAML registration cannot be independently disabled. Sources: librechat:librechat:auth. - deprovisioning — What happens to a removed user's data and shared assets? [partial]: The docs provide user deletion scripts, but content ownership transfer and revocation behavior were not fixture-tested. Sources: librechat:librechat:auth. - seat_assignment — Can admins assign and reclaim seats? [partial]: Operators manage accounts/roles under an MIT licence; there is no per-seat licence entitlement in the scoped source. Sources: librechat:librechat:auth, librechat:librechat:license. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:access, librechat:librechat:entra, librechat:librechat:auth, librechat:librechat:license #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Users are created automatically at their first SSO sign-in and groups come from the directory; no SCIM. ### ADM-03: Roles, groups and feature permissions Judgment rule: Record admin roles, delegated admins, groups, per-feature permissions (web search, image generation, connectors, file upload, agents), separation of subsidiaries or departments, and enforcement. Test one disabled feature for one group. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Role permissions, resource ACLs and system grants support granular governance; the separate management UI remains preview. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server, Separately deployed LibreChat Admin Panel preview; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=Separate Admin Panel preview for GUI management; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - Separate admin management UI is preview; the core authorization model is documented as available. - No two-group disabled-feature fixture was run. - admin_roles — Which admin roles exist, and can admin rights be delegated? [supported]: ADMIN/USER and custom roles exist; capability grants can delegate selected administrative functions without full admin. Sources: librechat:librechat:access. - groups — Can permissions be set per group? [supported]: Local and Entra groups can receive ACLs, system grants and configuration overrides. Sources: librechat:librechat:access, librechat:librechat:admin. - feature_toggles — Which features can be switched on or off per group? [supported]: Permissions include Agents, MCP, prompts, memory, search, file search/citations and code execution. Sources: librechat:librechat:access. - multi_entity — Can subsidiaries or departments be separated within one contract? [partial]: Tenant-scoped API queries and group/configuration boundaries are documented. A commercial multi-entity contract and tested tenant isolation were not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:insights, librechat:librechat:access. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:access, librechat:librechat:admin, librechat:librechat:insights #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source. Roles and groups; admins decide per group which features (for example Image Studio, translator, web search) are used. ### ADM-04: Usage and adoption analytics Judgment rule: Record dashboards for active users, usage by feature, model, group and assistant, export, and privacy controls (aggregation, pseudonymisation, works-council-friendly settings). Distinguish aggregate adoption metrics from per-person monitoring. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Optional Insights reports identifiable activity; token transactions and optional tracing are separate sources of usage detail. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - breakdowns: Insights supports Agent filtering and user activity; recorded token/context cost details are per model/endpoint. Complete group/feature/assistant exports were not established. - export: Can usage data be exported? A documented complete admin analytics export and group/cost-centre dataset were not verified. - privacy_modes: Insights is off unless enabled and is capability-gated; it can display names, emails and first-message content. Pseudonymized reporting was not established. - adoption_dashboard — Is there an adoption dashboard? [supported]: Opt-in Insights reports conversations, unique users, messages, tokens, top users and recent conversations. Sources: librechat:librechat:insights. - breakdowns — Can usage be broken down by group, model, feature and assistant? [partial]: Insights supports Agent filtering and user activity; recorded token/context cost details are per model/endpoint. Complete group/feature/assistant exports were not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:insights, librechat:librechat:tokens. - export — Can usage data be exported? [unknown]: export: Can usage data be exported? A documented complete admin analytics export and group/cost-centre dataset were not verified. - privacy_modes — Can per-person reporting be limited or pseudonymised? [partial]: Insights is off unless enabled and is capability-gated; it can display names, emails and first-message content. Pseudonymized reporting was not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:insights. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:insights, librechat:librechat:tokens #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Usage reports by model, feature and person. ### ADM-05: Spend controls and cost allocation Judgment rule: Record cost visibility per user, group and cost centre, budgets and their behaviour (alert, block, downgrade model), pooled credits, and chargeback exports. Test a small budget on a trial where possible. Distinguish billed amounts, estimates and unavailable amounts. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Optional token-credit balances block admission when insufficient; credit estimates differ from actual cloud invoices. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - cost_visibility: Token transactions and configured token prices support per-user/model estimates. Insights explicitly reports activity rather than monetary billing. - budgets: Optional per-user start balances and automatic refills are documented. Group/cost-centre pooled budgets were not established. - chargeback: Can costs be exported per cost centre? Cost-centre chargeback exports and reconciliation to actual vendor invoices were not established. - cost_visibility — Can admins see cost or consumption per user and group? [partial]: Token transactions and configured token prices support per-user/model estimates. Insights explicitly reports activity rather than monetary billing. Sources: librechat:librechat:tokens, librechat:librechat:insights. - budgets — Can budgets be set per user or group? [partial]: Optional per-user start balances and automatic refills are documented. Group/cost-centre pooled budgets were not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:balance. - budget_enforcement — Does reaching a budget alert, block or downgrade? [supported]: Pinned balance middleware reserves estimated token cost and throws an error if credits cannot be reserved; no low-budget trial was run. Sources: librechat:librechat:balance-pin. - chargeback — Can costs be exported per cost centre? [unknown]: chargeback: Can costs be exported per cost centre? Cost-centre chargeback exports and reconciliation to actual vendor invoices were not established. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:tokens, librechat:librechat:insights, librechat:librechat:balance, librechat:librechat:balance-pin #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Cost limits per organisation and per person. ### ADM-06: Audit logs and compliance export Judgment rule: Record which events are logged (logins, admin changes, prompts, responses, file access, connector queries), retention, export or SIEM streaming, and eDiscovery/legal hold. Use the word audit only with a defined retention and integrity model. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Operational logs and persisted chats are available; a complete audit retention/integrity or eDiscovery system was not verified. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - admin_events: Backend logs capture errors/debug activity and can include operational/security actions. A complete immutable admin-event schema was not established. - content_logging: Chats are persisted in MongoDB subject to retention settings; external tracing is optional. This is not a verified compliance archive. - siem_export: Operators can feed log files to external systems such as ELK. A native managed SIEM stream and integrity guarantee were not verified. - ediscovery: Are eDiscovery and legal hold supported? No eDiscovery/legal hold, tamper-evident archive or complete prompt/file/connector event coverage was verified. - log_retention: The logging guide describes 14-day rotation. Rotation is not evidence of an enforced legal retention or deletion guarantee across external sinks. - admin_events — Are admin and security events logged? [partial]: Backend logs capture errors/debug activity and can include operational/security actions. A complete immutable admin-event schema was not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:logging. - content_logging — Can prompts and answers be retained for compliance, and is it configurable? [partial]: Chats are persisted in MongoDB subject to retention settings; external tracing is optional. This is not a verified compliance archive. Sources: librechat:librechat:retention, librechat:librechat:compose-pin. - siem_export — Can logs stream to a SIEM or be exported? [partial]: Operators can feed log files to external systems such as ELK. A native managed SIEM stream and integrity guarantee were not verified. Sources: librechat:librechat:logging. - ediscovery — Are eDiscovery and legal hold supported? [unknown]: ediscovery: Are eDiscovery and legal hold supported? No eDiscovery/legal hold, tamper-evident archive or complete prompt/file/connector event coverage was verified. - log_retention — How long are logs kept? [partial]: The logging guide describes 14-day rotation. Rotation is not evidence of an enforced legal retention or deletion guarantee across external sinks. Sources: librechat:librechat:logging. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:logging, librechat:librechat:retention, librechat:librechat:compose-pin #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Audit logging can be switched on; a built-in SIEM connection is not included. ### ADM-07: Data loss prevention and personal data Judgment rule: Record detection and handling of personal and confidential data before it reaches a model: redaction, masking, blocking, warning. Record integration with Purview, Netskope or similar, and whether filtering runs locally or at a third party. Send a fixture prompt with a Swiss AHV number and IBAN and record the outcome. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Optional server-side content filters support configured pattern detection, blocking and auditing, plus narrowly scoped Agent text redaction. External DLP integration and fixture accuracy remain unknown. Availability: source-only Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Development source a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b; current Latest (dev) documentation; limited redaction announced in config v1.3.18 on 2026-10-22; plan=Customer-operated LibreChat; optional base-YAML content policies, disabled unless configured; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - Development-source finding; no running instance or AHV/IBAN fixture. - Filtering is opt-in and limited to configured sources/fields. Default patterns cover credential shapes, not every PII class. - Redaction applies only to eligible fresh Agent text; encrypted originals remain stored. - A dedicated external DLP integration remains unverified. - pii_detection — Is personal data detected in prompts and files? [partial]: Configured source-aware policies can inspect selected prompt fields and file names/extracted text/transcripts. Built-in starter rules match credentials; admins must supply additional personal-data patterns. Opaque files may be allowed by default or explicitly blocked. AHV/IBAN and confidential-file detection accuracy were not tested. Sources: librechat:librechat:r4-content-filter, librechat:librechat:r4-pii-runtime, librechat:librechat:r4-patterns, librechat:librechat:r4-private-submission, librechat:librechat:r4-filter-middleware. - pii_action — Is it redacted, masked, blocked or only warned? [partial]: Configured matches can block or audit. Redaction transforms only fresh, text-only interactive Agent submissions carrying clientRequestId and a valid CREDS_KEY; edits, resumes, files, quotes and other endpoints retain blocking checks. Original text is encrypted and unindexed, rather than discarded. No running deployment was tested. Sources: librechat:librechat:r4-content-filter, librechat:librechat:r4-pii-runtime, librechat:librechat:r4-patterns, librechat:librechat:r4-private-submission, librechat:librechat:r4-filter-middleware. - custom_patterns — Can admins add custom patterns or terms? [supported]: Operators can add labelled custom RE2JS regular expressions in base librechat.yaml, with optional categories. Database/role/group/user overrides cannot modify the policy; all replicas must load matching configuration. Invalid rules are rejected on configuration load. Sources: librechat:librechat:r4-content-filter, librechat:librechat:r4-patterns, librechat:librechat:r4-filter-middleware. - dlp_integration — Does it integrate with an existing DLP product? [unknown]: No first-party Purview/Netskope or other external DLP connector was established from the content-filter guide, current public repository tree and targeted official-site search. Configurable local patterns are not evidence of an external enterprise DLP integration. - filter_location — Where does filtering run? [supported]: Inspected content-filter middleware and rule evaluation run in the customer-operated LibreChat API backend. Optional extraction/OCR and inference providers remain separate data flows; no named deployment region or traffic path was tested. Sources: librechat:librechat:r4-pii-runtime, librechat:librechat:r4-filter-middleware. Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-25. Sources: librechat:librechat:r4-content-filter, librechat:librechat:r4-pii-runtime, librechat:librechat:r4-patterns, librechat:librechat:r4-private-submission, librechat:librechat:r4-filter-middleware, librechat:librechat:r4-config-1318 #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. For selected web search providers and image models, automatic redaction of sensitive text can be switched on. ### ADM-08: AI policy and guardrails Judgment rule: Record organisation-wide system instructions, acceptable-use notices and acknowledgement, content filters, topic restrictions, AI-output labelling, and admin visibility of policy violations. Separate enforced policy from instructions the model is expected to follow. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Operators can configure prompts and usage terms; abuse moderation is distinct from semantic content-policy enforcement. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - org_instructions: Enforced model-spec presets and Agent instructions can guide behavior; model-followed instructions are not guaranteed policy enforcement. - content_filters: Automated moderation scores rate/authentication/message abuse and can ban users. Semantic topic or PII policy coverage was not established. - violation_reporting: Abuse scoring is documented, but a complete organization content-policy violation dashboard and reporting fixture were not established. - org_instructions — Can admins set organisation-wide instructions? [partial]: Enforced model-spec presets and Agent instructions can guide behavior; model-followed instructions are not guaranteed policy enforcement. Sources: librechat:librechat:modelspec, librechat:librechat:agents. - usage_notice — Can users be required to accept a usage policy? [supported]: Interface configuration includes custom terms of service and acceptance settings. Sources: librechat:librechat:interface. - content_filters — Are content filters configurable? [partial]: Automated moderation scores rate/authentication/message abuse and can ban users. Semantic topic or PII policy coverage was not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:mod. - violation_reporting — Are policy hits visible to admins? [partial]: Abuse scoring is documented, but a complete organization content-policy violation dashboard and reporting fixture were not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:mod. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:modelspec, librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:interface, librechat:librechat:mod #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Administrators set notice banners and system instructions for the AI. ## Data protection and sovereignty ### DATA-01: Hosting location and data residency Judgment rule: Record country or region separately for chat storage, files and indexes, model inference, backups, logs and telemetry, and support access. Name the cloud provider. Record whether residency is default, a paid option or plan-dependent. "EU data boundary" programmes are recorded with their documented exceptions. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Customer operators choose storage and service locations; external model, OCR, search and code services need separate residency decisions. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - backups_logs_region: Logs and mounted data reside in the configured deployment; backup, telemetry and optional tracing geographies depend on operator choices and were not audited. - support_access_region: From where can vendor staff access data? No vendor or integrator support-access country restriction was reviewed for this customer-operated deployment. - swiss_hosting: A customer may run the software on Swiss infrastructure; no bundled Swiss managed inference/support commitment was established. - storage_region — Where are chats, files and indexes stored? [supported]: The reference self-hosted stack keeps application data in configured MongoDB/files and retrieval data in PGVector. Its country is chosen by the deployer. Sources: librechat:librechat:compose-pin, librechat:librechat:remote. - inference_region — Where do model calls run, per provider? [supported]: Customer-selected cloud endpoints/regions or local endpoints determine inference; hosting LibreChat in Switzerland does not place every external model there. Sources: librechat:librechat:custom, librechat:librechat:bedrock, librechat:librechat:vertex. - backups_logs_region — Where are backups, logs and telemetry? [partial]: Logs and mounted data reside in the configured deployment; backup, telemetry and optional tracing geographies depend on operator choices and were not audited. Sources: librechat:librechat:logging, librechat:librechat:compose-pin. - support_access_region — From where can vendor staff access data? [unknown]: support_access_region: From where can vendor staff access data? No vendor or integrator support-access country restriction was reviewed for this customer-operated deployment. - swiss_hosting — Is Swiss hosting available? [partial]: A customer may run the software on Swiss infrastructure; no bundled Swiss managed inference/support commitment was established. Sources: librechat:librechat:remote, librechat:librechat:license. - residency_plan — Which plan or option provides residency? [supported]: Customer-controlled placement is a self-hosted deployment property, not a separately priced residency licence. Sources: librechat:librechat:remote, librechat:librechat:license. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:compose-pin, librechat:librechat:remote, librechat:librechat:custom, librechat:librechat:bedrock, librechat:librechat:vertex, librechat:librechat:logging, librechat:librechat:license #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source. Swiss contracting party. onAI runs on servers in Europe. On request a dedicated server, or onAI runs on your own servers (on-premises). ### DATA-02: Deployment options Judgment rule: Record multi-tenant SaaS, dedicated single-tenant instance, deployment in the customer's cloud account, on-premise and air-gapped as separate options with plan and availability. Record which features are missing in each mode, who operates it, and the documented seat or contract threshold for each mode, which can differ from the enterprise plan threshold (e.g. dedicated SaaS from 2,000 seats, own cloud from 5,000). A local-network connector or gateway that reaches on-prem data from a vendor-hosted platform is KNOW-03, not on-premise deployment. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The project documents local and customer-cloud installs. A free public demo is separate from a production managed service. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server, LibreChat public evaluation demo; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - multi_tenant_saas: The project operates a free public evaluation Demo, not a reviewed production business SaaS offer. Its terms permit data cleanups and disclaim persistence. - dedicated_instance: Is a dedicated single-tenant instance offered, from what size? A vendor-operated dedicated production service and its contractual size floor were not established. - air_gapped: Local chat/embedding routes exist, but a complete disconnected installation and its full dependency behavior were not verified. - mode_feature_gaps: External APIs, OCR/search services and separate code runtimes need their own availability/networking; there is no verified SaaS/on-prem feature-parity matrix. - multi_tenant_saas — Is a shared SaaS offered? [partial]: The project operates a free public evaluation Demo, not a reviewed production business SaaS offer. Its terms permit data cleanups and disclaim persistence. Sources: librechat:librechat:demo, librechat:librechat:firstchat. - dedicated_instance — Is a dedicated single-tenant instance offered, from what size? [unknown]: dedicated_instance: Is a dedicated single-tenant instance offered, from what size? A vendor-operated dedicated production service and its contractual size floor were not established. - customer_cloud — Can it run in the customer's own cloud account, from what size? [supported]: Remote hosting documentation describes customer-selected servers/cloud hosting without a software seat minimum. Sources: librechat:librechat:remote, librechat:librechat:license. - on_premise — Can the whole platform run on customer infrastructure, from what size? [supported]: Docker/npm installation can run the application and dependencies on customer infrastructure. Sources: librechat:librechat:local, librechat:librechat:compose-pin. - air_gapped — Can it run without internet access? [partial]: Local chat/embedding routes exist, but a complete disconnected installation and its full dependency behavior were not verified. Sources: librechat:librechat:custom, librechat:librechat:ragcfg. - mode_feature_gaps — Which features are missing outside SaaS? [partial]: External APIs, OCR/search services and separate code runtimes need their own availability/networking; there is no verified SaaS/on-prem feature-parity matrix. Sources: librechat:librechat:ocr, librechat:librechat:web, librechat:librechat:code. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:demo, librechat:librechat:firstchat, librechat:librechat:remote, librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:local, librechat:librechat:compose-pin, librechat:librechat:custom, librechat:librechat:ragcfg, librechat:librechat:ocr, librechat:librechat:web, librechat:librechat:code #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source. Swiss contracting party. onAI runs on servers in Europe. On request a dedicated server, or onAI runs on your own servers (on-premises). ### DATA-03: Training use and provider retention Judgment rule: Record whether customer content trains vendor or provider models, by plan and default; zero-data-retention arrangements with model providers; abuse-monitoring retention and human review; and the model provider's terms that apply. A "no training" claim on a marketing page is `vendor-claimed` until the contract or DPA says so. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The customer configures model contracts and data paths; a universal no-training or provider-retention promise was not established. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - vendor_training: The self-hosted application stores data in the customer’s configured stack; this architecture is not a contractual promise covering every optional external service. - provider_training: Do model providers train on it under this product's contracts? No specific customer provider agreement, abuse retention/human-review period or zero-retention entitlement was reviewed. Website and Demo privacy policies do not govern arbitrary self-hosted providers. - provider_retention: How long do model providers keep prompts, including for abuse monitoring? No specific customer provider agreement, abuse retention/human-review period or zero-retention entitlement was reviewed. Website and Demo privacy policies do not govern arbitrary self-hosted providers. - zero_retention: Is zero data retention available, and on which plan? No specific customer provider agreement, abuse retention/human-review period or zero-retention entitlement was reviewed. Website and Demo privacy policies do not govern arbitrary self-hosted providers. - human_review: Can provider staff review content? No specific customer provider agreement, abuse retention/human-review period or zero-retention entitlement was reviewed. Website and Demo privacy policies do not govern arbitrary self-hosted providers. - vendor_training — Does the vendor train on customer content? [partial]: The self-hosted application stores data in the customer’s configured stack; this architecture is not a contractual promise covering every optional external service. Sources: librechat:librechat:compose-pin, librechat:librechat:firstchat. - provider_training — Do model providers train on it under this product's contracts? [unknown]: provider_training: Do model providers train on it under this product's contracts? No specific customer provider agreement, abuse retention/human-review period or zero-retention entitlement was reviewed. Website and Demo privacy policies do not govern arbitrary self-hosted providers. - provider_retention — How long do model providers keep prompts, including for abuse monitoring? [unknown]: provider_retention: How long do model providers keep prompts, including for abuse monitoring? No specific customer provider agreement, abuse retention/human-review period or zero-retention entitlement was reviewed. Website and Demo privacy policies do not govern arbitrary self-hosted providers. - zero_retention — Is zero data retention available, and on which plan? [unknown]: zero_retention: Is zero data retention available, and on which plan? No specific customer provider agreement, abuse retention/human-review period or zero-retention entitlement was reviewed. Website and Demo privacy policies do not govern arbitrary self-hosted providers. - human_review — Can provider staff review content? [unknown]: human_review: Can provider staff review content? No specific customer provider agreement, abuse retention/human-review period or zero-retention entitlement was reviewed. Website and Demo privacy policies do not govern arbitrary self-hosted providers. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:compose-pin, librechat:librechat:firstchat #### onAI Verification status: Sourced (sourced) Support: partial The site publishes general no-training copy and advertises an optional provider zero-retention tier. Their contractual applicability to Per seat and Flat price is unverified; no plan-specific provider-retention or human-review guarantee is established. Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-23): Your data is not used to train AI models; we only use providers that exclude this by contract. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Product-wide marketing only; Per seat/Flat price contractual applicability and EU-only tier eligibility unverified.; add_ons=EU-only processing and zero-retention option, terms unspecified; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Per-provider default unknown; optional EU tier claimed; os=not specified. Limitations: - Remains public-candidate because the public statements are not mapped to a named plan contract. No no-training or zero-retention entitlement is inferred for either plan. - The existence of a requestable DPA is not review of its terms; provider retention and human review remain explicit gaps. - vendor_training — Does the vendor train on customer content? [partial]: The public product page makes a general no-training statement about prompts, files and answers. It is recorded only as unqualified marketing copy: no retrieved DPA or public plan mapping establishes the contractual rule for Per seat or Flat price. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps. - provider_training — Do model providers train on it under this product's contracts? [unknown]: No provider contract or Per seat/Flat price policy mapping was retrieved. General no-training marketing does not establish model-provider contract terms, exceptions or enforcement. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps. - provider_retention — How long do model providers keep prompts, including for abuse monitoring? [unknown]: No provider-by-provider prompt/abuse-monitoring retention period, default or exception schedule was obtained. - zero_retention — Is zero data retention available, and on which plan? [unknown]: The page advertises an optional EU-only AI-processing tier with provider zero retention, but its applicable base plan, providers, exceptions and contractual terms were not retrieved. This is not counted as an established Per seat or Flat price entitlement. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps. - human_review — Can provider staff review content? [unknown]: No product-specific provider human-review/abuse-monitoring policy or opt-out contract was retrieved. Checked 2026-10-21; not separately cross-checked; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps ### DATA-04: Retention and deletion Judgment rule: Record default retention for chats, files, indexes and logs; admin-configured retention; user deletion; deletion after contract end; and deletion confirmation. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Normal chats have no default expiry; temporary chats default to 30 days and admins can configure broader expiry modes. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - user_deletion: Users can delete conversations/data and retention sweeps remove files. Copies, backups and external provider deletion were not end-to-end verified. - contract_end_deletion: What is deleted at contract end, and when? No commercial contract-end purge/confirmation deadline was reviewed; the Demo’s retention terms are a separate offer. - default_retention — What is retained and for how long by default? [supported]: The default temporary retention is 720 hours; normal chats persist unless configured under all/ephemeral modes. Memories do not expire with chats. Sources: librechat:librechat:retention. - admin_retention — Can admins set retention periods? [supported]: Admins set all or ephemeral retention, regular/temporary deadlines and Agent file retention. New settings apply on later saves rather than rewriting every existing record immediately. Sources: librechat:librechat:retention. - user_deletion — Can users delete their chats and files permanently? [partial]: Users can delete conversations/data and retention sweeps remove files. Copies, backups and external provider deletion were not end-to-end verified. Sources: librechat:librechat:retention, librechat:librechat:settings. - contract_end_deletion — What is deleted at contract end, and when? [unknown]: contract_end_deletion: What is deleted at contract end, and when? No commercial contract-end purge/confirmation deadline was reviewed; the Demo’s retention terms are a separate offer. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:retention, librechat:librechat:settings #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Users delete their own chats at any time. At contract end we delete all of your organisation's data, with confirmation on request. ### DATA-05: Sub-processors and foreign-law exposure Judgment rule: Record the published sub-processor list with countries, change-notification rules, the vendor's and parent company's jurisdiction, transfer mechanisms (EU-US Data Privacy Framework, Swiss-US DPF, SCCs) and the vendor's documented position on foreign government access requests (e.g. US CLOUD Act). Record facts, not a legal assessment. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial ClickHouse’s acquisition is sourced; the self-hosted deployment still selects its own external processors and contracts. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - subprocessor_list: Is a dated sub-processor list published? No project-wide dated sub-processor/country list, change-notification schedule, transfer instrument or government-access policy was established for arbitrary customer-operated deployments. Website/Demo policies are separate scopes. - subprocessor_countries: Which countries do sub-processors operate in? No project-wide dated sub-processor/country list, change-notification schedule, transfer instrument or government-access policy was established for arbitrary customer-operated deployments. Website/Demo policies are separate scopes. - change_notification: Are customers notified of sub-processor changes? No project-wide dated sub-processor/country list, change-notification schedule, transfer instrument or government-access policy was established for arbitrary customer-operated deployments. Website/Demo policies are separate scopes. - parent_jurisdiction: ClickHouse, Inc. announced the LibreChat acquisition on 2025-11-04 from San Francisco and brought founder/team into ClickHouse. A self-hosted customer contracting entity/governing jurisdiction was not established from that announcement. - transfer_mechanism: Which transfer mechanism applies to non-EU/CH processing? No project-wide dated sub-processor/country list, change-notification schedule, transfer instrument or government-access policy was established for arbitrary customer-operated deployments. Website/Demo policies are separate scopes. - government_access_policy: Is there a published government-access or transparency policy? No project-wide dated sub-processor/country list, change-notification schedule, transfer instrument or government-access policy was established for arbitrary customer-operated deployments. Website/Demo policies are separate scopes. - subprocessor_list — Is a dated sub-processor list published? [unknown]: subprocessor_list: Is a dated sub-processor list published? No project-wide dated sub-processor/country list, change-notification schedule, transfer instrument or government-access policy was established for arbitrary customer-operated deployments. Website/Demo policies are separate scopes. - subprocessor_countries — Which countries do sub-processors operate in? [unknown]: subprocessor_countries: Which countries do sub-processors operate in? No project-wide dated sub-processor/country list, change-notification schedule, transfer instrument or government-access policy was established for arbitrary customer-operated deployments. Website/Demo policies are separate scopes. - change_notification — Are customers notified of sub-processor changes? [unknown]: change_notification: Are customers notified of sub-processor changes? No project-wide dated sub-processor/country list, change-notification schedule, transfer instrument or government-access policy was established for arbitrary customer-operated deployments. Website/Demo policies are separate scopes. - parent_jurisdiction — Which jurisdiction governs the vendor and its parent? [partial]: ClickHouse, Inc. announced the LibreChat acquisition on 2025-11-04 from San Francisco and brought founder/team into ClickHouse. A self-hosted customer contracting entity/governing jurisdiction was not established from that announcement. Sources: librechat:librechat:owner. - transfer_mechanism — Which transfer mechanism applies to non-EU/CH processing? [unknown]: transfer_mechanism: Which transfer mechanism applies to non-EU/CH processing? No project-wide dated sub-processor/country list, change-notification schedule, transfer instrument or government-access policy was established for arbitrary customer-operated deployments. Website/Demo policies are separate scopes. - government_access_policy — Is there a published government-access or transparency policy? [unknown]: government_access_policy: Is there a published government-access or transparency policy? No project-wide dated sub-processor/country list, change-notification schedule, transfer instrument or government-access policy was established for arbitrary customer-operated deployments. Website/Demo policies are separate scopes. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:owner #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Telesoft AG is publicly identified in Switzerland. A product subprocessor/country/change-notice schedule and government-access policy were not obtained; website processors are scoped separately. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=All public offers for entity identity; product processor terms unspecified; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Vendor Switzerland; product processor and parent countries unknown; os=not specified. Limitations: - No legal exposure verdict is made. Product contracts and website privacy terms must remain separate. - subprocessor_list — Is a dated sub-processor list published? [unknown]: The homepage advertises a public subprocessor list but no product list/document was linked or retrieved through the sitemap and legal pages. The dated website policy is not the workspace processor list. Sources: onai:public-compliance-display-20261026, onai:public-website-privacy-display-20261026. - subprocessor_countries — Which countries do sub-processors operate in? [unknown]: The product provider/country matrix is unknown. The website policy lists providers in Slovenia, Estonia, Ireland and the USA for website purposes only; these cannot be treated as product coverage. Sources: onai:public-website-privacy-display-20261026. - change_notification — Are customers notified of sub-processor changes? [unknown]: No product subprocessor change-notice period, objection rule or notification subscription was located. - parent_jurisdiction — Which jurisdiction governs the vendor and its parent? [partial]: The imprint names Telesoft AG at a Swiss address and a Swiss VAT registration. A parent-company ownership/jurisdiction record was not obtained. Sources: onai:public-imprint-display-20261026. - transfer_mechanism — Which transfer mechanism applies to non-EU/CH processing? [unknown]: Website processing cites SCCs and provider-dependent DPF. No corresponding product AI-provider/data-transfer agreement was retrieved. Sources: onai:public-website-privacy-display-20261026. - government_access_policy — Is there a published government-access or transparency policy? [unknown]: No product government-access/transparency policy or dated request report was found. Swiss incorporation alone does not establish foreign-law immunity. Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-compliance-display-20261026, onai:public-imprint-display-20261026, onai:public-website-privacy-display-20261026 ### DATA-06: Contracts and regulatory coverage Judgment rule: Record DPA availability and form (click-through, negotiable), reference to Swiss revDSG and GDPR, governing law and court, EU AI Act documentation (provider or deployer role, transparency materials), and sector-specific materials (FINMA outsourcing, banking secrecy, public sector). No compliance verdict. #### LibreChat Verification status: No public information found (not-published) Support: not-published We found no public information on this. A missing finding is not evidence that the product lacks the capability. #### onAI Verification status: Sourced (sourced) Support: partial The general public DPA inquiry path is established. DPA content, Swiss DSG/GDPR clauses, AI Act material and plan-specific document entitlements remain unverified for Per seat and Flat price; no compliance conclusion is drawn. Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-23): Data processing agreement under the Swiss FADP and the GDPR on request. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=General DPA inquiry/compliance copy only; Per seat/Flat price document entitlement unverified.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Swiss entity; claimed Swiss DSG/GDPR coverage; os=not specified. Limitations: - Remains public-candidate. A contact action and general legal labels do not establish plan-scoped contract terms or supplied regulatory documentation. - No product agreement, legal forum or sector-specific contract package was reviewed. - dpa — Is a DPA available, and is it negotiable? [partial]: A general Request the DPA contact action is public. It establishes an inquiry path, not that a particular DPA, execution procedure or negotiability option is included in Per seat or Flat price; no contract was retrieved and no sales contact was made. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps. - revdsg_gdpr — Does the DPA cover revDSG and GDPR? [unknown]: The website refers generally to Swiss DSG and GDPR, but no product DPA text or plan applicability was retrieved. Its actual revDSG/GDPR clauses and scope cannot be established from the vendor entity or marketing labels. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps, onai:public-imprint. - governing_law — Which law and court govern the contract? [unknown]: A Swiss contracting entity does not determine governing law or court. No product agreement specifying either was obtained. - ai_act_materials — Is EU AI Act documentation provided? [unknown]: The public page advertises AI Act transparency labels. No provider/deployer-role documentation, technical material, conformity scope or Per seat/Flat price delivery entitlement was obtained. Sources: onai:review-contract-plan-gaps. - sector_materials — Are FINMA or other sector materials provided? [unknown]: No FINMA outsourcing, banking secrecy, public-sector or regulated-industry contract package was obtained. Checked 2026-10-21; not separately cross-checked; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-imprint, onai:review-contract-plan-gaps ### DATA-07: Certifications and attestations Judgment rule: Record each certificate or report separately: ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, 27701, 42001; SOC 2 Type I/II with period; BSI C5; TISAX; national schemes. Record issuer, scope (which product and entity), validity and access route. A cloud provider's certificate does not certify the product. #### LibreChat Verification status: No public information found (not-published) Support: not-published We found no public information on this. A missing finding is not evidence that the product lacks the capability. #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. onAI is not currently ISO 27001 certified and has no SOC 2 report. ### DATA-08: Encryption and key control Judgment rule: Record encryption at rest and in transit, customer-managed keys (BYOK/HYOK), key location, and private networking (private link, IP allow-lists, VPN). #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Network and storage security depend on the customer’s deployment; application authentication does not certify encryption of all stored content. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - encryption_at_rest: Is data encrypted at rest? No default at-rest encryption guarantee covering MongoDB/files/PGVector or audited multi-tenant managed-service isolation was established from the installation guides. - customer_managed_keys: Operators own infrastructure and application secrets; a documented product HYOK/customer-managed content-encryption service was not verified. - tenant_isolation: How are customers separated in shared SaaS? No default at-rest encryption guarantee covering MongoDB/files/PGVector or audited multi-tenant managed-service isolation was established from the installation guides. - encryption_at_rest — Is data encrypted at rest? [unknown]: encryption_at_rest: Is data encrypted at rest? No default at-rest encryption guarantee covering MongoDB/files/PGVector or audited multi-tenant managed-service isolation was established from the installation guides. - customer_managed_keys — Can the customer manage or hold the keys? [partial]: Operators own infrastructure and application secrets; a documented product HYOK/customer-managed content-encryption service was not verified. Sources: librechat:librechat:auth, librechat:librechat:compose-pin. - private_networking — Is private connectivity or IP restriction available? [supported]: Operators deploy the stack on their own network and configure reverse proxies/HTTPS for remote access. Sources: librechat:librechat:remote, librechat:librechat:local. - tenant_isolation — How are customers separated in shared SaaS? [unknown]: tenant_isolation: How are customers separated in shared SaaS? No default at-rest encryption guarantee covering MongoDB/files/PGVector or audited multi-tenant managed-service isolation was established from the installation guides. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:auth, librechat:librechat:compose-pin, librechat:librechat:remote, librechat:librechat:local #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Connections are encrypted over HTTPS, stored data is encrypted in the cloud, and each organisation's data is logically separated. Dedicated installations and on-premises: encryption and separation follow your infrastructure. ### DATA-09: Professional secrecy Judgment rule: For professional secrecy holders (Berufsgeheimnisträger: lawyers, doctors, auditors, tax advisers) under § 203 StGB (DE) and Art. 321 StGB (CH), record whether the vendor signs a contractual secrecy undertaking or a § 203 agreement that binds its staff and its sub-processors; whether this comes as a dedicated offering or a paid add-on, and on which plan; who can access content in plain text (vendor staff, sub-processors, model providers); and the documentation provided. A DPA or a no-training clause alone is not a secrecy undertaking. Banking secrecy and FINMA outsourcing belong to DATA-06, not here. Record contract facts, not a legal assessment. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Customer-operated message storage and configurable local/external inference establish part of the content-access boundary. A LibreChat-scoped staff/sub-processor secrecy undertaking or professional-secrecy offering remains unverified. Availability: unknown Delivery: unknown Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; message schema and reference Compose pinned to v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional commercial secrecy terms unverified. Public Demo and website policies checked only to distinguish their scope; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected application, storage and model-service locations; no DE/CH professional-secrecy contract variant verified; os=not specified. Limitations: - The secrecy undertaking, sub-processor coverage, offering and professional-secrecy-specific documentation remain unknown. - content_access: Operator permissions, vendor/support grants, optional service access and provider staff access were not tested or contractually verified. - Technical data controls, a DPA, privacy wording and no-training statements do not establish the requested contractual undertaking. No legal compliance assessment is made. - secrecy_undertaking — Does the vendor sign a secrecy undertaking or § 203 StGB / Art. 321 StGB agreement covering its own staff? [unknown]: No LibreChat-scoped § 203 StGB / Art. 321 StGB undertaking binding vendor staff was obtained from the reviewed project documentation and public legal pages. The website privacy policy expressly excludes the self-hosted application; ClickHouse ownership does not establish a product-specific agreement. Sources: librechat:librechat:siteprivacy, librechat:librechat:owner. - subprocessor_coverage — Does the undertaking extend to its sub-processors, and is that documented? [unknown]: No self-hosted LibreChat professional-secrecy annex or documented extension to sub-processors was obtained. The separate Demo policy describes processor instruction/security obligations, which do not establish the undertaking requested here or coverage of a customer deployment. Sources: librechat:librechat:secrecy-demo-policy. - secrecy_offering — Is it a dedicated offering or add-on, and on which plan? [unknown]: No dedicated professional-secrecy edition, paid add-on, eligible plan or price was established in the public project/legal materials and targeted searches. The public Demo is evaluation-only and excludes confidential or regulated data; it is a separate surface. Sources: librechat:librechat:demo. - content_access — Who can access content in plain text: vendor staff, sub-processors, model providers? [partial]: The pinned reference deployment mounts customer-controlled MongoDB, uploads and logs; the message schema declares ordinary text/content fields. This places host/database operators inside the application trust boundary (an architectural inference, not a permissions audit). The first-chat and endpoint guides route prompts to a selected local or external model with customer credentials. Vendor/support access, optional service operators and provider human access remain deployment- and contract-specific and unverified. Sources: librechat:librechat:compose-pin, librechat:librechat:secrecy-message-pin, librechat:librechat:firstchat, librechat:librechat:custom. - secrecy_documentation — Is the offering publicly documented (contract template, data-flow description, professional-body guidance)? [unknown]: Public installation, endpoint and privacy documents describe technical data paths and distinguish website, Demo and self-hosted software. No LibreChat-specific DE/CH secrecy contract template, covered-party annex or professional-body guidance was located in the reviewed sources. Sources: librechat:librechat:firstchat, librechat:librechat:siteprivacy. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:siteprivacy, librechat:librechat:owner, librechat:librechat:secrecy-demo-policy, librechat:librechat:demo, librechat:librechat:compose-pin, librechat:librechat:secrecy-message-pin, librechat:librechat:firstchat, librechat:librechat:custom #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Professional-secrecy agreement (for example § 203 StGB / Art. 321 StGB) on request. ## Commercials and vendor ### VEN-01: Pricing model and list prices Judgment rule: Record pricing unit (per seat, per active user, usage-based, platform fee, hybrid), list prices per plan in original currency with date, included usage and credits, add-on prices (connectors, agents, image generation) and overage rates. Cite public prices or dated quotes. Per-seat versus usage is a fact, not a quality judgment. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial MIT software has no licence subscription; hosting, inference and optional runtime services are separately procured. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - add_ons: Optional external code/OCR/search/image services need separately configured endpoints and credentials. Their rates depend on the operator’s contracts. - overage: Provider APIs charge their account holder; internal credit balances are governance configuration rather than a single LibreChat usage tariff. - pricing_unit — What is the pricing unit? [supported]: The pinned MIT permission grant has no per-user fee; self-hosting and model accounts are customer responsibilities. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:firstchat. - list_prices — What are list prices per plan, with date and currency? [supported]: The repository’s MIT licence permits use without a software fee as retrieved 2026-10-21; there is no bundled inference subscription in this scope. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:firstchat. - included_usage — What usage is included? [supported]: LibreChat ships with no model API key and no included provider token balance. Sources: librechat:librechat:firstchat. - add_ons — Which features cost extra? [partial]: Optional external code/OCR/search/image services need separately configured endpoints and credentials. Their rates depend on the operator’s contracts. Sources: librechat:librechat:code, librechat:librechat:ocr, librechat:librechat:web, librechat:librechat:images. - overage — What do usage beyond limits and premium models cost? [partial]: Provider APIs charge their account holder; internal credit balances are governance configuration rather than a single LibreChat usage tariff. Sources: librechat:librechat:balance, librechat:librechat:tokens, librechat:librechat:firstchat. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:firstchat, librechat:librechat:code, librechat:librechat:ocr, librechat:librechat:web, librechat:librechat:images, librechat:librechat:balance, librechat:librechat:tokens #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The page lists EUR 17/user/month with EUR 5 monthly model budget; Per seat overage is actual consumption with no minimum. Flat price and detailed tariffs remain quoted or unspecified. Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-22): From €17 per user and month, including €5 of model use; lower for larger teams. Or one fixed price for the whole company. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat EUR 17/month; Flat price annual quote; publication is not GA verification; add_ons=EU-only processing option, price unknown; deployment_mode=not specified; region=European hosting; dedicated CH/DE/on-premises by quoted plan; os=not specified. Limitations: - add_ons: Per seat lists models, Image Studio, translator and Microsoft 365 access. Flat price additionally lists dedicated/on-premises hosting, own models, branding and onboarding. An EU-only processing tier is offered without a public surcharge or connector/agent add-on tariff. - overage: For Per seat, usage beyond the included model budget is billed at actual consumption, with no minimum and invoices itemized by model and quantity; the usage journal shows provider-reported token counts. No complete tariff, model conversion/multiplier, top-up or rollover schedule was retrieved. - pricing_unit — What is the pricing unit? [supported]: Per seat is priced per user/month. Flat price is one fixed annual company price with unlimited users; unlimited seats do not establish unlimited model usage. Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026. - list_prices — What are list prices per plan, with date and currency? [supported]: As retrieved 2026-10-21, Per seat is EUR 17/user/month excluding VAT. The Flat price amount is on request; no CHF list price is shown. Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026. - included_usage — What usage is included? [supported]: Per seat includes EUR 5 model budget per user/month. The page does not translate this into message/token/image quotas or state the Flat price usage allowance. Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026. - add_ons — Which features cost extra? [partial]: Per seat lists models, Image Studio, translator and Microsoft 365 access. Flat price additionally lists dedicated/on-premises hosting, own models, branding and onboarding. An EU-only processing tier is offered without a public surcharge or connector/agent add-on tariff. Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026. - overage — What do usage beyond limits and premium models cost? [partial]: For Per seat, usage beyond the included model budget is billed at actual consumption, with no minimum and invoices itemized by model and quantity; the usage journal shows provider-reported token counts. No complete tariff, model conversion/multiplier, top-up or rollover schedule was retrieved. Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026. Checked 2026-10-26; agent cross-checked 2026-10-26; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026 ### VEN-02: Scenario cost Judgment rule: Price three workloads for 12 months: 200, 1,000 and 5,000 users with a disclosed light/regular/power usage mix, in CHF and EUR excluding VAT. Include licences, platform fees, add-ons, model usage and, for self-hosted options, a stated operating assumption. Separate fixed, variable, included and unknown costs. No invented discounts. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21: zero standard licence plus a disclosed Swiss infrastructure/operations and direct-BYO-model budget. Annual CHF/EUR figures are floors plus named unknown costs. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=Analyst-selected direct OpenAI API proxy, not a bundled model, Assumed operations staffing; optional commercial services excluded; deployment_mode=customer-cloud; region=Azure Switzerland North for the reference application infrastructure; standard OpenAI API inference has no Swiss/EU residency assumption; os=not specified. Limitations: - ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21 are analyst inputs, not vendor sizing or an uptime promise. - The budget is a floor because named infrastructure and service costs are unpriced. - cost_200 — Year-one cost at 200 users? [partial]: ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21. 200 users, 12 months excluding VAT: from CHF 34778.28 / EUR 37651.06 plus unpriced items. Includes zero standard-software licence, reference infrastructure EUR 4749.26, operations CHF 30000.00, and BYO model usage USD 475.20. This is an assumption-based budget floor, not a vendor quote or validated capacity plan. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:cost-vm, librechat:librechat:cost-pg, librechat:librechat:cost-fx, librechat:librechat:cost-model, librechat:librechat:cost-effort. - cost_1000 — Year-one cost at 1,000 users? [partial]: ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21. 1,000 users, 12 months excluding VAT: from CHF 88600.40 / EUR 95919.02 plus unpriced items. Includes zero standard-software licence, reference infrastructure EUR 12605.23, operations CHF 75000.00, and BYO model usage USD 2376.00. This is an assumption-based budget floor, not a vendor quote or validated capacity plan. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:cost-vm, librechat:librechat:cost-pg, librechat:librechat:cost-fx, librechat:librechat:cost-model, librechat:librechat:cost-effort. - cost_5000 — Year-one cost at 5,000 users? [partial]: ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21. 5,000 users, 12 months excluding VAT: from CHF 189541.24 / EUR 205197.83 plus unpriced items. Includes zero standard-software licence, reference infrastructure EUR 32214.49, operations CHF 150000.00, and BYO model usage USD 11880.00. This is an assumption-based budget floor, not a vendor quote or validated capacity plan. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:cost-vm, librechat:librechat:cost-pg, librechat:librechat:cost-fx, librechat:librechat:cost-model, librechat:librechat:cost-effort. - variable_share — Which part depends on usage? [partial]: Shared mix is 60% light at 100, 30% regular at 400 and 10% power at 1,500 messages/user/month, or 330 weighted messages. Each message is 3,000 input and 600 output tokens. Direct BYO proxy is gpt-6-luna, reasoning effort none, Standard short-context uncached rates USD 0.10/0.50 per million input/output tokens. It costs USD 2.376/user/year before optional tools, embedding, caching or regional processing. This proxy is an analyst assumption, not the product default. Sources: librechat:librechat:cost-model, librechat:librechat:cost-effort. - unknown_parts — Which costs could not be priced? [partial]: Unpriced additions are file/object storage beyond the assumed 500 GB PostgreSQL storage, VM OS/data disks, backup excess, egress/load balancers, Redis or additional database services, high availability, embeddings, OCR, search, audio/images, integration work and optional commercial services. MongoDB remains the primary store, so its infrastructure, file storage and other required dependencies are additional unpriced items; PostgreSQL is only the shared RAG/reference compute assumption. The shared VM/PG sizes have not been load-tested and do not replace each product’s documented runtime dependencies. Sources: librechat:librechat:cost-vm, librechat:librechat:cost-pg, librechat:librechat:license. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:cost-vm, librechat:librechat:cost-pg, librechat:librechat:cost-fx, librechat:librechat:cost-model, librechat:librechat:cost-effort #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Under ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21, only the published Per seat component is calculable. The scenario is from that EUR/CHF floor plus unknown usage/option charges; Flat price requires a quote. Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-22): From €17 per user and month, including €5 of model use; lower for larger teams. Or one fixed price for the whole company. Availability: beta Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat list-price scenario only; Flat price and customer-operated totals unknown; add_ons=No priced add-ons included; option costs unknown; deployment_mode=multi-tenant-saas; region=Published European-hosting offer; GA unverified; os=not specified. Limitations: - ALM-14 shared cost assumptions v1.4, 2026-10-21. Horizon 12 months, full paid seats, list price, excluding VAT, no invented discounts. These are plan components, not complete workload totals. - The included model allowance is not counted twice. Annual model usage is 11.88M input and 2.376M output tokens per user under the disclosed mix, but the product billing tariff is unknown. - cost_200 — Year-one cost at 200 users? [partial]: 200 seats for 12 months: from EUR 40,800 / CHF 37,686.96 excluding VAT, plus unknown usage/option costs. EUR 12,000 annual model budget is already included, not added again. Flat price and actual workload overage are unpriced. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:ecb-fx. - cost_1000 — Year-one cost at 1,000 users? [partial]: 1,000 seats for 12 months: from EUR 204,000 / CHF 188,434.80 excluding VAT, plus unknown usage/option costs. EUR 60,000 annual model budget is already included. Flat price and actual workload overage are unpriced. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:ecb-fx. - cost_5000 — Year-one cost at 5,000 users? [partial]: 5,000 seats for 12 months: from EUR 1,020,000 / CHF 942,174 excluding VAT, plus unknown usage/option costs. EUR 300,000 annual model budget is already included. Flat price and actual workload overage are unpriced. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:ecb-fx. - variable_share — Which part depends on usage? [partial]: Shared workload: 60% light at 100, 30% regular at 400 and 10% power at 1,500 messages/user/month; each message has 3,000 input and 600 output tokens including retrieval. This is 330 messages/month/user. No onAI default-model tariff or credit-to-provider mapping is public, so no variable charge or variable percentage is invented. Sources: onai:public-pricing. - unknown_parts — Which costs could not be priced? [partial]: Unknowns include Flat price quotes, model usage beyond the included allowance, premium features/EU-only options and customer-operated infrastructure/support. No proxy API price substitutes for an unpublished onAI tariff. FX is ECB 2026-10-20: EUR 1 = CHF 0.9237 and USD 1.1215; USD/EUR reciprocal 0.8916629514043692. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:public-processing, onai:ecb-fx. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:ecb-fx, onai:public-pricing, onai:public-processing, onai:review-plan-m365, onai:review-residency-parts ### VEN-03: Evaluation access Judgment rule: Distinguish free tier, self-serve trial, sales-led pilot, paid proof of concept and open-source self-install. Record card requirement, duration, seat limit, and which features (SSO, connectors, admin) the trial includes. Map which shared scenarios can be run without sales approval. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: supported Customers can self-install without licence payment; the public demo is an evaluation-only alternative. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server, LibreChat public evaluation demo; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. - free_tier — Is there a free tier for business use? [supported]: MIT self-installation permits organizational use without a software licence fee. Sources: librechat:librechat:license. - self_serve_trial — Is a self-serve business trial available? [supported]: Self-installation has no trial clock or software card requirement; the free hosted Demo can be tried separately under its terms. Sources: librechat:librechat:local, librechat:librechat:demo. - trial_scope — Do trials include SSO, connectors and admin features? [supported]: Self-installed instances can configure SSO, Agents, file retrieval and administration with their own service accounts. It is not evidence that every experimental add-on is enabled by default. Sources: librechat:librechat:auth, librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:rag. - sales_gate — Does meaningful evaluation require sales contact? [supported]: The documented Docker install does not require sales approval; optional third-party services have separate account requirements. Sources: librechat:librechat:local, librechat:librechat:firstchat. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:local, librechat:librechat:demo, librechat:librechat:auth, librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:rag, librechat:librechat:firstchat #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-22; no third-party source. A personal demo, then trial access for your team. ### VEN-04: Contract terms and pricing transparency Judgment rule: Record minimum seats or commitment, contract length, monthly versus annual billing, price-change rules, cancellation and downgrade terms, and invoicing in CHF/EUR. Classify pricing as transparent, partially specified, quote-only or unknown, naming the missing fields. Quote-only pricing is a disclosed constraint. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The MIT licence has no seat or contract-term subscription; optional service contracts are outside that licence. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - cancellation: An operator can stop running the application; this does not cancel its separately purchased cloud/model services or establish deletion of all copies. - local_invoicing: Can it be invoiced in CHF or EUR from a European entity? CHF/EUR commercial invoicing from a European entity was not established for optional project services. - transparency_class: Source licensing is transparent; a complete all-in hosted/support/inference tariff is not included in this self-hosted offer. - minimum_commitment — What seat or spend minimum applies? [supported]: The MIT permission grant has no user-count or spending minimum for software use. Sources: librechat:librechat:license. - contract_length — What contract lengths are offered? [supported]: There is no monthly/annual licence subscription in the MIT permission grant. External hosting/API contracts are separate. Sources: librechat:librechat:license. - cancellation — How can the contract be cancelled or reduced? [partial]: An operator can stop running the application; this does not cancel its separately purchased cloud/model services or establish deletion of all copies. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:local. - local_invoicing — Can it be invoiced in CHF or EUR from a European entity? [unknown]: local_invoicing: Can it be invoiced in CHF or EUR from a European entity? CHF/EUR commercial invoicing from a European entity was not established for optional project services. - transparency_class — Is pricing transparent, partial, quote-only or unknown? [partial]: Source licensing is transparent; a complete all-in hosted/support/inference tariff is not included in this self-hosted offer. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:firstchat. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:local, librechat:librechat:firstchat #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Per seat has a public EUR headline and monthly seat flexibility; Flat price is quoted annually. Legal commitment, cancellation rules and CHF invoicing remain unverified. Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-22): From €17 per user and month, including €5 of model use; lower for larger teams. Or one fixed price for the whole company. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Per seat monthly price/seat flexibility; Flat price annual quote; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Swiss provider; EUR display; CHF invoicing unknown; os=not specified. Limitations: - Published billing frequency is not an executed minimum-term contract. No undisclosed enterprise discount is assumed. - minimum_commitment — What seat or spend minimum applies? [unknown]: No minimum seat count or spend commitment is stated on the current pricing page. The about-50-user flat-price break-even is not a contractual minimum. Sources: onai:public-pricing. - contract_length — What contract lengths are offered? [partial]: Per seat is quoted monthly and says seats can be added/removed each month. Flat price is quoted annually; the legal contract length and billing options are not supplied. Sources: onai:public-pricing. - cancellation — How can the contract be cancelled or reduced? [partial]: The page promises monthly Per seat seat changes. Cancellation notice, proration, refunds, price-change rules and downgrade terms were not obtained. Sources: onai:public-pricing. - local_invoicing — Can it be invoiced in CHF or EUR from a European entity? [partial]: Prices are displayed in EUR and the identified provider is Swiss Telesoft AG. Actual invoice currency, CHF availability and VAT/payment terms were not verified. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:public-imprint. - transparency_class — Is pricing transparent, partial, quote-only or unknown? [supported]: Partially specified: the Per seat headline and allowance are public; Flat price is quote-only and usage overage, option prices and legal terms are missing. Sources: onai:public-pricing. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-imprint, onai:public-pricing ### VEN-05: Source licence Judgment rule: Record licence per component (client, server, connectors, hosted extensions) and revision. Distinguish OSI open source, source-available with restrictions (branding clauses, user caps), and closed. Repository visibility is not a licence classification. Licences change between releases: record the current terms, and never carry a fork's historical licence over to the upstream product or the reverse. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The pinned main repository is MIT licensed; no user-count or product-branding clause appears in that licence. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - enterprise_features_closed: The project documents a separate preview admin panel and optional code services. A closed enterprise-edition boundary for the main repository was not established. - licence_type — Which licence applies to each component? [supported]: The main client/server repository at v0.8.8 is MIT. Separate Code Interpreter, admin-panel, connector or hosted-service components need their own licence review. Sources: librechat:librechat:license. - branding_restrictions — Do licence terms restrict branding or user counts? [supported]: The MIT grant permits use/modification/distribution subject to retaining its copyright and permission notice; it includes no 50-user cap or mandatory UI branding clause. Sources: librechat:librechat:license. - enterprise_features_closed — Are enterprise features in a separate closed edition? [partial]: The project documents a separate preview admin panel and optional code services. A closed enterprise-edition boundary for the main repository was not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:admin, librechat:librechat:code, librechat:librechat:license. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:license, librechat:librechat:admin, librechat:librechat:code #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Proprietary software from onAI; the source code is not public. Included open-source components are under their own licences. ### VEN-06: Data export and exit Judgment rule: Record admin export of chats, assistants, knowledge bases, prompts and audit logs, formats, export completeness, user self-export, and what survives contract end. Run an admin export on a trial. Exported chats alone do not make assistants and knowledge portable. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Users can export conversations in machine-readable formats; organization-wide Agent/knowledge exit completeness remains unverified. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - chat_export: Pinned client code exports a user-selected conversation, including optional branches/options. A documented admin bulk export of every user’s chats was not established. - assistant_export: Beta management APIs expose Agent/Skill objects, but a reusable complete assistant/prompt export fixture was not verified. - knowledge_export: Can knowledge bases and their sources be exported? No admin exit fixture, knowledge-source/index portability test or commercial post-termination retrieval window was verified; infrastructure backups are operator-owned. - post_termination_window: How long can data be retrieved after termination? No admin exit fixture, knowledge-source/index portability test or commercial post-termination retrieval window was verified; infrastructure backups are operator-owned. - chat_export — Can admins export all chats? [partial]: Pinned client code exports a user-selected conversation, including optional branches/options. A documented admin bulk export of every user’s chats was not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:export-pin. - assistant_export — Can assistants and prompts be exported in a reusable format? [partial]: Beta management APIs expose Agent/Skill objects, but a reusable complete assistant/prompt export fixture was not verified. Sources: librechat:librechat:api. - knowledge_export — Can knowledge bases and their sources be exported? [unknown]: knowledge_export: Can knowledge bases and their sources be exported? No admin exit fixture, knowledge-source/index portability test or commercial post-termination retrieval window was verified; infrastructure backups are operator-owned. - export_format — Are formats documented and machine-readable? [supported]: Conversation export code supports JSON, CSV, Markdown and text. This establishes format availability, not complete organization-data portability. Sources: librechat:librechat:export-pin. - post_termination_window — How long can data be retrieved after termination? [unknown]: post_termination_window: How long can data be retrieved after termination? No admin exit fixture, knowledge-source/index portability test or commercial post-termination retrieval window was verified; infrastructure backups are operator-owned. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:export-pin, librechat:librechat:api #### onAI Verification status: Stated by onAI (stated-by-vendor) Support: stated Evidence type: vendor-statement; asserted 2026-10-23; no third-party source. Users export their chats as JSON; an export for the whole organisation on request. ### VEN-07: Support and service levels Judgment rule: Record support channels, languages (German, French, Italian), hours and time zone, local or regional presence, documented response times, uptime SLA and credits, public status page and incident history. Popularity is not a reliability score. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Public project/community channels are available; a binding business support SLA was not established. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - support_channels: Public GitHub issue reporting and community channels are documented; a supported enterprise channel/response-time matrix was not established for MIT self-hosting. - support_languages: Is support available in German, French or Italian? No DE/FR/IT support coverage, CH/DACH legal/partner presence, priced uptime credits or product-service incident-history contract was verified in the public docs, site and release pass. - regional_presence: Is there a DACH or Swiss entity, team or partner? No DE/FR/IT support coverage, CH/DACH legal/partner presence, priced uptime credits or product-service incident-history contract was verified in the public docs, site and release pass. - uptime_sla: Is there an uptime SLA with credits? No DE/FR/IT support coverage, CH/DACH legal/partner presence, priced uptime credits or product-service incident-history contract was verified in the public docs, site and release pass. - status_page: Is there a public status page with history? No DE/FR/IT support coverage, CH/DACH legal/partner presence, priced uptime credits or product-service incident-history contract was verified in the public docs, site and release pass. - support_channels — Which support channels are available on each plan? [partial]: Public GitHub issue reporting and community channels are documented; a supported enterprise channel/response-time matrix was not established for MIT self-hosting. Sources: librechat:librechat:logging, librechat:librechat:firstchat. - support_languages — Is support available in German, French or Italian? [unknown]: support_languages: Is support available in German, French or Italian? No DE/FR/IT support coverage, CH/DACH legal/partner presence, priced uptime credits or product-service incident-history contract was verified in the public docs, site and release pass. - regional_presence — Is there a DACH or Swiss entity, team or partner? [unknown]: regional_presence: Is there a DACH or Swiss entity, team or partner? No DE/FR/IT support coverage, CH/DACH legal/partner presence, priced uptime credits or product-service incident-history contract was verified in the public docs, site and release pass. - uptime_sla — Is there an uptime SLA with credits? [unknown]: uptime_sla: Is there an uptime SLA with credits? No DE/FR/IT support coverage, CH/DACH legal/partner presence, priced uptime credits or product-service incident-history contract was verified in the public docs, site and release pass. - status_page — Is there a public status page with history? [unknown]: status_page: Is there a public status page with history? No DE/FR/IT support coverage, CH/DACH legal/partner presence, priced uptime credits or product-service incident-history contract was verified in the public docs, site and release pass. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:logging, librechat:librechat:firstchat #### onAI Verification status: Sourced (sourced) Support: partial The Swiss provider identity, general company contact and Website-only public status history are established. Support channels, languages/hours, response targets and uptime credits for Per seat and Flat price remain unknown. Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-23): A direct line to the team, no call centre, in German and English. Onboarding and training are included in the fixed price. We build custom agents and workflows as a service. Service levels and response times are agreed in the contract. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public provider website and status sources retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Company identity/contact and Website-only status facts; Per seat/Flat price support entitlement unverified.; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Swiss legal entity; support staffing/access countries unknown; os=not specified. Limitations: - Remains public-candidate: entity identity and website-status facts are separated from unverified product-plan support commitments. - The Website-only service history and generic custom-development SLA wording do not establish a workspace uptime target or credit schedule. - support_channels — Which support channels are available on each plan? [unknown]: The company publishes info@onaihq.com and a general inquiry/demo form. No public evidence maps these to a contracted support desk for Per seat or Flat price, or states hours, escalation and response commitments. Sources: onai:public-imprint, onai:public-services. - support_languages — Is support available in German, French or Italian? [unknown]: English/German website and UI copy do not establish contractual DE/FR/IT support languages or support hours. - regional_presence — Is there a DACH or Swiss entity, team or partner? [supported]: The imprint identifies Telesoft AG in Oberwil-Lieli, Switzerland, with a Swiss VAT registration. No reseller roster is inferred. Sources: onai:public-imprint. - uptime_sla — Is there an uptime SLA with credits? [unknown]: Custom development copy mentions SLAs but supplies no product uptime target, measurement, exclusions or credit schedule. A status percentage is not a contractual SLA. Sources: onai:public-services. - status_page — Is there a public status page with history? [partial]: The first-party-linked status page has notice history for Website only. This is a marketing-website status fact, not a Per seat/Flat price workspace/API status promise or support entitlement. Sources: onai:review-status-service-scope. Checked 2026-10-21; not separately cross-checked; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-imprint, onai:public-services, onai:review-status-service-scope ### VEN-08: Onboarding, training and adoption Judgment rule: Record vendor-led onboarding, admin training, end-user training (live, e-learning, languages), use-case libraries, champion programmes, change-management materials and their cost. Distinguish included services from paid professional services and partner offerings. #### LibreChat Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial Self-hosting and Agent use have public setup guides; vendor-led training/adoption packages were not verified. Availability: generally-available Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=Customer-operated web application and server; version=Public documentation retrieved 2026-10-21; inspected source v0.8.8 / e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0; plan=MIT customer-operated LibreChat; optional separately deployed services identified per answer; add_ons=none stated; deployment_mode=on-premise; region=Customer-selected infrastructure; model, OCR, search, observability and support services separately scoped; os=not specified. Limitations: - onboarding_service: Is guided onboarding included? No included guided rollout, local-language end-user training, champion programme, change-management service or professional-service price list was established from the official documentation and site. - user_training: Is end-user training offered, in which languages? No included guided rollout, local-language end-user training, champion programme, change-management service or professional-service price list was established from the official documentation and site. - use_case_library: The Agent and setup guides include examples and tutorials; a role-based enterprise training/use-case program was not established. - adoption_programme: Is there a champion or adoption programme? No included guided rollout, local-language end-user training, champion programme, change-management service or professional-service price list was established from the official documentation and site. - service_cost: Which services cost extra? No included guided rollout, local-language end-user training, champion programme, change-management service or professional-service price list was established from the official documentation and site. - onboarding_service — Is guided onboarding included? [unknown]: onboarding_service: Is guided onboarding included? No included guided rollout, local-language end-user training, champion programme, change-management service or professional-service price list was established from the official documentation and site. - user_training — Is end-user training offered, in which languages? [unknown]: user_training: Is end-user training offered, in which languages? No included guided rollout, local-language end-user training, champion programme, change-management service or professional-service price list was established from the official documentation and site. - use_case_library — Are role-based use cases and templates provided? [partial]: The Agent and setup guides include examples and tutorials; a role-based enterprise training/use-case program was not established. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:firstchat. - adoption_programme — Is there a champion or adoption programme? [unknown]: adoption_programme: Is there a champion or adoption programme? No included guided rollout, local-language end-user training, champion programme, change-management service or professional-service price list was established from the official documentation and site. - service_cost — Which services cost extra? [unknown]: service_cost: Which services cost extra? No included guided rollout, local-language end-user training, champion programme, change-management service or professional-service price list was established from the official documentation and site. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: librechat:librechat:agents, librechat:librechat:firstchat #### onAI Verification status: Agent cross-checked (agent-cross-checked) Support: partial The vendor offers training, workshops and custom agent services. Flat price lists onboarding/training/workshops; languages, delivery scope and separate service costs remain unknown. Stated by onAI (evidence type vendor-statement, asserted 2026-10-23): A direct line to the team, no call centre, in German and English. Onboarding and training are included in the fixed price. We build custom agents and workflows as a service. Service levels and response times are agreed in the contract. Availability: unknown Delivery: native Scope: surfaces=onAI browser workspace; version=Public page retrieved 2026-10-21; plan=Flat price named services included; Per seat/service contract unspecified; add_ons=Bespoke agent/workflow development, quoted scope; deployment_mode=not specified; region=Delivery geography and languages unspecified; os=not specified. Limitations: - Vendor/partner professional services are distinguished from native product workflow automation. No service outcome or price is invented. - onboarding_service — Is guided onboarding included? [supported]: The public Flat price offer includes onboarding, training and workshops. Per seat inclusion and precise deliverables are not specified. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:public-services. - user_training — Is end-user training offered, in which languages? [partial]: The vendor offers practical prompt/tool/best-practice sessions tailored to Marketing, HR and IT. Session format, DE/FR/IT languages, hours and e-learning availability were not retrieved. Sources: onai:public-services. - use_case_library — Are role-based use cases and templates provided? [unknown]: The site describes use-case workshops and public guides, but no role-based in-product use-case/template library inventory or licence was obtained. - adoption_programme — Is there a champion or adoption programme? [unknown]: No scoped champion programme, change-management package or measured adoption service deliverable was retrieved; generic skills guides do not establish one. - service_cost — Which services cost extra? [unknown]: Flat price includes named services but its amount is quoted; separate Per seat onboarding, training, workshops and custom-development fees are not published. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:public-services. Checked 2026-10-21; agent cross-checked 2026-10-21; check again by 2026-12-20. Sources: onai:public-pricing, onai:public-services ## Sources ### librechat:librechat:custom Custom endpoints. Operators configure compatible endpoints and customer-held keys, including local and hosted services. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/quick_start/custom_endpoints - Locator: Endpoint setup; API key; base URL; model list - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:azure Azure OpenAI configuration. Azure OpenAI uses customer deployment groups, instance names and credentials. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/librechat_yaml/ai_endpoints/azure - Locator: Deployment groups; API credentials - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:bedrock AWS Bedrock object structure. Bedrock routes use customer AWS configuration and region selection. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/librechat_yaml/object_structure/aws_bedrock - Locator: Region; credentials; model selection - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:vertex Anthropic Vertex AI configuration. Claude can run through customer Google Vertex AI credentials and regions. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/librechat_yaml/object_structure/anthropic_vertex - Locator: Project and region configuration - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:modelspec Model specifications. Administrators can enforce configured model presets and defaults; available endpoints still depend on customer credentials. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/librechat_yaml/object_structure/model_specs - Locator: enforce; preset; modelSelect; addedEndpoints - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:agents Agents. Agents combine instructions, models, files, tools, skills and sharing permissions, with visible execution and configurable approval. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/agents - Locator: Builder; Capabilities; Version history; Sharing; Activity; tool approval - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:ocr OCR for documents. OCR can augment text extraction, or files can be sent to compatible provider APIs; format and model limitations remain. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/ocr - Locator: File Context; Upload as Text; Optional OCR; Limitations - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:releases LibreChat v0.8.8 release. The stable release documents agent controls, current model updates and explicitly experimental schedules/workspaces and beta Agents API. - URL: https://github.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/releases/tag/v0.8.8 - Locator: Highlights, 2026-10-01 - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: 2026-10-01 - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:public-models-display-20261026 onAI public product and pricing page. The page names Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok and Mistral, user model selection and administrator allow-lists, without exact chat model IDs. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: Ready for the whole company from day one > Every leading model; AI Gateway; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19 - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### librechat:librechat:firstchat Your first chat. LibreChat ships without a model key; the public demo is for evaluation rather than private or durable data. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/quick_start/first_chat - Locator: Software you host yourself; endpoint credentials; public demo - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:code Code Interpreter API. A separate code execution service supports multiple languages and downloadable generated files; stateful/attached modes are experimental. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/code_interpreter - Locator: Setup; self-hosted service; workspace permissions; generated files - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:license LibreChat v0.8.8 MIT licence. The pinned repository is MIT licensed with copyright/permission notice preservation and an as-is disclaimer. - URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0/LICENSE - Locator: LICENSE, permission grant and notice requirement - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:ragcfg RAG API configuration. OpenAI, Hugging Face and Ollama embedding configurations are documented; image choice affects local embedding support. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/rag_api - Locator: Embedding providers; lite image; full image - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:access Granular access control. Roles, groups and resource ACLs govern features and sharing, with Entra groups synchronized at sign-in. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/access_control - Locator: Feature permissions; Resource ACLs; System grants; Groups - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:admin LibreChat Admin Panel. A separate browser management panel is available for testing and uses the underlying LibreChat admin APIs. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/admin_panel - Locator: Status Preview; separate service; admin APIs - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:balance Balance configuration. Optional token-credit balances initialize and refill user credits; tracking is disabled by default. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/librechat_yaml/object_structure/balance - Locator: enabled; startBalance; refill configuration - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:mod Automated moderation. Moderation scores abusive login/registration/message activity and may ban users; it is not a documented content DLP classifier. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/mod_system - Locator: Violation scoring and limits - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:balance-pin LibreChat balance admission implementation. The pinned middleware reserves user credits and throws a TOKEN_BALANCE error when the reservation cannot be admitted. - URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0/packages/api/src/middleware/checkBalance.ts - Locator: packages/api/src/middleware/checkBalance.ts, checkBalance - Evidence kind: source-inspected - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 - Commit: e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0 - Path: packages/api/src/middleware/checkBalance.ts ### librechat:librechat:rag RAG API. A separate RAG API indexes uploaded content in PostgreSQL/PGVector for retrieval. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/rag_api - Locator: Architecture; document indexing; embeddings; semantic search - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:text Upload files as text. Text upload injects extracted file content rather than relying only on vector retrieval. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/upload_as_text - Locator: Full text extraction and context - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:filecfg File configuration. File limits and formats are configurable by endpoint and file processing route. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/librechat_yaml/object_structure/file_config - Locator: File limits; MIME patterns; provider routes - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:r4-spreadsheet-parser LibreChat spreadsheet text parser. The built-in parser accepts XLSX/XLS/ODS and serializes each sheet as its name followed by CSV values. It does not establish preserved workbook layout, recalculated formulas or fixture accuracy. - URL: https://github.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/blob/a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b/packages/api/src/files/documents/crud.ts - Locator: getParserForMimeType; excelSheetToText, lines 109-129 - Evidence kind: source-inspected - Source date: 2026-10-24 - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 - Commit: a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b - Path: packages/api/src/files/documents/crud.ts ### librechat:librechat:r4-text-current LibreChat current Upload as Text guide. The development guide lists XLSX/XLS/ODS parsing up to 15 MB and token-bounded text injection, not a formatted spreadsheet editor. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/upload_as_text - Locator: Built-in parser; supported documents; truncation - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### librechat:librechat:projects Projects. Projects persist files and instructions across a user’s chats but cannot be shared or transferred. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/projects - Locator: Availability; personal scope; files and instructions - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:sharepoint SharePoint and OneDrive integration. The Microsoft file picker uses Entra token reuse and delegated on-behalf-of downloads to attach files. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/sharepoint - Locator: Prerequisites; delegated permissions; admin consent - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:mcp MCP. MCP servers can be configured through YAML or the permission-gated UI, including per-user OAuth. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/mcp - Locator: YAML/UI setup; authentication; ownership and selection - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:mcpcfg MCP server configuration. Configuration includes stdio, SSE and Streamable HTTP transports and server-specific credentials. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/librechat_yaml/object_structure/mcp_servers - Locator: Transport examples; headers; OAuth - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:public-m365-display-20261026 onAI public product and pricing page. The page lists live Microsoft 365 sources, optional channel/transcript permissions and optional Copilot-licensed search and meeting notes. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: Answers from your Microsoft 365, live > Where onAI looks; Your admin can add; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19 - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### onai:public-m365-permissions-display-20261026 onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor describes delegated read-only requests under each user, no copied library index, source citations, admin model restrictions and Microsoft administrator consent. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: Your Microsoft permissions stay in charge; For IT; Every permission onAI can request; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19 - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### onai:public-other-connectors-display-20261026 onAI public product and pricing page. The FAQ describes Microsoft 365 live retrieval and names Confluence, S3 and custom sources through standard connectors or an API; it gives no connector-by-connector setup or plan catalogue. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: FAQ > How is our data integrated into the system?; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19 - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### onai:review-m365-boundaries-display-20261026 onAI live Microsoft 365 retrieval and citation description. The vendor describes delegated Microsoft permission checks, live reads without a second library index, retrieved material retained in the asking user’s chat and numbered source links. - URL: https://onaihq.com/#microsoft365 - Locator: Your Microsoft permissions stay in charge; Nothing copied, nothing indexed; Sources on every answer; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, HTTP 200 body SHA256 a074779dc4d08c5e48440218bbc01353565673585b9e0f7eab517ed9687b77fa - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### onai:review-plan-m365-display-20261026 onAI live pricing: named Microsoft 365 plan scope. The Per seat card expressly includes Microsoft 365 answers and the Flat price card includes everything in Per seat; the cards do not establish separate DPA, provider-retention or support entitlements. - URL: https://onaihq.com/#pricing - Locator: Per seat > Answers from Microsoft 365, with each user’s own permissions; Flat price > Everything in Per seat, for every employee; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, HTTP 200 body SHA256 a074779dc4d08c5e48440218bbc01353565673585b9e0f7eab517ed9687b77fa - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### librechat:librechat:compose-pin LibreChat Docker service configuration. The pinned example runs a MongoDB primary store and a separate PGVector/RAG service with customer-mounted data. - URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0/docker-compose.yml - Locator: docker-compose.yml, api/mongodb/vectordb/rag_api services - Evidence kind: source-inspected - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 - Commit: e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0 - Path: docker-compose.yml ### librechat:librechat:memory User memory. Configured user memory stores cross-chat key/value context with user editing controls; it does not index all past chats. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/memory - Locator: Key/value store; controls; disabled by default - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:images Image generation and editing. Agents can use configured image tools for generation/editing; provider credentials and model parameters are separate. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/image_gen - Locator: OpenAI Image Tools; provider setup; admin configuration - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:web Web search. Search can use Serper, SearXNG, Tavily or Keenable, with independently configured scraping and optional reranking. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/web_search - Locator: Provider, scraper and reranker configuration - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:schedule Scheduled Chats. Opt-in experimental schedules execute saved Agents with cron/time zones and recheck access and balance before running. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/scheduled_chats - Locator: Experimental and disabled by default; runtime and permissions - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:api Agents API beta. The beta API exposes chat/Responses inference, Agent/Skill management and authenticated event delivery. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/agents_api - Locator: Inference; management; Agent Events; authentication - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:onai:review-fix-public-workflow-scope-20261026 onAI public workflow and service offer. The undated public homepage labels the native workflow engine coming soon and describes n8n integration operated by onAI, the customer or a partner, with workflow construction offered on request. It gives no native release date or plan-specific workflow entitlement. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: Automation platform; Coming soon; n8n service/operator sentence; direct public GET HTTP200 2026-10-26, body SHA256 1ea21a62b3a2bb75b66287a93fd86a47984d51519e7fd99f4ca53930996219bc - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### librechat:librechat:retention Temporary chat and data retention. Operators configure expiry for chats/messages/files/shared links; normal chats do not expire by default and memories are excluded. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/temporary_chat - Locator: Default 30-day temporary retention; all/ephemeral; deadlines; memories - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:insights Admin Insights. Insights reports persisted MongoDB activity and identifiable recent conversations; it is not monetary billing analytics. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/insights - Locator: Opt-in; capabilities; metrics; tenant scope - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:local Docker installation. Docker self-installation runs LibreChat with its configured service dependencies. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/local/docker - Locator: Installation; configuration; updating - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:public-web-client onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor describes an employee workspace in a current browser with nothing to install; native client availability is unspecified. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: The platform > AI Tools; FAQ > What prerequisites do we need to meet? - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:public-images onAI public product and pricing page. Image Studio advertises GPT Image, Nano Banana Pro, Imagen 4 and FLUX.3, up to three models per prompt, upload editing, per-image estimated costs and administrator controls. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: Every leading image model in one studio; Compare side by side; Edit in plain words; Run by your admins - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:public-image-rights onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor says generated images may be used commercially; provider-specific output terms are not supplied. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: Every leading image model in one studio > commercial use - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:speech Speech configuration. Administrators configure audio provider engines and models separately from text generation. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/librechat_yaml/object_structure/speech - Locator: Speech-to-text and text-to-speech engines - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:speech-conversation-r2 LibreChat conversation-mode speech settings. Conversation mode chains transcription, auto-send and TTS playback for hands-free turns after microphone activation; engines and audio routing are separately configured. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/stt_tts - Locator: Speech Tab: conversationMode, autoTranscribeAudio, autoSendText, automaticPlayback; engine and allowedAddresses settings - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:artifacts Artifacts. Artifacts render generated React, HTML and Mermaid content in the chat interface. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/artifacts - Locator: React, HTML and Mermaid previews - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:share Shareable links. Shared links publish a transcript branch and optional file snapshots independently of the owner’s live file ACL. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/shareable_links - Locator: Authentication defaults; file snapshots; continuation - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:i18n-pin LibreChat locale registration. The pinned client registers English, German, French and Italian translations among its supported locales. - URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0/client/src/locales/i18n.ts - Locator: client/src/locales/i18n.ts, language resources - Evidence kind: source-inspected - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 - Commit: e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0 - Path: client/src/locales/i18n.ts ### librechat:librechat:auth Authentication system. Local/LDAP accounts can be required to use TOTP; federated MFA belongs to the identity provider and account creation/deletion scripts are documented. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/authentication - Locator: Required two-factor authentication; Registration; User scripts - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:openid OAuth2 and OIDC. LibreChat documents OAuth2/OIDC providers including Microsoft Entra, Google, Keycloak and Auth0. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/authentication/OAuth2-OIDC - Locator: Supported providers; setup - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:saml SAML authentication. SAML is a documented authentication option for the self-hosted application. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/authentication/SAML - Locator: Overview and requirements - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:entra Azure Entra authentication. Entra OIDC supports group-based admission and Graph integration using configured scopes and token reuse. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/authentication/OAuth2-OIDC/azure - Locator: Group claims; token reuse; Microsoft Graph integration - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:public-pricing-display-20261026 onAI public product and pricing page. Published EUR pricing is 17 per user/month with 5 of monthly model budget; a flat annual price is on request, with unlimited users and dedicated/on-premises options. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: Pay per seat, or one price for everyone > Per seat; Flat price; prices excluding VAT; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19 - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### librechat:librechat:tokens Token usage. Usage and estimated costs use recorded tokens and configured provider rates; transactions are distinct from balance enforcement. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/token_usage - Locator: Context cost; transactions; per-endpoint token rates - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:logging Logging. Backend operational logs are written to customer files and can feed external tools; the guide describes 14-day rotation rather than a compliance archive. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/logging - Locator: Error/debug logs; rotation; external tools - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:r4-content-filter LibreChat development content-filter configuration. Opt-in base-YAML policies inspect selected message/file content; block and audit differ from limited Agent text redaction. This is development documentation, not a hosted DLP assurance. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/librechat_yaml/object_structure/message_filter - Locator: Source-Aware Filters; Pattern Configuration; Redaction; File Fields - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### librechat:librechat:r4-pii-runtime LibreChat content-inspection runtime. Source-aware configured inspection executes in the LibreChat API. Missing policy disables that scope; configured actions and fields bound inspection. - URL: https://github.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/blob/a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b/packages/api/src/protection/runtime.ts - Locator: createConfiguredContentInspector; source rule configuration - Evidence kind: source-inspected - Source date: 2026-10-24 - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 - Commit: a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b - Path: packages/api/src/protection/runtime.ts ### librechat:librechat:r4-patterns LibreChat pattern detector. Default starter patterns detect credential-shaped tokens/headers. Operator custom patterns use bounded regular expressions; a generic comprehensive PII classifier is not established. - URL: https://github.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/blob/a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b/packages/api/src/protection/detectors/pattern.ts - Locator: STARTER_PATTERNS; configured RE2JS rules - Evidence kind: source-inspected - Source date: 2026-10-24 - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 - Commit: a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b - Path: packages/api/src/protection/detectors/pattern.ts ### librechat:librechat:r4-private-submission LibreChat private text submission. The private text ingress permits configured redaction only on eligible fresh interactive Agent text. Original content is encrypted; edit/resume/file paths do not gain blanket redaction. - URL: https://github.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/blob/a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b/packages/api/src/protection/private/submission.ts - Locator: createPrivateTextIngress; fresh Agent text and clientRequestId checks - Evidence kind: source-inspected - Source date: 2026-10-24 - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 - Commit: a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b - Path: packages/api/src/protection/private/submission.ts ### librechat:librechat:r4-filter-middleware LibreChat API content-filter middleware. The server middleware applies configured inspection and rejects blocked/uninspectable requests with HTTP 400. No deployment or detection fixture was run. - URL: https://github.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/blob/a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b/packages/api/src/middleware/messageFilterPii.ts - Locator: createMessageFilterPii; contentFilterBlockResponse; uninspectable response - Evidence kind: source-inspected - Source date: 2026-10-24 - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 - Commit: a378657583567310c841d652b0f6b00c83e2bd6b - Path: packages/api/src/middleware/messageFilterPii.ts ### librechat:librechat:r4-config-1318 LibreChat config v1.3.18 changelog. Dated development config changes add limited Agent text redaction and ephemeral retention mode. These are not a promise of universal redaction or a vendor zero-retention contract. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/changelog/config_v1.3.18 - Locator: October 22, 2026; opt-in PII redaction; retention mode - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: 2026-10-22 - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### librechat:librechat:interface Interface configuration. Administrators configure UI feature permissions and usage terms in the self-hosted deployment. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/configuration/librechat_yaml/object_structure/interface - Locator: Feature permissions; custom welcome and terms - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:remote Remote hosting. The application can be deployed on customer-selected remote servers with operator-managed security. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/remote - Locator: Hosting options; security considerations - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:demo LibreChat Demo terms. The free hosted Demo is offered as-is with possible data cleanups and no durable business-service guarantee. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/demo/terms - Locator: Evaluation scope; retention; disclaimer - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: 2026-03-12 - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:review-contract-plan-gaps onAI live general privacy and contract-request copy. General no-training, optional zero-retention and DPA/AI Act copy is published outside the plan cards, without a retrieved contract or eligibility mapping to Per seat and Flat price. - URL: https://onaihq.com/#sovereignty - Locator: No training on your data; EU-only processing on request; Everything your data protection officer will ask for; Request the DPA; Per seat/Flat price cards - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:settings Personal settings. Users configure interface language, audio and personal data controls. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/settings - Locator: Language; speech; data controls - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:owner ClickHouse acquisition of LibreChat. ClickHouse announced the acquisition of LibreChat and that Danny Avila and the team joined ClickHouse. - URL: https://clickhouse.com/blog/clickhouse-acquires-librechat - Locator: Announcement, November 4, 2025 - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: 2025-11-04 - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:public-compliance-display-20261026 onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor advertises a DPA, a public subprocessor list, retention periods and AI Act labels, but the DPA link opens contact rather than the documents. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: Everything your data protection officer will ask for; Swiss contract, two laws; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 f2b7d5764994efe8fb87021fe13d7295155dd04ec09c8ed7826fcb52acc42b19 - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### onai:public-imprint-display-20261026 onAI imprint. The imprint identifies Telesoft AG in Oberwil-Lieli, Switzerland and Swiss VAT number CHE-106.160.588. - URL: https://onaihq.com/impressum - Locator: Contact; Represented by; VAT number; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 fcb4521fcdfb47e2ab714fee34a0fae0c1bdebca90481980bb3cb136410908fd - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### onai:public-website-privacy-display-20261026 onAI website privacy policy. The policy expressly covers the marketing website, including website processors and retention; it does not establish product workspace processor or retention terms. - URL: https://onaihq.com/datenschutz - Locator: Last updated October 2026; introductory scope; sections 5, 6 and 9; re-retrieved 2026-10-26, public web-reader representation SHA256 42ebec9df5cca263fd029ce2dcd8195487b6ee8e72cff07a6431731d8d462ec4 - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### onai:public-imprint onAI imprint. The imprint identifies Telesoft AG in Oberwil-Lieli, Switzerland and Swiss VAT number CHE-106.160.588. - URL: https://onaihq.com/impressum - Locator: Contact; Represented by; VAT number - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:siteprivacy LibreChat website privacy policy. Website, demo and self-hosted software are distinct privacy scopes; website terms do not establish a customer deployment DPA. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/privacy - Locator: Scope and exclusions - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:secrecy-message-pin LibreChat v0.8.8 message storage schema. The pinned Mongoose schema declares message text as a String and content as mixed fields; this source does not establish operator exclusion from live content. - URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0/packages/data-schemas/src/schema/message.ts - Locator: packages/data-schemas/src/schema/message.ts, text at lines 55-58 and content at lines 139-143 - Evidence kind: source-inspected - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 - Commit: e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0 - Path: packages/data-schemas/src/schema/message.ts ### librechat:librechat:secrecy-demo-policy LibreChat Demo privacy policy. The Demo policy describes model-provider transmission and contractual processor instruction/security duties for the Demo; it does not cover a customer self-hosted deployment. - URL: https://www.librechat.ai/demo/privacy - Locator: Scope; section 4 Third-Party AI Model Providers; section 6 Data Sharing and Sub-Processors - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: 2026-03-12 - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:onai:public-automation-status-20261026 onAI automation and open interfaces. The homepage labels its own workflow engine and MCP coming soon. Until then it describes n8n integration operated by onAI, the customer or a partner, with custom workflows as a requested service. No native release date or schedule/trigger entitlement is published. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: Automation platform, Open interfaces and service sections; HTTP 200, body SHA256 a074779dc4d08c5e48440218bbc01353565673585b9e0f7eab517ed9687b77fa - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-26 ### librechat:librechat:cost-vm Azure Retail Prices, Switzerland North Linux VMs. EUR hourly PAYG rates retrieved 2026-10-21 are 0.2226, 0.4453 and 0.8905 for D4s, D8s and D16s v5 respectively. - URL: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices?currencyCode=EUR&%24filter=armRegionName+eq+%27switzerlandnorth%27+and+serviceName+eq+%27Virtual+Machines%27+and+%28armSkuName+eq+%27Standard_D4s_v5%27+or+armSkuName+eq+%27Standard_D8s_v5%27+or+armSkuName+eq+%27Standard_D16s_v5%27%29+and+priceType+eq+%27Consumption%27 - Locator: Consumption; Virtual Machines Dsv5 Series; Standard_D4s_v5/D8s_v5/D16s_v5 - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:cost-pg Azure Retail Prices, PostgreSQL Flexible Server. EUR hourly PAYG GP compute is 0.2288, 0.4576 and 0.9152 for 2/4/8 vCore; storage is EUR 0.1325 per GB-month. - URL: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices?currencyCode=EUR&%24filter=armRegionName+eq+%27switzerlandnorth%27+and+serviceName+eq+%27Azure+Database+for+PostgreSQL%27+and+priceType+eq+%27Consumption%27 - Locator: General Purpose Ddsv5 Series Compute, 2/4/8 vCore; Flex Server Storage - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:cost-fx ECB euro reference rate history. The 2026-10-20 reference rates are EUR 1 = USD 1.1215 and CHF 0.9237. - URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/eurofxref/eurofxref-hist.xml - Locator: Cube time=2026-10-20; USD and CHF - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: 2026-10-20 - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:cost-model OpenAI API pricing. Standard gpt-6-luna API price is USD 0.10 per million input tokens and USD 0.50 per million output tokens; caching, batch and regional premiums are separate. - URL: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing - Locator: Standard, short-context gpt-6-luna row - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:cost-effort GPT-6 Luna model documentation. The model accepts reasoning effort none, the lowest documented effort, and lists the same standard text-token rates. - URL: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-6-luna - Locator: Reasoning effort and text-token pricing - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:public-processing onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor claims no model training, filtered search/image prompts and an optional EU-only processing tier with provider zero retention; contracts and provider exceptions are not supplied. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: What leaves, and how > No training; Personal data; European AI; EU-only processing on request - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:public-pricing onAI public product and pricing page. Published EUR pricing is 17 per user/month with 5 of monthly model budget; a flat annual price is on request, with unlimited users and dedicated/on-premises options. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: Pay per seat, or one price for everyone > Per seat; Flat price; prices excluding VAT - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:ecb-fx ECB euro reference exchange rates. On 2026-10-20 one EUR equals USD 1.1215 and CHF 0.9237; USD to EUR is the reciprocal, 0.8916629514043692. - URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/eurofxref/eurofxref-hist-90d.xml - Locator: Cube time=2026-10-20; currency USD and CHF - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: 2026-10-20 - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:review-plan-m365 onAI live pricing: named Microsoft 365 plan scope. The Per seat card expressly includes Microsoft 365 answers and the Flat price card includes everything in Per seat; the cards do not establish separate DPA, provider-retention or support entitlements. - URL: https://onaihq.com/#pricing - Locator: Per seat > Answers from Microsoft 365, with each user’s own permissions; Flat price > Everything in Per seat, for every employee - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:review-residency-parts onAI live residency statements and external processing paths. The page separately describes European application/storage infrastructure, named dedicated locations, external AI/search/image/translation services and an optional EU-only AI-processing tier; its unqualified secured-EU-server line does not establish default end-to-end processing, backup, log or support-access residency. - URL: https://onaihq.com/#sovereignty - Locator: Ready for your security review; European from the contract down to the DNS; Where your data lives; External services, filtered; EU-only processing on request; pricing cards - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### librechat:librechat:export-pin LibreChat conversation export implementation. The pinned user conversation exporter supports JSON, CSV, Markdown and text, plus screenshot export. - URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LibreChat-AI/LibreChat/e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0/client/src/hooks/Conversations/useExportConversation.ts - Locator: client/src/hooks/Conversations/useExportConversation.ts, export dispatch - Evidence kind: source-inspected - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 - Commit: e8f3be08623663d4ad7f7241e693c94469b63bb0 - Path: client/src/hooks/Conversations/useExportConversation.ts ### onai:public-services onAI public product and pricing page. The vendor offers tailored training, workshops and custom agent services; Flat price lists onboarding, training and workshops without itemised service prices. - URL: https://onaihq.com/ - Locator: AI Trainings; AI Workshops; Custom AI Agent Development; Flat price inclusions - Evidence kind: vendor-claimed - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21 ### onai:review-status-service-scope onAI live public status service scope. The public status page lists Website and notice history; it does not identify a Per seat or Flat price workspace service or a contractual SLA. - URL: https://onai.instatus.com - Locator: Service list and recent notice history, retrieved 2026-10-21 - Evidence kind: documented - Source date: Not stated - Retrieved: 2026-10-21